Correspondence 0001104659-24-116947 from GROUNDFLOOR FINANCE INC. (CIK 0001588504)
GROUNDFLOOR FINANCE INC. (CIK 0001588504)
Date: Nov. 12, 2024 · CIK: 0001588504 · Accession: 0001104659-24-116947
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 024-12013
Referenced dates: October 31, 2024
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Brian
S. Korn
Manatt,
Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Direct
Dial: (212) 790-4510
E-mail:
BKorn@manatt.com
November 12, 2024
Via EDGAR CORRESPONDENCE
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-6010
Attention: Mr. Ruairi Regan and Ms. Brigitte Lippmann
Office of Real Estate and Construction
Re:
Groundfloor
Finance Inc.
Offering
Statement on Form 1-A
Post
Qualification Amendment No. 5
Filed:
July 26, 2024
File No. 024-12013
Dear Mr. Demarest and Ms. Marrone:
We are submitting this letter
on behalf of our client, Groundfloor Finance Inc. (the “Company”), in response to the written comments of the staff
(the “Staff”) of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contained in
your letter dated October 31, 2024 (the “Comment Letter”) in connection with the Company’s Offering Statement
on Form 1-A POS (the “Offering Statement”), as filed with the SEC on October 18, 2024.
For your convenience, our
responses are set forth below, with the headings and numbered items of this letter corresponding to the headings and numbered items contained
in the Comment Letter. Each of the comments from the Comment Letter is restated in bold and italics prior to the Company’s response.
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Offering Statement.
All page number references in the Company’s responses are to page numbers in the Offering Statement, which is being refiled
concurrently with this response.
General
1.
We note your revised disclosure in response to prior comment 8 that in the event a
subscription is rejected, the Company will provide notification within two business days of the end of the offering period. Given,
it appears, you may have a 90 day offering period to process subscription requests and can reject a subscription for any reason and
may terminate the offering, please provide us your analysis as to whether your offering should be considered to be a delayed
offering and not a continuous offering within the meaning of Rule 251(d)(3)(i)(F) of Regulation A.
Response:
The Company acknowledges
the comment. Rule 251(d)(3)(i)(F) states that “continous or delayed offerings may be made under this Regulation A, so
long as the offering statement pertains only to:… (F) securities the offering of which will be commenced within two calendar
days after the qualification date, will be made on a continuous basis, may continue for a period in excess of 30 calendar days from the
date of initial qualification, and will be offered in an amount that, at the time the offering statement is qualified, is reasonably
expected to be offered and sold within two years from the initial qualification date.”
The Company’s offering
is a continuous offering within the meaning of Rule 251(d)(3)(i)(F), as the Company commences the offering of each series of LROs
promptly, within two calendar days, after the qualification of the Offering Statement, the LROs are offered on a continuous basis, and
sales of the LROs may occur on a daily basis via the Groundfloor Platform. The LROs are issued in distinct series, the offerings of which
comprise 100% of the Loan Principal of the corresponding real estate project. If the Company rejects a subscription or terminates an
offering, such rejection or termination is with respect to a particular LRO or series, rather than the offering of LROs qualified under
the Offeirng Statement, which is continuous. The timing and extent to which the offerings become subscribed is typically dependent upon
investor demand for a particular Project and the Project’s remaining need for funding. Such need is generally based on the Project’s
construction or renovation timeline and adherence. Nevertheless, although investor demand and the schedule of a Project impact whether
full subscription occurs within a particular time, all LROs that are qualified are reasonably expected to be offered and sold within
the required two year period. Despite compliance with Rule 251(d)(3)(i)(E), a subscription may be rejected for various reasons,
including if an offering is oversubscribed or has other defects such as being for a greater amount than the investor has successfully
deposited at the time. Disclosure has been modified to reflect that the two business days
refer to that offering of that particular LRO only. See pg. 119.
Brian
S. Korn
Manatt,
Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Direct
Dial: (212) 790-4510
E-mail:
BKorn@manatt.com
2. Please
update your filing to include interim financial statements as of a date no earlier than six months after the most recently completed
fiscal year end. Reference is made to Regulation A, Part F/S(b)(3)(B).
Response:
The Company acknowledges
the comment and has updated the filing to include unaudited interim financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2024.
We thank you for your prompt
attention to this letter responding to the previously submitted Offering Statement and comment letter response. Should the Staff have
additional questions or comments regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (212) 790-4510.
Sincerely,
Brian S. Korn
cc:
Nick
Bhargava
Groundfloor
Finance Inc.