SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0001580642-24-005041 from TCW Direct Lending LLC (CIK 0001603480)

TCW Direct Lending LLC (CIK 0001603480)
Date: Aug. 30, 2024 · CIK: 0001603480 · Accession: 0001580642-24-005041

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 814-01069

Date
August 30, 2024
Author
/s/ David A. Hearth
Form
CORRESP
Company
TCW Direct Lending LLC (CIK 0001603480)

Letter

Paul Hastings LLP

101 California Street, Forty-Eighth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

telephone (415) 856-7000

facsimile (415) 856-7100

www.paulhastings.com

August 30, 2024

VIA EDGAR correspondence

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Re: TCW Direct Lending LLC - File No. 814-01069

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of TCW Direct Lending LLC (the “Registrant”), we hereby respond to the oral comment provided on August 27, 2024 to the undersigned by Ms. Valerie J. Lithotomos of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Registrant’s preliminary proxy soliciting materials, which contained disclosure with respect to the planned solicitation of consents from unitholders of the Registrant.

The Registrant’s response to that comment is provided below. We have restated the substance of that comment to the best of our understanding. Capitalized terms have the same meanings as in the proxy statement, unless otherwise indicated. We have consulted with the Registrant in preparing and submitting this response letter.

The Registrant also acknowledges the Staff’s standard disclaimer as expressed as part of the oral comments.

1. Comment: The Consent Solicitation disclosure states that the Board of Directors has authorized the Registrant to issue the Consent Solicitation, but does not disclose the factors considered by the Board with respect to that authorization or any related recommendation. Please supplementally explain why the Registrant did not include a discussion of those factors.

Response: Comment acknowledged. The Board was comfortable authorizing the Consent Solicitation because it views the sophisticated institutional investors that have invested in the Registrant to be capable of conducting an analysis and making their own determinations about the proposal. The Board did not want to substitute its judgment or make findings about this proposal when those investors are better situated to make a determination based on their own interests.

* * * * *

Please contact the undersigned at (415) 856-7007 with comments and questions.

Very truly yours,
/s/ David A. Hearth

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Paul Hastings LLP

101 California Street, Forty-Eighth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

telephone (415) 856-7000

facsimile (415) 856-7100

www.paulhastings.com

    August 30, 2024

VIA EDGAR correspondence

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

 Re: TCW Direct Lending LLC - File No. 814-01069

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of TCW Direct Lending LLC (the “Registrant”), we hereby
respond to the oral comment provided on August 27, 2024 to the undersigned by Ms. Valerie J. Lithotomos of the staff (the “Staff”)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Registrant’s preliminary proxy soliciting materials, which contained
disclosure with respect to the planned solicitation of consents from unitholders of the Registrant.

The Registrant’s response to that comment is provided below. We have
restated the substance of that comment to the best of our understanding. Capitalized terms have the same meanings as in the proxy statement,
unless otherwise indicated. We have consulted with the Registrant in preparing and submitting this response letter.

The Registrant also acknowledges the Staff’s standard disclaimer as
expressed as part of the oral comments.

 1. Comment: The Consent Solicitation disclosure states that the Board of Directors has authorized the Registrant to issue the
Consent Solicitation, but does not disclose the factors considered by the Board with respect to that authorization or any related recommendation.
Please supplementally explain why the Registrant did not include a discussion of those factors.

Response: Comment acknowledged. The Board was comfortable authorizing
the Consent Solicitation because it views the sophisticated institutional investors that have invested in the Registrant to be capable
of conducting an analysis and making their own determinations about the proposal. The Board did not want to substitute its judgment or
make findings about this proposal when those investors are better situated to make a determination based on their own interests.

* * * * *

Please contact the undersigned at (415) 856-7007 with comments and questions.

Very truly yours,

/s/ David A. Hearth

David A. Hearth

for PAUL HASTINGS LLP

cc: TCW Investment Management Company LLC