SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0001193125-23-295434 from FRACTYL HEALTH, INC. (GUTS)

FRACTYL HEALTH, INC.
Date: Dec. 14, 2023 · CIK: 0001572616 · Accession: 0001193125-23-295434

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: October 3, 2023

Date
December 14, 2023
Author
/s/ Nathan Ajiashvili
Form
CORRESP
Company
FRACTYL HEALTH, INC.

Letter

SEC Response Letter

1271 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10020-1401

Tel: +1.212.906.1200 Fax: +1.212.751.4864

www.lw.com

FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES

Austin

Milan

Beijing

Munich

Boston

New York

Brussels

Orange County

Century City

Paris

Chicago

Riyadh

December 14, 2023

Dubai

San Diego

Düsseldorf

San Francisco

Frankfurt

Seoul

Hamburg

Silicon Valley

Hong Kong

Singapore

Houston

Tel Aviv

London

Tokyo

Los Angeles

Washington, D.C.

Madrid

VIA EDGAR

Division of Corporation Finance

Office of Life Sciences

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549-6010

Attention:

Tyler Howes

Alan Campbell

Michael Fay

Brian Cascio

Re:

Fractyl Health, Inc.

Amendment No. 6 to Draft Registration Statement on Form S-1

Submitted September 21, 2023

CIK 0001572616

To the addressees set forth above:

On behalf of our client, Fractyl Health, Inc. (the “Company”), set forth below is the Company’s response to the comment of the Staff (the “Staff”) of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) in its letter dated October 3, 2023, relating to the Company’s Amendment No. 6 to the draft registration statement on Form S-1 submitted on September 21, 2023.

The Company has publicly filed today the registration statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”), together with this letter, via EDGAR submission. For convenience of reference, the text of the comment in the Staff’s letter has been reproduced in bold and italics herein. The Company has also provided its response immediately after the comment. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Registration Statement.

December 14, 2023

Page

Amendment No. 6 to Draft Registration Statement on Form S-1

Prospectus Summary

Our Development Pipeline, page 2

1. We note your response to prior comment 2 and reissue in part. Please further clarify if both the “CE Mark” approval arrow and “Insulin-Treated T2D” arrow are for separate indications. To the extent both of these arrows are targeting the same indication, revise the Revita section of your pipeline table so that the same indication does not appear twice.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised the pipeline table on pages 3 and 123 of the Registration Statement. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the “CE Mark” approval arrow and the “Insulin-Treated T2D” arrow are for separate indications. As disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Company obtained a CE mark from the EU and UK in 2016 for Revita for the improvement of glycemic control in patients with inadequately controlled T2D despite oral and/or injectable glucose lowering medications and/or long-acting insulin, as the Company has indicated in Footnote 1 of the pipeline table on pages 3 and 123 of the Registration Statement. The “Germany Real World Registry” study is evaluating Revita in an ongoing post-approval study in real-world patients with inadequately controlled T2D on at least one ADA, and the Revitalize-1 “Insulin-Treated T2D” study is evaluating Revita in a pivotal Phase 3 clinical study in patients with inadequately controlled T2D despite being on up to three ADAs and 20 to 100 units of insulin daily, a separate indication to the CE Mark approval.

*********

We hope that the foregoing has been responsive to the Staff’s comment and look forward to resolving any outstanding issues as quickly as possible. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (212) 906-2916 with any questions or further comments you may have regarding this filing or if you wish to discuss the above.

Sincerely,
/s/ Nathan Ajiashvili

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

SEC Response Letter

1271 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10020-1401

Tel: +1.212.906.1200  Fax: +1.212.751.4864

www.lw.com

FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES

Austin

Milan

Beijing

Munich

Boston

New York

Brussels

Orange County

Century City

Paris

Chicago

Riyadh

December 14, 2023

Dubai

San Diego

Düsseldorf

San Francisco

Frankfurt

Seoul

Hamburg

Silicon Valley

Hong Kong

Singapore

Houston

Tel Aviv

London

Tokyo

Los Angeles

Washington, D.C.

Madrid

 VIA EDGAR

Division of Corporation Finance

 Office of Life Sciences

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

 100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549-6010

Attention:

Tyler Howes

Alan Campbell

Michael Fay

Brian Cascio

Re:

 Fractyl Health, Inc.

 Amendment
No. 6 to Draft Registration Statement on Form S-1

 Submitted September 21, 2023

CIK 0001572616

 To the addressees set forth above:

On behalf of our client, Fractyl Health, Inc. (the “Company”), set forth below is the Company’s response to the
comment of the Staff (the “Staff”) of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) in its letter dated October 3, 2023, relating to the
Company’s Amendment No. 6 to the draft registration statement on Form S-1 submitted on September 21, 2023.

The Company has publicly filed today the registration statement on Form S-1 (the
“Registration Statement”), together with this letter, via EDGAR submission. For convenience of reference, the text of the comment in the Staff’s letter has been reproduced in bold and italics herein. The Company has also
provided its response immediately after the comment. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Registration Statement.

 December 14, 2023

 Page
 2

 Amendment No. 6 to Draft Registration Statement on Form
S-1

 Prospectus Summary

Our Development Pipeline, page 2

1.
 We note your response to prior comment 2 and reissue in part. Please further clarify if both the
“CE Mark” approval arrow and “Insulin-Treated T2D” arrow are for separate indications. To the extent both of these arrows are targeting the same indication, revise the Revita section of your pipeline table so that the same
indication does not appear twice.

 Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company
has revised the pipeline table on pages 3 and 123 of the Registration Statement. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the “CE Mark” approval arrow and the “Insulin-Treated T2D” arrow are for separate indications.
As disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Company obtained a CE mark from the EU and UK in 2016 for Revita for the improvement of glycemic control in patients with inadequately controlled T2D despite oral and/or injectable glucose lowering
medications and/or long-acting insulin, as the Company has indicated in Footnote 1 of the pipeline table on pages 3 and 123 of the Registration Statement. The “Germany Real World Registry” study is evaluating Revita in an ongoing
post-approval study in real-world patients with inadequately controlled T2D on at least one ADA, and the Revitalize-1 “Insulin-Treated T2D” study is evaluating Revita in a pivotal Phase 3 clinical
study in patients with inadequately controlled T2D despite being on up to three ADAs and 20 to 100 units of insulin daily, a separate indication to the CE Mark approval.

*********

 We hope that the foregoing has been
responsive to the Staff’s comment and look forward to resolving any outstanding issues as quickly as possible. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (212) 906-2916 with any questions or further comments
you may have regarding this filing or if you wish to discuss the above.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Nathan Ajiashvili

 Nathan Ajiashvili

 of LATHAM & WATKINS
LLP

 Enclosures

 cc: (via e-mail)

 Harith Rajagopalan, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, Fractyl Health, Inc.

Johan Brigham, Latham & Watkins LLP

 Evan Smith,
Latham & Watkins LLP

 Jonathan Sarna, Latham & Watkins LLP

Edwin O’Connor, Goodwin Procter LLP

 Alicia Tschirhart,
Goodwin Procter LLP