SEC Company Response from Professional Diversity Network, Inc. (IPDN) (CIK 0001546296) (IPDN) — Jan 22, 2013
Professional Diversity Network, Inc. (IPDN) (CIK 0001546296)
Date: Jan. 22, 2013 · CIK: 0001546296 · Accession: 0001193125-13-019370
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-181594
Referenced dates: January 18, 2013
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
SEC Correspondence
January 22, 2013
Barbara C. Jacobs
Assistant Director
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F. Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re:
Professional Diversity Network, LLC
Amendment No. 9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed January 16, 2013
File No. 333-181594
Dear
Ms. Jacobs:
By letter dated January 18, 2013 (the “SEC Letter”), the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) provided comments on Amendment No. 9 (the “Amendment”) to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) submitted by Professional Diversity Network,
LLC (the “Company”).
In order to facilitate your review, this letter responds to each of the comments set forth in the SEC Letter
on a point-by-point basis. The numbered paragraphs set forth below respond to the Staff’s comments and correspond to the numbered paragraphs in the SEC Letter.
Firm Commitment Underwritten IPO prospectus
General
1.
It is unclear why the disclosure in response to prior comment 1 regarding your commission rates from LinkedIn suggests that the commission rates only apply to sales
of your services during 2013. We note that Exhibit C of the Diversity Recruitment Partnership Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.12 to this prospectus does not limit these commissions to revenues in 2013. Please advise. Further, consider adding an
example of the amount of revenue the company would receive under the commission structure to illustrate the stair-step structure of this commission schedule.
Response
We have revised our disclosure to clarify that the commission rates apply to
“each calendar year.” Furthermore, as suggested by the Staff, we have added an example of the amount of commission revenue we would receive under the commission structure to illustrate the stair-step structure of the commission schedule.
2.
You state that following the expiration of your agreement with Monster Worldwide, you expect to experience significant decreases in revenue “at
least for the first quarter of 2013.” Please
clarify whether the company believes that you may begin earning more revenues, than previously earned through Monster Worldwide, as early as the second quarter of fiscal 2013. If true, explain
further the basis for your conclusion. To the extent that it is unlikely you will experience such revenue growth by this time, please revise your disclosures accordingly as your current disclosures imply otherwise.
Response
We do not intend to imply that
we would begin earning more revenues than previously earned through Monster Worldwide as early as the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Therefore, we have revised our disclosure to state that we expect to experience significant decreases in revenue
“for a period of time.” Furthermore, we have added disclosure to state that “[w]e expect to experience such decrease in revenue until such time as LinkedIn and our sales team are able to generate sufficient sales to replace the
revenue previously generated by our agreement with Monster Worldwide.”
Offering, page 11
3.
Please revise the number of shares outstanding prior to and immediately following this offering to reflect the number of shares to be issued upon conversion of debt
based on the most recent outstanding balance of your debt. In this regard, your current disclosures appear to be based on the outstanding balance of your notes payable at September 30, 2012 and therefore, does not account for additional
interest accrued since such time, which will also be converted into shares of your common stock.
Response
We have revised the number of shares outstanding prior to and immediately following this offering on page 11 to reflect the number of
shares to be issued upon conversion of debt based on the outstanding debt balance at December 31, 2012.
Use of Proceeds, page 32
4.
Your disclosure at the top of page 33 continues to indicate that if the underwriter exercises its option to purchase additional shares, the net proceeds from the
offering will be $8.2 million. Please revise this amount to $9.6 million, consistent with your response to our prior comment 7.
Response
We have revised the cited amount to $9.6 million, consistent with our response to
the Staff’s prior comment 7.
Capitalization, page 34
5.
The amounts in your pro forma column should reflect the completion of the events you describe in the related bullet point. In this regard, upon
completion of your corporate reorganization, the amount of Members Equity in the pro forma column should be zero. Likewise, it would appear that as a result of the conversion of the promissory notes, the amount of Notes payable in the pro forma
column should be zero. Please revise these
amounts accordingly or explain to us why the amounts you are currently reflecting are appropriate. Furthermore, please make the same correction to the notes payable amount in the pro forma column
on page 15.
Response
We have revised the Members Equity and Notes Payable numbers in the pro forma column on page 34 to zero as well as revising the Notes Payable number in the pro forma column on page 15 to zero, as per the
Staff’s request.
****
If you
have any questions, please contact our counsel Brian Lee or Michael Froy at SNR Denton US LLP. Mr. Lee may be reached at (212) 768-6926 and Mr. Froy at (312) 876-8222.
Sincerely,
/s/ James Kirsch
James Kirsch
cc: Brian Lee, Esq.
SNR Denton US LLP