SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (NHP, HLTC, NHPAP, NHPBP) (CIK 0001561032) (NHP) — Oct 22, 2014

National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (NHP, HLTC, NHPAP, NHPBP) (CIK 0001561032)
Date: Oct. 22, 2014 · CIK: 0001561032 · Accession: 0001144204-14-062422

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-184677

Date
October 22, 2014
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (NHP, HLTC, NHPAP, NHPBP) (CIK 0001561032)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporate Finance Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to Form S-11 Filed October 8, 2014 File No. 333-184677

Re: American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.

Dear Ms. Gowetski:

On behalf of our client, American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”), we are submitting this letter in response to the telephonic comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on October 17, 2014, with respect to Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (the “Post-Effective Amendment”) filed by the Company with the Commission on October 8, 2014 (No. 333-184677) (the “Registration Statement”). In connection with this letter, the Company is filing an amendment to the Post-Effective Amendment (“Amendment No. 2”) on the date hereof.

Certain of the Staff’s comments call for explanation of, or supplemental information as to, various matters relating to disclosures provided in the Registration Statement. Responses to these comments have been provided by the Company to us and are set forth in this letter. The Company’s responses are set forth below.

General

1. The Staff requested that, going forward, the Company include in its Post-Effective Amendments filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5 a discussion regarding cumulative FFO compared to cumulative distributions and a brief statement as to how this is dilutive.

At the Staff’s request, the Company has included a more fulsome discussion regarding cumulative FFO compared to cumulative distributions. The Company has also included a reference to the risk factor described in response to the Staff’s comment 2 below, which risk factor describes the dilutive impact of distributions that are not covered by FFO. Please see page S-4 of Amendment No. 2. The Company will also include the added language in future Post-Effective Amendments filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5.

2. The Staff requested that, going forward, the Company add or update, as applicable, in its Post-Effective Amendments filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5, a risk factor that discloses the percentage of distributions, if any, that is not covered by cash flow from operations or full fiscal year or stub FFO.

The Company respectfully submits that the Company included a risk factor that disclosed the percentage of distributions that was not covered by cash flow from operations in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 6, 2014 (the “Quarterly Report”). The Quarterly Report, including the relevant risk factor, was incorporated by reference into the Post-Effective Amendment. The Company will also include the risk factor in future Post-Effective Amendments filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5.

The Company acknowledges that:

· should the Commission or the Staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the filing effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing;

· the action of the Commission or the Staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the Company from its full responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; and

· the Company may not assert Staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this letter responding to the Staff’s comments. Please direct any questions concerning this response to the undersigned at (312) 962-3567.

Very truly yours,
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    Proskauer Rose LLP Eleven Times Square New York, NY 10036-8299

October 22, 2014

Ms. Jennifer Gowetski

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

100 F. Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7010

    Re:
    American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.

    Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to Form S-11

    Filed October 8, 2014

    File No. 333-184677

Dear Ms. Gowetski:

On behalf of our client,
American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”), we are submitting this letter in response
to the telephonic comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Commission”) on October 17, 2014, with respect to Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-11 (the “Post-Effective Amendment”) filed by the Company with the Commission on October
8, 2014 (No. 333-184677) (the “Registration Statement”). In connection with this letter, the Company is filing
an amendment to the Post-Effective Amendment (“Amendment No. 2”) on the date hereof.

Certain of the Staff’s
comments call for explanation of, or supplemental information as to, various matters relating to disclosures provided in the Registration
Statement. Responses to these comments have been provided by the Company to us and are set forth in this letter. The Company’s
responses are set forth below.

General

 1. The Staff requested that, going forward, the Company include in its Post-Effective Amendments
filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5 a discussion regarding cumulative FFO compared to cumulative
distributions and a brief statement as to how this is dilutive.

  At the Staff’s request, the Company has included a more fulsome discussion regarding
                                                        cumulative FFO compared to cumulative distributions. The Company has also included a reference to the risk factor described
                                                        in response to the Staff’s comment 2 below, which risk factor describes the dilutive impact of distributions that are
                                                        not covered by FFO. Please see page S-4 of Amendment No. 2. The Company will also include the added language in future
                                                        Post-Effective Amendments filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5.

 2. The Staff requested that, going forward, the Company add or update, as applicable, in its
Post-Effective Amendments filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5, a risk factor that discloses
the percentage of distributions, if any, that is not covered by cash flow from operations or full fiscal year or stub FFO.

  The Company respectfully submits that the Company included a risk factor that disclosed the
                                                        percentage of distributions that was not covered by cash flow from operations in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with
                                                        the Commission on August 6, 2014 (the “Quarterly Report”). The Quarterly Report, including the relevant
                                                        risk factor, was incorporated by reference into the Post-Effective Amendment. The Company will also include the risk factor
                                                        in future Post-Effective Amendments filed pursuant to the undertaking in Section 20.D. of Industry Guide 5.

The Company
acknowledges that:

 · should the Commission or the Staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the filing
effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing;

 · the action of the Commission or the Staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in declaring
the filing effective, does not relieve the Company from its full responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure
in the filing; and

 · the Company may not assert Staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Thank you for your
prompt attention to this letter responding to the Staff’s comments. Please direct any questions concerning this response
to the undersigned at (312) 962-3567.

Very truly yours,

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

By: /s/ Michael J. Choate

             Michael
J. Choate

cc:	          Peter M. Fass, Esq.

James A. Tanaka, Esq.