SEC Comment Letter for Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) (CIK 0001574235) (PULM) — Aug 23, 2013
Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) (CIK 0001574235)
Date: Aug. 23, 2013 · CIK: 0001574235 · Accession: 0000000000-13-046589
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
August 23, 2013 Via E -Mail Hojabr Alimi Chief Executive Officer Ruthigen, Inc. 2455 Bennett Valley Road, Suite C116 Santa Rosa, CA Re: Ruthigen, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 Filed August 8, 2013 File No. 333 -190476 Dear Mr. Alimi : We have reviewed your registration statement and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the requested information . If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments. 1. Please revise your financial statements and MD&A with updated interim financial information through the period ended June 30, 2013. 2. We acknowledge your response to comment 6 and are uncertain why the fact that all direct or indirect product related costs for RUT58 -60 are included in your historical financial statements is determinative as to why carve -out financial statements from Oculus are not necessary. With a view toward telling us more about the development history of RUT58 -60, please revise your disclosure in Business to provide a chronology of the act ivities related to the development of RUT58 -60. At a minimum, please disclose: Hojabr Alimi Chief Executive Officer Ruthigen, Inc. August 23, 2013 Page 2 When Oculus conceived of RUT58 -60; The nature and timing of discovery activities; The nature and timing of formulation activities; The nature and timing of other pre -clinical a ctivities including in vitro and toxicology studies; The number of predecessor formulations and when each was founded that form the basis for the current formulation of RUT58 -60; When the new, unique hypochlorous acid -based formulations that were disclose d to Oculus’ intellectual property counsel in December 2012 were founded and how they relate to the formulations in the preceding bullet; The costs in terms of dollars and/or manpower associated with the discovery and formulation activities, separating the activities untaken by Oculus from those you undertook. In your response, separately tell us whether Oculus sponsored the initial clinical trials conducted by physicians in Mexico that demonstrated the faster tissue healing associated with hypochlorous acid products as disclosed on page 3. In addition tell us what information the Oculus Board of Directors reviewed when, in November 2012, it directed Oculus management to explore the idea of creating a wholly -owned subsidiary within which to pursue the de velopment of RUT58 -60. 3. We note that you are requesting confidential treatment for portions of Exhibit 10.4. Please be advised that we will review your request for confidential treatment once it is received and will provide any comments under separate cover. We will not be able to process any request for acceleration of the effective date of the pending registration statement until any such confidential treatment request is resolved. We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Act of 193 3 and all applicable Securities Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made. Notwithstanding our comments, in the event you request acceleration of the effective date of the pending regist ration statement please provide a written s tatement from the company acknowledging that: should the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the filing effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; Hojabr Alimi Chief Executive Officer Ruthigen, Inc. August 23, 2013 Page 3 the action of the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its full responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; and the company may not asse rt staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. Please refer to Rules 460 and 461 regarding requests for acceleration . We will consider a written request for acceleration of the effective date of the registration statement as confirmation of the fact that those requesting acceleration are aware of their respective responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as they relate to the proposed public offering of the securities specified in the above registration statement. Please allow adequate time for us to review any amendment prior to the requested effective date of the registr ation statement. You may contact Ibolya Ignat at (202) 551 -3656 or Mark Brunhofer at (202) 551 -3638 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact Amy Reischauer at (202) 551 -3793, Daniel Greenspan at (202) 551 -3623, or me at (202) 551-3715 with any other questions. Sincerely, /s/ Jeffrey P. Riedler Jeffrey P. Riedler Assistant Director cc: Via E -Mail Ivan Blumenthal Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. 666 Third Aven ue New York, NY 10017