SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from SKYX Platforms Corp. (SKYX) (CIK 0001598981) (SKYX) — Jul 8, 2016

SKYX Platforms Corp. (SKYX) (CIK 0001598981)
Date: July 8, 2016 · CIK: 0001598981 · Accession: 0000721748-16-001428

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 000-55416

Date
July 8, 2016
Author
SAFETY
Form
CORRESP
Company
SKYX Platforms Corp. (SKYX) (CIK 0001598981)

Letter

SAFETY QUICK LIGHTING & FANS CORP.

4400 North Point Parkway, Suite 154

Alpharetta, GA 30022

Tel: (770) 754-4711

Via Edgar

July 8, 2016

Division of Corporation Finance

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention: Emily Drazen, Esq.

Larry Spirgel, Assistant Director

Re: Safety Quick Lighting & Fans Corp.

Preliminary Information Statement Filed on Schedule 14C

Filed July 1, 2016

File No. 000-55416

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of Safety Quick Lighting & Fans Corp. (the “Company”), we are writing to respond to the comments raised in the letter, dated July 6, 2016, from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) regarding the Company’s Preliminary Information Statement on Form 14C filed with the Commission on July 1, 2016 (the “Schedule 14C”). The Company’s responses below correspond to the captions and numbers of those comments, which are reproduced below in italics. In response to your comments, the Company has amended the Schedule 14C, as appropriate, filed an amended copy of the Schedule 14C with the Commission, and sent you a marked copy of the Schedule 14C to highlight the changes. Capitalized terms used in this letter but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Information Statement.

General

Comment 1: We note your disclosure that the majority shareholders provided approval by written consent for these actions. However, according to your beneficial ownership table no party owns more than 50 percent of the outstanding shares. Please specify who provided written consent for these actions and describe the events that led to your receipt of the written consents. Additionally, provide a detailed legal analysis of the basis on which you concluded that the process of obtaining the consents did not involve a solicitation within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 14a-1(l).

Response:

In response to the Commission’s comment, the Company obtained the written consent of three shareholders of the Company whose ownership represents approximately 56.82% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of June 29, 2016. The three consenting shareholders were Dov Shiff (22.93%), KRNB Holdings LLC (17.19%) and Motek 7 SQL LLC (16.69%) (collectively, the “Consenting Shareholders”). The percentage beneficial ownership reported in the Company’s beneficial ownership table for all but Mr. Shiff match the percentages above; the difference is explained by the 4,290,000 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Shiff and issuable to Mr. Shiff upon conversion or exercise of a note and warrant, as the case may be, as further described in footnote 5 to the beneficial ownership table.

The Company does not believe that the communications between the Consenting Shareholders involved a solicitation within the meaning of Rule 14a-1(l)(1) of the Exchange Act. Rather, the Company believes that these communications fall within the purview of communications that do not constitute solicitation under Rule 14a-l (l)(2)(i), which excludes from the definition of a “solicitation” the “furnishing of a form of proxy to a security holder upon the unsolicited request of such security holder”, and/or Rule 14a-l (l)(2)(iv), which excludes “a communication by a security holder who does not otherwise engage in a proxy solicitation (other than a solicitation exempt under section 240.14a–2) stating how the security holder intends to vote and the reasons therefor, provided that the communication… (C) is made in response to unsolicited requests for additional information with respect to a prior communication by the security holder made pursuant to 14a-1(l)(2)(iv)”.

The Consenting Shareholders are founding members of the Company, and two are currently members of the Company’s Board of Directors (Mr. Shiff and Mr. Kohen, Manager of KRNB Holdings LLC). The Consenting Shareholders informally discussed their desire to effectuate the actions outlined in the Schedule 14C. Following informal discussions among founding shareholders and officers of the Company, the Company’s Board of Directors proceeded with resolutions concerning the actions outlined in the Schedule 14C, which was followed by the Consenting Shareholders written consent. The communications between the Consenting Shareholders entailed collaborative discussions between a small group of active shareholders who are all long-term founding members of and significant investors in the Company, for the purpose of exploring steps that would be in the best interests of the Company and all of its shareholders. Furthermore, no commission or remuneration was paid in obtaining the consents from the Consenting Shareholders.

As such, it is the Company’s position that the process of obtaining consents did not involve a solicitation within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 14a-1(l). The Company therefore believes that the use of an Information Statement on Schedule 14C is the appropriate form for communication of the corporate actions to the Company’s shareholders.

Action Four

Comment 2: Please expand your disclosure to discuss the purpose for the proposed name change. Please advise if the name change is in connection to a change in business or control.

Response: In response to the Commission’s comment, the Company has revised the Schedule 14C to discuss the purpose of the proposed name change and to clarify that the name change is not in connection with a change in business or control of the Company. Please see page 20 of the Schedule 14C.

Action Five

Comment 3: Please expand your disclosure to discuss the purpose for the designation of a class of convertible preferred stock. Additionally, discuss any current plans for these shares once designated, any potential dilution upon conversion and the terms of the designation in the body of the disclosure.

Response: In response to the Commission’s comment, the Company has revised the Schedule 14C to expand the Company’s disclosure concerning the purpose of the designation of a class of convertible preferred stock, the intended plans, the potential impact on dilution upon conversion, and the general terms of the designation. Please see page 21 of the Schedule 14C.

Also, the Company has revised the Certificate of Designation attached as Appendix B to the Schedule 14C, removing the automatic conversion provision in Section 5(b) and adding a put option provision in Section 10(c), in order to reflect a change to the rights of the Preferred Stock. The written consents by the Board of Directors and the Consenting Shareholders both approve the Certificate of Designation in substantially the form reviewed, and authorize the officers and directors to take such actions and deliver such documents as reasonably deemed necessary to effectuate the resolutions, which includes revising the terms of the Preferred Stock.

In connection with the above responses, the Company hereby acknowledges the following:

· The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

· Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

· The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions relating to any of the foregoing, please contact the undersigned, or Peter J. Gennuso, Company Counsel, at (212) 908-3958.

Respectfully,
SAFETY
QUICK LIGHTING & FANS CORP.

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

SAFETY QUICK LIGHTING & FANS CORP.

4400 North Point Parkway, Suite 154

Alpharetta, GA 30022

Tel: (770) 754-4711

Via Edgar

July 8, 2016

Division of Corporation Finance

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:  Emily
                                         Drazen, Esq.

    Larry
                                         Spirgel, Assistant Director

Re:  Safety
                                         Quick Lighting & Fans Corp.

    Preliminary
                                         Information Statement Filed on Schedule 14C

    Filed
                                         July 1, 2016

    File
                                         No. 000-55416

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of Safety Quick Lighting & Fans
Corp. (the “Company”), we are writing to respond to the comments raised in the letter, dated July 6, 2016, from the
staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) regarding the Company’s Preliminary Information
Statement on Form 14C filed with the Commission on July 1, 2016 (the “Schedule 14C”). The Company’s responses
below correspond to the captions and numbers of those comments, which are reproduced below in italics. In response to your comments,
the Company has amended the Schedule 14C, as appropriate, filed an amended copy of the Schedule 14C with the Commission, and sent
you a marked copy of the Schedule 14C to highlight the changes. Capitalized terms used in this letter but not otherwise defined
herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Information Statement.

General

 Comment
                                         1: We
                                         note your disclosure that the majority shareholders provided approval by written consent
                                         for these actions. However, according to your beneficial ownership table no party owns
                                         more than 50 percent of the outstanding shares. Please specify who provided written consent
                                         for these actions and describe the events that led to your receipt of the written consents.
                                         Additionally, provide a detailed legal analysis of the basis on which you concluded that
                                         the process of obtaining the consents did not involve a solicitation within the meaning
                                         of Exchange Act Rule 14a-1(l).

                                                 Response:

 In
                                         response to the Commission’s comment, the Company obtained the written consent
                                         of three shareholders of the Company whose ownership represents approximately 56.82%
                                         of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of June 29, 2016. The three consenting
                                         shareholders were Dov Shiff (22.93%), KRNB Holdings LLC (17.19%) and Motek 7 SQL LLC
                                         (16.69%) (collectively, the “Consenting Shareholders”). The percentage beneficial
                                         ownership reported in the Company’s beneficial ownership table for all but Mr.
                                         Shiff match the percentages above; the difference is explained by the 4,290,000 shares
                                         of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Shiff and issuable to Mr. Shiff upon conversion
                                         or exercise of a note and warrant, as the case may be, as further described in footnote
                                         5 to the beneficial ownership table.

1

  The
                                         Company does not believe that the communications between the Consenting Shareholders
                                         involved a solicitation within the meaning of Rule 14a-1(l)(1) of the Exchange Act. Rather,
                                         the Company believes that these communications fall within the purview of communications
                                         that do not constitute solicitation under Rule 14a-l (l)(2)(i), which excludes from the
                                         definition of a “solicitation” the “furnishing of a form of proxy to
                                         a security holder upon the unsolicited request of such security holder”, and/or
                                         Rule 14a-l (l)(2)(iv), which excludes “a communication by a security holder who
                                         does not otherwise engage in a proxy solicitation (other than a solicitation exempt under
                                         section 240.14a–2) stating how the security holder intends to vote and the reasons
                                         therefor, provided that the communication… (C) is made in response to unsolicited
                                         requests for additional information with respect to a prior communication by the security
                                         holder made pursuant to 14a-1(l)(2)(iv)”.

  The
                                         Consenting Shareholders are founding members of the Company, and two are currently members
                                         of the Company’s Board of Directors (Mr. Shiff and Mr. Kohen, Manager of KRNB Holdings
                                         LLC). The Consenting Shareholders informally discussed their desire to effectuate the
                                         actions outlined in the Schedule 14C. Following informal discussions among founding shareholders
                                         and officers of the Company, the Company’s Board of Directors proceeded with resolutions
                                         concerning the actions outlined in the Schedule 14C, which was followed by the Consenting
                                         Shareholders written consent. The communications between the Consenting Shareholders
                                         entailed collaborative discussions between a small group of active shareholders who are
                                         all long-term founding members of and significant investors in the Company, for the purpose
                                         of exploring steps that would be in the best interests of the Company and all of its
                                         shareholders. Furthermore, no commission or remuneration was paid in obtaining the consents
                                         from the Consenting Shareholders.

  As
                                         such, it is the Company’s position that the process of obtaining consents did not
                                         involve a solicitation within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 14a-1(l). The Company
                                         therefore believes that the use of an Information Statement on Schedule 14C is the appropriate
                                         form for communication of the corporate actions to the Company’s shareholders.

Action Four

    Comment 2:     Please
                                         expand your disclosure to discuss the purpose for the proposed name change. Please advise
                                         if the name change is in connection to a change in business or control.

 Response: In
                                         response to the Commission’s comment, the Company has revised the Schedule 14C
                                         to discuss the purpose of the proposed name change and to clarify that the name change
                                         is not in connection with a change in business or control of the Company. Please see
                                         page 20 of the Schedule 14C.

Action Five

 Comment
                          3: Please
                                        expand your disclosure to discuss the purpose for the designation of a class of convertible
                                        preferred stock. Additionally, discuss any current plans for these shares once designated,
                                        any potential dilution upon conversion and the terms of the designation in the body of
                                        the disclosure.

 Response: In
                                         response to the Commission’s comment, the Company has revised the Schedule 14C
                                         to expand the Company’s disclosure concerning the purpose of the designation of
                                         a class of convertible preferred stock, the intended plans, the potential impact on dilution
                                         upon conversion, and the general terms of the designation. Please see page 21 of the
                                         Schedule 14C.

2

  Also,
                                                      the Company has revised the Certificate of Designation attached as Appendix B to the
                                                      Schedule 14C, removing the automatic conversion provision in Section 5(b) and adding a put option provision in Section 10(c),
                                                      in                                                       order to
                                                      reflect                                                                                                             a
                                                      change                                                       to the
                                                      rights of the                                                       Preferred Stock. The written consents by the
                                                      Board of Directors                                          and the Consenting Shareholders both approve the Certificate of
                                                      Designation in substantially                                          the form reviewed, and authorize the officers and
                                                      directors to take such actions and                                          deliver such documents as reasonably deemed
                                                      necessary to effectuate the resolutions,                                          which includes  revising the terms of
                                                      the                                                       Preferred Stock.

In connection with the above responses, the
Company hereby acknowledges the following:

 · The
                                         Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 · Staff
                                         comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the
                                         Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

 · The
                                         Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the
                                         Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Thank you in advance for your attention to
this matter. If you have any questions relating to any of the foregoing, please contact the undersigned, or Peter J. Gennuso,
Company Counsel, at (212) 908-3958.

Respectfully,

SAFETY
QUICK LIGHTING & FANS CORP.

/s/
John P. Campi

Name:	John
P. Campi

Title:	Chief
Executive Officer

cc:  Rani
                                         Kohen, Chairman, Safety Quick Lighting & Fans Corp.

    Peter
                                         J. Gennuso, Esq.

3