SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

July 6,
2015

Amanda
Ravitz, Assistant Director

Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

 Re: Boxlight
                                         Corporation (formerly known as Logical Choice Corporation)

                                         Registration Statement on Form
                                         S-1

                                         Filed June 9, 2015

File
No. 333-204811

Dear Ms.
Ravitz:

This
letter responds to the letter of the staff of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”),
dated June 26, 2015 (the “Comment Letter”), to Mark Elliott, Chief Executive Officer of Boxlight Corporation (f/k/a
Logical Choice Corporation)(the “Company”) regarding the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed by the Company
on June 9, 2015.

This
letter sets forth each comment of the Staff from the Comment Letter (numbered in accordance with the Comment Letter). Immediately
following each comment is the Company’s response to that comment, including, where applicable, a cross-reference to the
location of the changes made. The Company is concurrently submitting via EDGAR this letter and Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1.

Our history
and proposed acquisitions, page 6

1. We
                                         note your response to prior comment 1. Please revise your disclosure to clarify that,
                                         except as otherwise indicated, the subsidiaries identified in the chart are wholly-owned.
                                         In addition, please add footnote disclosure to include the information in the second
                                         and third sentences of your response.

RESPONSE:
We have revised disclosure as suggested and have disclosed in the footnote the entity which owns more than 10% of the shares
of ETL.

Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions, page 64

2. Please
                                         revise this section, where appropriate, to include the supplemental information contained
                                         in your response to prior comment 14.

RESPONSE:
We have revised this section to add that Mr. Alex Kuo is the father of Ms. Tiffany Kuo, one of our directors.

Articles
of Incorporation Provisions Regarding Attorney’s Fees, page 68

3. We
                                         note your response to prior comment 6. Your response appears to suggest that a stockholder
                                         would not be prohibited from bringing suit to determine the fee rates to which his counsel
                                         would be entitled “because such an action would not constitute an action alleging
                                         wrongdoing for which the company would be liable.” However, the revised disclosure
                                         does not indicate whether in the absence of a fee agreement between the company and the
                                         stockholder, the stockholder would be required to bring a suit to determine fees, the
                                         consequences of the stockholder failing to bring a suit to determine fees and/or whether
                                         the company itself might also bring suit to determine fees. Please revise to provide
                                         further clarity regarding the rights and obligations of the company and the stockholder
                                         if an agreement regarding “reasonable fees” cannot be reached between the
                                         stockholder and you prior to commencement of a litigation proceeding.

RESPONSE:
We will be amending the Articles of Incorporation to remove the provisions regarding attorneys’ fees.

4. We
                                         note the statutory provision provided in response to prior comment 7. However, we re-issue
                                         the comment and request that you provide expanded legal analysis Specifically, please
                                         tell us whether the legality of the “reasonable fees” provision (or similar
                                         provisions) under Nevada law has been previously considered by state or federal
                                         courts and the outcome, if any, of such proceedings. Your legal analysis should provide
                                         a detailed discussion of all relevant case law and statutory law.

RESPONSE:
We will be amending the Articles of Incorporation to remove the provisions regarding attorneys’ fees.

The
Company acknowledges that:

 ● should
                                         the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the filing
                                         effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to
                                         the filing;

 ● the
                                         action of the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in declaring
                                         the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its full responsibility for the
                                         adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; and

 ● the
                                         company may not assert staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a defense
                                         in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
                                         laws of the United States.

Sincerely,

BOXLIGHT
CORPORATION

By: /s/
                                         Mark Elliott

Name: Mark
                                         Elliott

Title: Chief
                                         Executive Officer