SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for AQUABOUNTY TECHNOLOGIES INC (AQB) (CIK 0001603978) (AQB) — Aug 6, 2014

AQUABOUNTY TECHNOLOGIES INC (AQB) (CIK 0001603978)
Date: Aug. 6, 2014 · CIK: 0001603978 · Accession: 0000000000-14-039845

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-36426

Referenced dates: May 21, 2014

Date
August 6, 2014
Author
/s/ J. Nolan McWilliams
Form
UPLOAD
Company
AQUABOUNTY TECHNOLOGIES INC (AQB) (CIK 0001603978)

Letter

August 6, 2014 Via E -mail Ronald L. Stotish Chief Executive Officer AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. Two Clock Tower Place, Suite 395 Maynard, MA 01754

Re: AquaBounty Technologies , Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-12B Filed July 23 , 2014 File No. 001-36426

Dear Mr. Stotish :

We have reviewed your responses to the comments in our letter dated May 21, 2014 and have the following additional comments.

General

Item 1. Business, page 3

Overview, page 3

1. Refer to the Center for Veterinary Medicine Guidance for Industry #132, The Administrative New Animal Drug Application Process, available on the FDA website. You state here that you “have completed all sections of the New Animal Drug Application, or NADA, process with . . . the FDA, for AquAdvantage® Salmon, but are still waiting for formal approval of the NADA ,” and you state on page 8 that “[b] y 2010, [you] had completed all of the technical submission requirements fo r approval under the NADA .” It is our understanding that under FDA guidelines, a full NADA is not deemed submitted until all of its technical sections have been completed. Please reconcile this with your disclosure that you submitted a NADA in 1995 and e nsure that you present in your revised disclosure a complete summary of the FDA’s phased review process and the process for submitting and obtaining approval for an Administrative NADA from the FDA .

2. Please disclose and briefly describe each of the technic al sections you have submitted or intend to submit to the FDA and for each technical section disclose whether you have received a technical section complete letter. Please also disclose whether you have received any written conclusions of non -acceptance o f data submitted for any technical section.

Ronald L. Stotish AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. August 6, 2014 Page 2

3. We note your disclosure on page 4 that you entered into a contract research agreement with Tethys Aquaculture Canada, Inc., to provide you with the resources required for your development needs . Please file this agreement as an exhibit, or tell us why you do not believe it is material to your business.

The Aquaculture Industry, page 4

4. We note your response to our prior comment 7 and reissue in part. Please address the risks associated with the piscine reov irus. Additionally, we note your disclosure on page 6 that in 2009 you “ incurred an outbreak ” of ISA. Please provide additional details regarding this outbreak and the subsequent remediation measures that were taken .

Our Markets, page 8

5. Refer to the se cond paragraph of this section. Please discuss the basis for your beliefs with respect to cost of production and your expectation that your eggs will “sell at a premium to standard Atlantic salmon eggs. ” Please ensure that all beliefs in your revised disclosure have a reasonable basis. We note in this regard the stage of development of AquAdvantage® Salmon that you have not received FDA approval for sale of this product, and the lack of historical revenues derived from this product.

Regulatory Approval , page 8

6. Refer to the Chairman’s Report and transcript of the Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee Meeting, each available on the FDA website. You state that i n September 2010, the Committee concluded that “AquAdvantage® Salmon is indistinguishable from other farmed Atlantic salmon, is safe to eat and does not pose a threat to the environment under the conditions in which it would live and be harvested. ” Please place this disclosure in context by briefly describing the role and authority of the Comm ittee in the FDA approval process. Please also balance this by disclosing that the panel did not vote or make a recommendation on whether to approve your product for human consumption, and that panel members stated your product would need additional monit oring to determine whether the growing conditions could cause health abnormalities.

7. Please tell us whether you anticipate any other regulatory hurdles, such as may be required for importation or distribution of eggs, permits that may be required to establ ish fish farms, licenses that may be required to sell fish, and any other potentially relevant regulations .

Environmental Regulation, page 9

8. Refer to the Chairman’s Report of the VMAC. We note that some committee members recommended Environmental Impact Statements for additional salmon growing facilities. Please address the need for and anticipated costs associated with environmental impact

Ronald L. Stotish AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. August 6, 2014 Page 3

statements. To the extent revisions to your risk factors are warranted, please revise accordingly.

9. Please discu ss whether you will be required to comply with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act with respect to production of AquAdvantage in the United States.

Intellectual Property, page 9

10. We note your response to our prior comment 10 and reissue in part. Please provide us with a more detailed analysis supporting your conclusion that the license agreement with Genesis and HSC is not required to be filed. Specifically, please address whether your business is substantially dependent on the licensing of this technology . In this regard, we note your disclosure on page 3 that in 2008 you decided to focus your resources on AquAdvantage salmon and “discontinue [d] spending on [y]our other product lines ,” and on page 10 that d espite the expiration of the patent fo r the licensed technology, “ the degree of know -how in the molecular modification process and the regulatory timescales associated with approval of genetically modified fish would present significant barriers to competition .”

Research and Development, pag e 10

11. We note your response to our prior comment 11 and reissue in part. Please explain what you mean by “other technology,” and provide further details concerning the “two projects under the ECC” which you have commenced.

Consolidated Financial Statemen ts, page F -1

12. Please note that you should update the financial statements included in the filing pursuant to Rule 8 -08 of Regulation S -X if your filing is not effective prior to August 13, 2014.

You may contact Patrick Kuhn at (202) 551 -3308 or Doug Jones at (202) 551 -3309 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact Ryan Adams at (202) 551 -3191 or me at (202) 551 -3217 with any other questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ J. Nolan McWilliams

Show Raw Text
August  6, 2014

Via E -mail
Ronald L. Stotish
Chief Executive Officer
AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.
Two Clock Tower Place, Suite 395
Maynard, MA 01754

Re: AquaBounty Technologies , Inc.
 Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-12B
Filed July 23 , 2014
File No. 001-36426

Dear Mr. Stotish :

We have reviewed your responses to the comments in our letter dated May 21, 2014 and
have the following additional comments.

General

Item 1.  Business, page 3

Overview, page 3

1. Refer to the Center for Veterinary Medicine Guidance for Industry #132, The
Administrative  New Animal Drug Application Process, available on the FDA website.
You state  here that you “have completed all sections of the New Animal Drug
Application, or NADA, process with . . . the FDA, for AquAdvantage® Salmon, but are
still waiting for formal approval of the NADA ,” and you state on page 8 that “[b] y 2010,
[you]  had completed all of the technical submission requirements fo r approval under the
NADA .”  It is our understanding that under FDA guidelines, a full NADA is not deemed
submitted until all of its technical sections have been completed.  Please reconcile this
with your disclosure that you submitted a NADA in 1995  and e nsure that you present in
your revised disclosure a complete summary of the FDA’s phased review process and the
process for submitting and obtaining approval for an Administrative NADA from the
FDA .

2. Please disclose and briefly describe each of the technic al sections you have submitted or
intend to submit to the FDA and for each technical section disclose whether you have
received a technical section complete letter.  Please also disclose whether you have
received any written conclusions of non -acceptance o f data submitted for any technical
section.

Ronald L. Stotish
AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.
August 6, 2014
Page 2

 3. We note your disclosure on page 4 that you entered into a contract research agreement
with Tethys Aquaculture Canada, Inc., to provide you with the resources required for
your development needs .  Please file this agreement as an exhibit, or tell us why you do
not believe it is material to your business.

The Aquaculture Industry, page 4

4. We note your response to our prior comment 7 and reissue in part.  Please address the
risks associated with the piscine reov irus.  Additionally, we note your disclosure on page
6 that in 2009 you “ incurred an outbreak ” of ISA.  Please provide additional details
regarding this outbreak and the subsequent  remediation measures  that were taken .

Our Markets, page 8

5. Refer to the se cond paragraph of this section.  Please discuss the basis for your beliefs
with respect to cost of production and your expectation that your eggs will “sell at a
premium to standard Atlantic salmon eggs. ”  Please ensure that all beliefs in your revised
disclosure have a reasonable basis.  We note in this regard the stage of development of
AquAdvantage® Salmon that you have not received FDA approval for sale of this
product, and the lack of historical revenues derived from this product.

Regulatory Approval , page 8

6. Refer to the Chairman’s Report and transcript of the Veterinary Medicine Advisory
Committee Meeting, each available on the FDA website.  You state that i n September
2010, the Committee concluded that “AquAdvantage® Salmon is indistinguishable from
other farmed Atlantic salmon, is safe to eat and does not pose a threat to the environment
under the conditions in which it would live and be harvested. ”  Please place this
disclosure in context by briefly describing the role and authority of the Comm ittee in the
FDA approval process.  Please also balance this by disclosing that the panel did not vote
or make a recommendation on whether to approve your product for human consumption,
and that panel members stated your product would need additional monit oring to
determine whether the growing conditions could cause health abnormalities.

7. Please tell us whether you anticipate any other regulatory hurdles, such as may be
required for importation  or distribution of eggs, permits that may be required to establ ish
fish farms, licenses that may be required to sell fish, and any other potentially relevant
regulations .

Environmental Regulation, page 9

8. Refer to the Chairman’s Report of the VMAC.  We note that some committee members
recommended Environmental Impact  Statements for additional salmon growing facilities.
Please address the need for and anticipated costs associated with environmental impact

Ronald L. Stotish
AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.
August 6, 2014
Page 3

 statements.  To the extent revisions to your risk factors are warranted, please revise
accordingly.

9. Please discu ss whether you will be required to comply with section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act with respect to production of AquAdvantage in the United States.

Intellectual Property, page 9

10. We note your response to our prior comment 10 and reissue in part.  Please provide us
with a more detailed analysis supporting your conclusion that the license agreement with
Genesis and HSC is  not required to be filed.  Specifically, please address whether your
business is substantially dependent on the licensing  of this technology .  In this regard, we
note your disclosure on page  3 that in 2008 you decided to focus your resources on
AquAdvantage  salmon and “discontinue [d] spending on [y]our other product lines ,” and
on page 10 that d espite the expiration of the patent fo r the licensed  technology, “ the
degree of know -how in the molecular modification process and the regulatory timescales
associated with approval of genetically modified fish would present significant barriers to
competition .”

Research and Development, pag e 10

11. We note your response to our prior comment 11 and reissue in part.  Please explain what
you mean by “other technology,” and provide further details concerning the “two projects
under the ECC” which you have commenced.

Consolidated Financial Statemen ts, page F -1

12. Please note that you should update the financial statements included in the filing pursuant
to Rule 8 -08 of Regulation S -X if your filing is not effective prior to August 13, 2014.

You may contact Patrick Kuhn at (202) 551 -3308 or Doug Jones  at (202) 551 -3309 if you
have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters.  Please
contact Ryan Adams  at (202) 551 -3191  or me at (202) 551 -3217  with any other questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ J. Nolan McWilliams

J. Nolan McWilliams
Attorney -Advisor

cc: Via E-mail
 Bradley C. Brasser , Esq.
Jones Day