SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (WSTRF) (CIK 0001621906) (WSTRF) — Jun 29, 2016

Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (WSTRF) (CIK 0001621906)
Date: June 29, 2016 · CIK: 0001621906 · Accession: 0000000000-16-082576

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 000-55626

Date
June 22, 2016
Author
/s/ Pamela Howell
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (WSTRF) (CIK 0001621906)

Letter

Mail Stop 3561 June 29 , 2016 Via E -mail George Glasier Chief Executive Officer Western Uranium Corporation 700-10 King Street East Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C -1C3

Re: Western Uranium Corporation Amendment No. 1 to Form 10 Filed June 22, 2016 File No. 000-55626

Dear Mr. Glasier :

We have reviewed your amended filing and have the following comments. In some of our comments , we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments within ten busine ss days by providing the requested information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our May 23, 2016 letter .

Our Strategy, page 2

1. We reissue prior comment 4. Please disclose the material terms of your supply agreement. Your revised disclosure should include, but not be limited to, the name of the utility, a range of prices per pound, any committed and non -committed quantities and when deliveries are to begin and end. Also, pleas e provide additional analysis as to why you believe the contract is not one on which the company will be substantially dependent. We note that it is the only contract the company has entered into to date.

2. We partially reissue prior comment 5. Please fil e your exclusive license to use ablation mining technology as an exhibit. See Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S -K.

George Glasier Western Uranium Corp. June 29 , 2016 Page 2

3. We note your response to prior comment 6. Please disclose the material terms of your tolling agreement with the White Mesa Mill.

Propertie s, page 21

4. We note your response to comment 12 and we reissue the comment. Mineral resources must have a reasonable prospect for economic extraction in order to be classified as a mineral resource. A preliminary economic assessment need not be performed to support the reasonable prospect of economic extraction for a mineral resource. For early stage assessments the reasonable prospect for economic extraction is generally demonstrated through the cut -grade with assumed metal prices and costs or by compari ng the attributes of a deposit to those of a similar operation. Please tell us how you determined that your resources for the Sunday Mine Complex and the San Rafael project have a reasonable prospect for economic extraction or revise to remove these resou rces from you filing.

5. We note your response to comment 13 and we partially reissue the comment. For each property that has not been visited by a member of your management team revise to include a statement to this effect.

6. We note your response to comment 18 and we partially reissue the comment. Revise to clarify if the test samples of uranium mineralized materials were collected from your property.

Summary Compensation Table, page 40

7. Please reconcile the disclosure in the table with the disclosu re in the footnote. We note that the footnote indicates the compensation was earned in 2015; however, the table reflects this amount in 2014.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be cert ain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible fo r the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

George Glasier Western Uranium Corp. June 29 , 2016 Page 3

 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact John Coleman, Mining Engineer, at (202) 551 -3610 if you have questions regarding comments on the engineering related matters. Please contact Jonathan Burr at (202) 551 -5833 or Brigitte Lippmann at (202) 551 -3713 with any other questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Pamela Howell
for

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 3561
June 29 , 2016

Via E -mail
George Glasier
Chief Executive Officer
Western Uranium Corporation
700-10 King Street East
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C -1C3

Re: Western Uranium Corporation
 Amendment No. 1 to Form 10
Filed June 22, 2016
File No. 000-55626

Dear Mr. Glasier :

We have reviewed  your amended filing and have the following comments.  In some of
our comments , we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your
disclosure.

Please respond to these comments  within ten busine ss days by providing the requested
information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these  comments, we may have additional comments.
Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our May 23,
2016 letter .

Our Strategy, page 2

1. We reissue prior comment 4.  Please disclose the material terms of your supply
agreement.  Your revised disclosure should include, but not be limited to, the name of the
utility, a range of prices per pound, any committed and non -committed quantities and
when deliveries are to begin and end.  Also, pleas e provide additional analysis as to why
you believe the contract is not one on which the company will be substantially dependent.
We note that it is the only contract the company has entered into to date.

2. We partially reissue  prior comment 5.  Please fil e your exclusive license to use ablation
mining technology as an exhibit.  See Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S -K.

George Glasier
Western Uranium Corp.
June 29 , 2016
Page 2

 3. We note your response to prior comment 6.  Please disclose the material terms of your
tolling agreement with the White Mesa Mill.

Propertie s, page 21

4. We note your response to comment 12 and we reissue the comment.  Mineral resources
must have a reasonable prospect for economic extraction in order to be classified as a
mineral resource. A preliminary economic assessment need not be performed to support
the reasonable prospect of economic extraction for a mineral resource.  For early stage
assessments the reasonable prospect for economic extraction is generally demonstrated
through the cut -grade with assumed metal prices and costs or by compari ng the attributes
of a deposit to those of a similar operation.  Please tell us how you determined that your
resources for the Sunday Mine Complex and the San Rafael project have a reasonable
prospect for economic extraction or revise to remove these resou rces from you filing.

5. We note your response to comment 13 and we partially reissue the comment.  For each
property that has not been visited by a member of your management team revise to
include a statement to this effect.

6. We note your response to comment 18 and we partially reissue the comment.  Revise to
clarify if the test samples of uranium mineralized materials were collected from your
property.

Summary Compensation Table, page 40

7. Please reconcile the disclosure in the table with the disclosu re in the footnote.  We note
that the footnote indicates the compensation was earned in 2015; however, the table
reflects this amount in 2014.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure
in the filing to be cert ain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are
in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible fo r the accuracy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

 In responding to our comments, please provide  a written statement from the company
acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose
the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

George Glasier
Western Uranium Corp.
June 29 , 2016
Page 3

  the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact John Coleman, Mining Engineer, at (202) 551 -3610 if you have
questions regarding comments on the engineering related matters.  Please contact Jonathan Burr
at (202) 551 -5833  or Brigitte Lippmann  at (202) 551 -3713  with any other questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Pamela Howell
 for

 John Reynolds
Assistant Director
Office of Beverages, Apparel, and
Mining

cc: Brad Wiggins
 SecuritiesLawUSA, PC