SecProbe.io

June 26, 2015

Mark Elliott
Chief Executive Officer
Boxlight  Corporation
1045 Progress Circle
Lawrenceville, Georgia 30043

Re: Boxlight Corporation (formerly known as Logical Choice Corporation )
Registration Statement on Form S -1
Filed  June 9,  2015
  File No. 333 -204811

Dear Mr. Elliott :

We have reviewed your registration statement  and have the following comments.  In
some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better
understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the
requested information .  If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and
circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in yo ur
response.

After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you
provide in response to these  comments, we may have  additional comments.

Our history a nd proposed acquisitions, page 6
1. We note your response to prior comment 1. Please revise your disclosure to clarify that,
except as otherwise indicated, the subsidiaries identified in the chart are wholly -owned.
In addition, please add footnote disclosure to include the information in the second and
third sentences of  your response.
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, page 64
2. Please revise this section, where appropriate, to include the supplemental information
contained in your response to prior comment 14.

Mr. Mark Elliott
Boxlight  Corporation
June 26, 2015
Page 2

 Articles of Incorporation Provisions Regar ding Attorney’s Fees, page 68
3. We note your response to prior comment 6.  Your response appears to suggest that a
stockholder would not be prohibited from bringing suit to determine the fee rates to
which his counsel would be entitled “because such an actio n would not constitute an
action alleging wrongdoing for which the company would be liable .”  However, the
revised disclosure does not indicate whether in the absence of a fee agreement between
the company and the stockholder, the stockholder would be required to bring a suit to
determine fees, the consequences of the stockholder failing to bring a suit to determine
fees and/or whether  the company itself might also bring suit to determine fees. Please
revise to provide further clarity regarding the rights and obligations of the company and
the stockholder if an agreement regarding “reasonable fees” cannot be reached between
the stockholder and you prior to commencement of a litigation proceeding.

4. We note the statutory provision provided in response to prio r comment 7.  However, we
re-issue the comment and request that you provide expanded legal analysis.  Specifically,
please tell us whether the legality of the “reasonable fees” provision (or similar
provisions) under  Nevada law has been previously consider ed by state or federal courts
and the outcome, if any, of such proceedings.   Your legal analysis should provide a
detailed discussion of all relevant case law and statutory law.
We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure
in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Act of 193 3 and
all applicable Securities  Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are in
possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

Notwithstanding our comments, in the event  you request acceleration of the effective date
of the pending regist ration statement, please provide  a written statement from the company
acknowledging that:

 should the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the
filing e ffective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect
to the filing;

 the action of the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in
declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its full responsibility for
the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the feder al
securities laws of the United States.

Mr. Mark Elliott
Boxlight  Corporation
June 26, 2015
Page 3

 Please refer to Rules 460 and 461 regarding requests for  acceleration .  We will consider a
written request for acceleration of the effective date of the registration statement as confirmation
of the fact that those requesting acceleration are aware of their respective responsibilities under
the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as they relate to the proposed
public offering of the securities specified in the above registration statement.  Please allow
adequate time  for us to review any amendment prior to the requested effective date of the
registration statement.

You may contact Tara Harkins  at 202 -551-3639 or Kevin Vaughn at 202-551-3643  if you
have questions regarding comments on the fi nancial statements and related matters.  Please
contact Daniel Morris  at 202-551-3314  or me at 202-551-3412  with any other questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Daniel Morris for

 Amanda Ravitz
Assistant Director