SEC Comment Letter 0000000000-23-005286 to Pacific Coast Oil Trust (CIK 0001538822)
Pacific Coast Oil Trust (CIK 0001538822)
Date: May 17, 2023 · CIK: 0001538822 · Accession: 0000000000-23-005286
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-35532
Show Raw Text
United States securities and exchange commission logo
May 17, 2023
Douglas Schnell
Partner
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Re:Pacific Coast Oil Trust
Preliminary Proxy Statement filed by Shipyard Capital LP et al.
Filed May 8, 2023
File No. 001-35532
Dear Douglas Schnell:
We have reviewed your filing and have the following comments. In some of our
comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your
disclosure.
Please respond to these comments by providing the requested information or advise us as
soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts
and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.
After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments.
PREC 14A filed May 8, 2023
General
1.Please file a form of your proxy card. See Rule 14a-6(a).
2.On the first page of the proxy statement, please state the approximate date on which the
proxy statement and form of proxy are first sent or given to security holders. See Item
1(b) of Schedule 14A.
3.We note Evergreen Capital Management LLC is identified as "dba Evergreen Gavekal" in
the Schedule 13D filed on April 4, 2023 by Evergreen, Shipyard, Cedar Creek and Walter
C. Keenan. Please clarify throughout the filing.
4.We note that the persons filing the proxy statement include Carson Mitchell and Tim
Eriksen. Please revise to include such persons as participants, or advise. In addition,
please ensure that disclosure responsive to the requirements of Items 4 and 5 of Schedule
14A is provided for all participants in the solicitation.
FirstName LastNameDouglas Schnell
Comapany NameWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
May 17, 2023 Page 2
FirstName LastNameDouglas Schnell
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
May 17, 2023
Page 2
5.Please provide disclosure responsive to Item 23 of Schedule 14A.
6.We note the following disclosure on page 4 (as well as similar disclosure at the bottom of
page 7): "Removal of the Trustee requires the affirmative vote of Unitholders holding a
majority of the Units represented in person or by proxy at the Special Meeting (assuming
a quorum is present). Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect
of votes 'AGAINST' this proposal." Please explain the legal basis for making the
statement in the final sentence. In that regard, we note that Section 8.03 of the Trust
Agreement includes the following provision: "Abstentions and broker non-votes shall not
be deemed to be a vote cast."
Questions and Answers about the Special Meeting and the Proposals, page 2
7.We note the following disclosure at the top of page 4: "If you return a properly signed
Proxy Card but do not indicate how you want to vote, your Proxy Card will be counted
toward meeting the quorum but will not be voted FOR or AGAINST the approval of
either of the proposals." This disclosure appears to contradict disclosure found elsewhere
in the proxy statement that indicates that, in the absence of a voting choice having been
specified, the proxy holder will vote the Units in accordance with the proxy holder's
recommendation. Please revise, or advise.
Background of the Solicitation, page 6
8.Please define "Final Prospectus."
9.In the final sentence on page 6, to avoid confusion, please change the tense of the
phrase "the special meeting request is still being evaluated" (emphasis added), or advise.
Proposal One - Removal of Trustee, page 7
10.We note the following statement: "The Shipyard Group has not nominated or otherwise
proposed a successor trustee." With a view toward disclosure, please explain what
consideration the Shipyard Group has given to nominating or proposing a successor
trustee.
Proposal Two - Amendment to the Trust Agreement, page 8
11.Please explain the basis for the disclosure stating that the Trust will bear the costs of the
Special Meeting if the proposal to amend the Trust Agreement is approved. On its face,
the wording of the amendment appears to be ambiguous as to whether the costs of the
Special Meeting itself (as opposed to the costs of future special meetings) would need to
be covered.
Attending the Special Meeting, page 10
12.We note the following disclosure: "Failure to obtain a valid legal proxy from your broker,
bank or other agent and then to register in advance to attend the Special Meeting will
FirstName LastNameDouglas Schnell
Comapany NameWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
May 17, 2023 Page 3
FirstName LastName
Douglas Schnell
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
May 17, 2023
Page 3
make it impossible to participate in the Special Meeting and will result in the non-
registered Unitholder only being able to attend as a guest" (emphasis added). Please
replace "participate in" with "vote at," or advise.
13.We note the following disclosure on page 11: "If you are a Beneficial Owner, you should
have received a Proxy Card and voting instruction form from your broker, bank or other
agent rather than directly from the Trust. Simply complete and mail the Proxy Card as
instructed by your broker, bank or other agent to ensure that your vote is counted." It is
our understanding that, generally, street name holders receive voting instruction forms,
but not proxy cards, from their banks or brokers. Please advise.
We remind you that the filing persons are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of
their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff.
Please direct any questions to Michael Killoy at (202) 551-7576 or David Plattner at
(202) 551-8094.
Sincerely,
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Mergers & Acquisitions