SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

		Document

October 16, 2019

CORRESPONDENCE VIA EDGAR

Ms. Jeanne Baker

Assistant Chief Accountant

Office of Manufacturing and Construction

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F. Street, N.E.

Washington D.C. 20549-7010

Re:    Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

Comment Letter dated October 2, 2019

Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018

Filed April 2, 2019

Response Dated October 16, 2019

File No. 001-36876

Dear Ms. Baker:

This letter is Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.'s ("we," "us," "B&W" or the "Company") response to the Staff's October 2, 2019 comment letter based on the Staff's review of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the "Form 10-K").  For your convenience, each of the Staff's comments has been reprinted below in bold, followed by our responses.

Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018

Note 3 -- Earnings per Share, page 80

1.

 Your response to comment 1 in our letter dated September 9, 2019 indicates that

"...retrospective accounting for the bonus element in the periods prior to the Rights Offering would not be meaningful to users of the financial statements as all historical periods had losses per share and the impact of the bonus element would be anti-dilutive”. Please provide us with your sufficiently detailed SAB 99 materiality analysis that supports your determination that the misstatements related to your basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share were not quantitatively or qualitatively material to any prior periods, including the 2018 interim periods included in your 2019 Form 10-Q's.   Ensure your analysis considers whether the 2019 Rights Offering further impacts your assessment of materiality.  Additionally, as presented in Appendix A, please provide us your calculation for the 128,617 adjusted shares used in the computation of earnings per share for 2018.

Response

The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment.  As we stated in our response dated September 23, 2019 (emphasis added), “The Company concluded based on the quantitative and qualitative factors that retrospective accounting for the bonus element in the periods prior to the Rights Offering would not be meaningful to users of the financial statements as all historical periods had losses per share and the impact of the bonus element would be anti-dilutive.” Attachment A includes our SAB 99 materiality analysis that supports our determination that the misstatements related to our basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share were not material to any prior periods.

Although the impact on EPS in 2017 and 2016 was almost 10%, the fact that the impact was anti-dilutive, the fact that the timing of the rights offering precluded any investor from knowing the impact before the decision to invest was made, the fact that there was no impact on trends or covenants, the fact that the Company had missed guidance with or without the change in the EPS denominator, and the fact that there was no impact to internal bonus or

1

compensation amounts, and the absence of any impact to the other qualitative factors contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 1.M caused management to conclude that the error was not material after considering all quantitative and qualitative elements. Also, “The quantitative magnitude of losses per share in the prior periods, before and after consideration of the bonus element, are very large compared to the current period share prices throughout the period.”

Appendix B shows the impact of the 2018 Rights Offering bonus element applied retrospectively to the earnings per share amounts for the annual periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 on Form 10-K and for each of the interim periods of 2018 on Form 10-Q and for the 2018 interim periods included in our first and second quarters of 2019 on Form 10-Q.  Appendix B also reflects the impact of the 2019 Rights Offering for the periods ended March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019 as those Form 10-Qs reflect the bonus element from the 2019 Rights Offering in accordance with ASC 260-10-55-13 and 55-14. For comparability, we have excluded the one-for ten reverse stock split on the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock which became effective on July 24, 2019 for amounts disclosed prior to the second quarter 2019 Form 10-Q.  Also, Appendix B shows the impact on the quarter and year-to-date weighted average shares used in the earnings per share calculations caused by the bonus elements being applied retrospectively for the periods presented.

Lastly, to arrive at the 128,617 adjusted shares used in the computation of earnings per share for 2018, each calendar day’s daily total of outstanding shares from January 1, 2018 through May 1, 2018, the date of the 2018 Rights Offering, was multiplied by the bonus element adjustment factor of 1.0995 (rounded) to arrive at an adjusted daily total of shares outstanding.  These adjusted amounts were added to the daily total of outstanding shares from May 2 through December 31, 2018, which already included the additional shares from the 2018 Rights Offering, to arrive at an adjusted annual daily total that was then divided by 365 days to arrive at the 128,617 adjusted shares used in the computation per share for 2018.

We appreciate your feedback on our financial reporting. Should you have any questions about our responses, please contact me at lsalamone@babcock.com.

Sincerely,

/s/ Louis Salamone

Louis Salamone

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

cc:

 Jenn Do, Staff Accountant, SEC Division of Corporation Finance

Robert McKinney, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

2

Appendix A

Form 10-K 2018 Adjusted

Analysis of B&W’s 2018 10-K EPS adjustments on its consolidated financial statements resulting from the 2018 Rights Offering Bonus Element. Note that all per share values are stated as amounts prior to the reverse stock split unless otherwise noted.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

The 2018 Rights Offering (the “Rights Offering”) expired April 30, 2018 with an exercise price of $2.00 per common share which was lower than the fair value of $2.28 per common share, which created a bonus element similar in nature to a stock dividend. In accordance with ASC 260-10-55-14, “The number of common shares used in computing basic and diluted EPS for all periods prior to the rights issue shall be the number of common shares outstanding immediately prior to the issue multiplied by the following factor: (fair value per share immediately prior to the exercise of the rights)/(theoretical ex-rights fair value per share). Theoretical ex-rights fair value per share shall be computed by adding the aggregate fair value of the shares immediately prior to the exercise of the rights to the proceeds expected from the exercise of the rights and dividing by the number of shares outstanding after the exercise of the rights. Example 5 (see paragraph 260-10-55-60) illustrates that provision. If the rights themselves are to be publicly traded separately from the shares prior to the exercise date, fair value for the purposes of this computation shall be established at the close of the last day on which the shares are traded together with the rights.” Expressed visually, the theoretical ex-rights fair value per share and the adjustment factor resulting from the bonus element in the Rights Offering would be as follows:

(a) The equation for computing the theoretical ex-rights fair value per share is:

Aggregate fair value of shares prior to exercise of rights + Proceeds from exercise of rights

Total share outstanding after exercise of rights

(b) The equation for computing the adjustment factor is:

Fair value per share immediately prior to exercise of rights

Theoretical ex-rights fair value per share

The December 31, 2018 10-K EPS disclosures on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and footnote 3 related to EPS did not include the adjustments required by ASC 260-10-55-13 and 55-14. The bonus element which would have adjusted the number of shares used in determining EPS was not recognized due to the immateriality on EPS based on the qualitative and quantitative evaluation discussed below.

The actual Company calculations for the theoretical ex-rights fair value per share and the subsequent adjustment factor are as follows:

 FV of Shares

 Proceeds from exercise

 Ex-rights fair

value per share

(a)

 101,188,917

 +

 248,512,560

Total Shares Outstanding

 168,637,384

 =

 $2.07

Share value on 4/30/2018

 $2.28

 Adjustment factor

Ex-rights fair value per share

 $2.07

 =

 1.0995

3

The impact on the 2018 Form 10-K of the bonus element in the Rights Offering applied retrospectively to 2017 and 2016 is presented below. The impact of the bonus element also applies to the shares in the beginning of 2018 prior to the Rights Offering and therefore the change to weighted average shares and net loss per share is also presented.

2018 (10-K)

 Statement of Operations / Note 3 - Earnings Per Share

 AS REPORTED

 AS REVISED

 2018

 2017

 2016

 2018

 2017

 2016

 Basic and diluted loss per share - continuing operations

 $

 (5.18

 )

 $

 (8.14

 )

 $

 (2.45

 )

 $

 (5.12

 )

 $

 (7.40

 )

 $

 (2.23

 )

 Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share - discontinued operations

 (0.52

 )

 0.05

 0.14

 (0.52

 )

 0.04

 0.13

 Basic and diluted loss per share

 $

 (5.70

 )

 $

 (8.09

 )

 $

 (2.31

 )

 $

 (5.64

 )

 $

 (7.36

 )

 $

 (2.10

 )

 Shares used in the computation of earnings per share

 Basic and diluted

 127,158

 46,935

 50,129

 128,617

 51,605

 55,116

We did not record the retrospective adjustment to EPS as a result of the portion of the Rights Offering that reflected a stock dividend as required by ASC 260. In order to evaluate the significance of the error, management evaluated both quantitative and qualitative considerations.

Qualitative Analysis

Our qualitative analysis is as follows:

Qualitative criterion

 Response

whether the misstatement arises from an item capable of precise measurement or whether it arises from an estimate and, if so, the degree of imprecision inherent in the estimate

 The adjustment item is capable of precise measurement. There is no estimation associated with the misstatement.

whether the misstatement masks a change in earnings or other trends

 The misstatement does not mask a change in earnings or other trends. We recognized material losses in the prior periods. The adjustment does not change any period from earnings to a loss or a loss to earnings. Further, by the nature of the calculation, if the bonus element were to be recorded, then the impact is to reduce the loss per share for a stock price that was in regular decline.

Further, all historical periods had losses per share and the impact of the bonus element would be anti-dilutive. In addition, the quantitative magnitude of losses per share in historical periods, before and after consideration of the bonus element, are very large compared to the current period share prices throughout the period. For example, the Rights Offering was recorded in the 2018 second quarter Form 10-Q.  Our common shares were trading at $1.87 at the time of issuance of the 2018 second quarter Form 10-Q (August 9, 2018). A retrospective reduction to the 2017 EPS from $(8.09) per share to $(7.36) per share would not meaningfully impact a holder of common shares trading at $1.87.

In addition, earnings (losses) per common share do not impact our debt covenants, have not been a recent metric used by analysts due to our history of losses and do not affect entity-specific trends or performance metrics that may influence investment decisions.

Further, adjusted EBITDA, gross margin, operating losses and net losses were unaffected by the misstatement and there is no impact to the balance sheet.

As such, the impact of the misstatement only impacts the denominator of the loss per share calculation as there are no changes to the net loss/earnings.

4

Qualitative criterion

 Response

whether the misstatement hides a failure to meet analysts’ consensus expectations for the enterprise

 The misstatement does not hide a failure to meet analysts’ consensus expectations as the Company stopped providing guidance in August 2018.  Further, EPS guidance was not provided for 2018 or 2019.  As such, the error does not hide a failure to meeting expectations. If the error would have been recorded, the adjustment would be anti-dilutive which would decrease the loss per share in 2017 and 2016.

whether the misstatement changes a loss into income or vice versa

 Losses were recorded in the affected period with or without correction of the misstatement. The impact of the errors would be to retrospectively decrease the loss in prior period EPS only. The error does not change a loss into income or vice versa.

whether the misstatement concerns a segment or other portion of the registrant’s business that has been identified as playing a significant role in the registrant’s operations or profitability

 The misstatement would not have affected any particular segment or other portion of the business.

whether the misstatement affects the registrant’s compliance with regulatory requirements

 The existence of the errors has no impact on compliance with regulatory requirements.

whether the misstatement affects the registrant’s compliance with loan covenants or other contractual requirements

 The misstatement does not affect compliance with loan covenants or other contractual requirements in the current period or in the prior periods. The financial covenants of the credit facility are not tied to EPS.

whether the misstatement has the effect of increasing management’s compensation - for example, by satisfying requirements for the award of bonuses or other forms of incentive compensation

 The misstatement does not have any effect on management compensation.

whether the misstatement involves concealment of an unlawful transaction

 The misstatements do not involve concealment of an unlawful transaction.

whether the misstatement affects entity-specific trends and performance metrics (e.g., non-GAAP measurements) that may influence investment decisions

 The misstatement does not affect entity-specific trends and performance metrics that may influence investment decisions, particularly given the impact of the actual losses already recorded.

whether the misstatement affects metrics that do not drive investor conclusions or are not important to investor models

 The misstatement relates to changes to EPS calculations resulting from a bonus element from the Rights Offering that increases the number of basic and diluted shares used determining the EPS per share for all periods presented.  The total EPS per share amounts were all negative before the misstatement and the negative amounts improved approximately 9.95%, the amount of calculated adjustment factor, due to the dilutive share factor increase.

By the time the information would have been reported in a public filing, the Rights Offering was already concluded (April 30, 2018) and the stock price was already trading above the $2.00 exercise price of the Rights Offering. In addition, as documented above, the impact of the error would have been to decrease the loss per share retrospectively for the prior period amounts. Given the material losses reported, the trend line of our stock price continued to decrease, the timing of the closing of the Rights Offering and reporting of the second quarter Form 10-Q whereby the Company’s stock was already below $2.00 per share, and the press release timing on April 10, 2018 indicating at least $51 million more of contract charges on the Volund loss project