SEC Company Response from D.C. Capital Advisors, Ltd (CIK 0001576422) — Mar 17, 2020
D.C. Capital Advisors, Ltd (CIK 0001576422)
Date: March 17, 2020 · CIK: 0001576422 · Accession: 0000921895-20-000789
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-06615
Referenced dates: March 6, 2020
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
O L S H A N
1325 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS ● NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
TELEPHONE: 212.451.2300 ● FACSIMILE: 212.451.2222
EMAIL: EGONZALEZ@OLSHANLAW.COM
DIRECT DIAL: 212.451.2206
March 17, 2020
VIA EDGAR AND ELECTRONIC MAIL
Nicholas P. Panos
Senior Special Counsel
Office of Mergers & Acquisitions
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Mail Stop 3628
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: Superior Industries International, Inc. (the “Company”)
PRRNA 14A preliminary proxy statement filing made on Schedule 14A
Filed on March 5, 2020 by D.C. Capital Advisors, Ltd., et al. (the “Proxy Statement”)
File No. 001-06615
Dear Mr. Panos:
We acknowledge receipt
of the comment letter of the Staff (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, dated March 6, 2020
(the “Staff Letter”), with regard to the above-referenced matter. We have reviewed the Staff Letter with D.C. Capital
Advisors, Ltd. and the other participants in its solicitation (collectively, “D.C. Capital”) and provide the following
responses on D.C. Capital’s behalf. For ease of reference, the comments in the Staff Letter are reproduced in italicized
form below. Terms that are not otherwise defined have the meanings ascribed to them in the Proxy Statement.
Amendment Number One to Preliminary Proxy Statement filed
on Schedule 14A
Letter to Stockholders
1. The participants “believe the election of [their] nominee will be a catalyst to change the
boardroom dynamics that have hampered SUP’s progress.” Given that it remains possible that the election of the nominee
could adversely impact “boardroom dynamics” to the extent any opposition or resistance to the Board’s policies
or plans are enunciated, please qualify the cited representation that has been made to account for this possibility and to state
exactly how a single director may not only improve boardroom dynamics but also inspire such improvement in the specific context
cited. Alternatively, please delete the representation.
D.C. Capital acknowledges
the Staff’s comment and has revised the Proxy Statement accordingly by deleting the representation.
O L S H A N F R O M E W O L O S K Y L L P
WWW.OLSHANLAW.COM
March 17, 2020
Page 2
We Are Concerned that the Board is Not Adequately Aligned
with Common Stockholders, p. 14
2. The participants believe the existing “independent directors lack a meaningful vested financial
interest in the common shares of the Company.” The participants also represent that “the Board needs to be refreshed
with new, independent and objective perspectives, including the addition of a stockholder representative on the Board that is aligned
with the common stockholders.” Please revise to identify the specific misalignment, or remove the implication that the existing
Board has misaligned interests. Given the participants’ nominee owns 32,500 shares, please remove the impression that his
addition to the Board would add a representative who holds a “meaningful vested financial interest in the common shares…”
D.C. Capital acknowledges
the Staff’s comment and has revised the Proxy Statement accordingly.
The Nominee, page
16
3. The disclosure indicates D.C. Capital believes the nominee “would be, an ‘independent
director’ within the meaning of (i) applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards applicable to board composition…”
Notwithstanding the participant’s belief, disclosure elsewhere in the proxy statement and related letter to stockholders
characterizes the nominee as already being “independent.” Under the NYSE’s listing standards, a director is not
deemed to be independent unless the Board first determines, based on subjective criteria, that such director is independent. Accordingly,
the participants should revise to remove the implication that a conclusion already has been reached. In addition, the participants
should disclose that even if they believe that the Board is likely to determine that the nominee is independent under the NYSE
listing standards, ultimately, the determination of such person’s independence rests with the judgment and discretion of
the Board.
D.C. Capital acknowledges
the Staff’s comment and has revised the Proxy Statement accordingly.
Solicitation of Proxies, page 22
4. The current disclosure omits any reference to any of the following additional participants as
being involved in the solicitation of proxies from the Company’s stockholders: D.C. Capital Advisors, D.C.R. Partners, Mr.
Dethy, and Mr. Benvenuti. Further, Item 4(b)(2) of Schedule 14A requires the disclosure of the class or classes of employees of
any participant in the solicitation that will be involved in the solicitation of stockholders. The participants should disclose
which class or classes of employees of the participants have been enlisted to conduct the solicitation, including the employees
of D.C. Capital Partners, D.C. Capital Advisors, and D.C.R. Partners and the manner and nature of their employment for such purpose.
Alternatively, notwithstanding the permissibility of not disclosing negative responses pursuant to Rule 14a-5(a), please confirm
that no such persons will be soliciting any proxies.
D.C. Capital acknowledges
the Staff’s comment and has revised the Proxy Statement accordingly.
* * * * *
The Staff is invited
to contact the undersigned with any comments or questions it may have. We would appreciate your prompt advice as to whether the
Staff has any further comments. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
/s/ Elizabeth Gonzalez-Sussman
Elizabeth Gonzalez-Sussman
cc: Douglas L. Dethy, D.C. Capital Advisors, Ltd.