SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

SEC Comment Letter 0000000000-22-013732 to Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRNX) (CIK 0001658247) (CRNX)

Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRNX) (CIK 0001658247)
Date: Dec. 20, 2022 · CIK: 0001658247 · Accession: 0000000000-22-013732

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 001-38583

Date
December 20, 2022
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRNX) (CIK 0001658247)

Letter

United States securities and exchange commission logo December 20, 2022 Marc J.S. Wilson Chief Financial Officer Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 10222 Barnes Canyon Road Bldg. #2 San Diego, California 92121 Re:Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021 Filed March 30, 2022 File No. 001-38583 Dear Marc J.S. Wilson: We have limited our review of your filing to the financial statements and related disclosures and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing the requested information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Stock-based compensation expense , page 72 1.You state that you establish the volatility rate used to determine the fair value of your equity awards based on the historical volatility of a group of similar companies in the biotechnology industry that are publicly traded. As the company has been a public company since 2018, please tell us why you believe this methodology is appropriate. In this regard, tell us what your estimated expected volatility would have been for each year presented if you only considered the company’s expected and historical volatility rates and not the volatility rates of your peers. Further, explain why you did not use these company only rates in estimating the fair value of your stock options for those respective periods, and tell us when you no longer intend to consider the volatility rates of publicly

FirstName LastNameMarc J.S. Wilson Comapany NameCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. December 20, 2022 Page 2 FirstName LastNameMarc J.S. Wilson Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. December 20, 2022 Page 2 traded peers in this estimate. We refer you to ASC718-10-55-37, and question 6 in SAB Topic 14.D.1. Lastly, please explain why the volatility used to estimate your stock option awards in 2021, 86%, is different from the volatility used for your ESPP volatility estimate, 91%. Direct us to disclosure included in your quarterly report for the period ended September 30, 2022 where the assumptions used to determine the fair value of your ESPP awards is discussed. Equity Method Investment , page 72 2.Please provide us with a detailed analysis supporting your conclusion that Radionetics does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and therefore meets the definition of a variable interest entity (VIE). Address the following in your response:

•Explain how you determined that Radionetics would not be able to obtain other non- subordinated sources of financing, if necessary. •Address your considerations of both quantitative and qualitative factors, to the extent considered in determining the sufficiency of equity at risk, using the guidance in ASC 810-10-25-45 through 810-10-25-47. •Ensure that your analysis focuses on whether Radionetics was structured, by design, not to have sufficient equity at risk. In this regard, ASC 810-10-15-14 states that the phrase "by design" refers to legal entities that meet the conditions in this paragraph because of the way they are structured. •ASC 810-10-25-47 states that the design of the legal entity and the apparent intentions of the parties that created the legal entity are important qualitative considerations. Clarify for us whether the formation of Radionetics was essentially the spin-off of your nonpeptide platform into a separate entity funded with $30 million in private financing provided by 5AM Ventures and Frazier Healthcare Partners and how this factored into your analysis. Results of Operations Research and development expenses, page 75 3.We note the significant increase in your research and development expenses in fiscal 2021 and that you have multiple programs/products in varying stages of development and clinical testing, and note that you expect your research and development expenses to increase. Please confirm that you will revise future filings to provide more details about your research and development expenses for each period presented, including but not limited to by product/program, internal versus external, as well as by the nature of the expenses. For example, in discussing the specific reasons for significant changes in research and development expenses, quantify the change by each product candidate for which significant investments were made during the periods. Refer to Item 303(b) of Regulation S-K. To the extent that you do not track expenses by product candidate, please disclose as such.

FirstName LastNameMarc J.S. Wilson Comapany NameCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. December 20, 2022 Page 3 FirstName LastName Marc J.S. Wilson Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. December 20, 2022 Page 3 Exhibits 4.Please explain to us your consideration of Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K in determining whether to file as an exhibit the Collaboration and License Agreement with Radionetics. In closing, we remind you that the company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff. You may contact Ibolya Ignat at 202-551-3636 or Angela Connell at 202-551-3426 with any questions. Sincerely, Division of Corporation Finance Office of Life Sciences

Show Raw Text
United States securities and exchange commission logo
December 20, 2022
Marc J.S. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
10222 Barnes Canyon Road
Bldg. #2
San Diego, California 92121
Re:Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021
Filed March 30, 2022
File No. 001-38583
Dear Marc J.S. Wilson:
            We have limited our review of your filing to the financial statements and related
disclosures and have the following comments.  In some of our comments, we may ask you to
provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.
            Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing the requested
information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.
            After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments.
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Stock-based compensation expense , page 72
1.You state that you establish the volatility rate used to determine the fair value of your
equity awards based on the historical volatility of a group of similar companies in the
biotechnology industry that are publicly traded.  As the company has been a public
company since 2018, please tell us why you believe this methodology is appropriate. In
this regard, tell us what your estimated expected volatility would have been for each year
presented if you only considered the company’s expected and historical volatility rates
and not the volatility rates of your peers. Further, explain why you did not use these
company only rates in estimating the fair value of your stock options for those respective
periods, and tell us when you no longer intend to consider the volatility rates of publicly

 FirstName LastNameMarc J.S.  Wilson
 Comapany NameCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 December 20, 2022 Page 2
 FirstName LastNameMarc J.S.  Wilson
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
December 20, 2022
Page 2
traded peers in this estimate. We refer you to ASC718-10-55-37, and question 6 in SAB
Topic 14.D.1. Lastly, please explain why the volatility used to estimate your stock option
awards in 2021, 86%, is different from the volatility used for your ESPP volatility
estimate, 91%.  Direct us to disclosure included in your quarterly report for the period
ended September 30, 2022 where the assumptions used to determine the fair value of your
ESPP awards is discussed.
Equity Method Investment , page 72
2.Please provide us with a detailed analysis supporting your conclusion that Radionetics
does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support and therefore meets the definition of a variable interest
entity (VIE). Address the following in your response:

•Explain how you determined that Radionetics would not be able to obtain other non-
subordinated sources of financing, if necessary.
•Address your considerations of both quantitative and qualitative factors, to the extent
considered in determining the sufficiency of equity at risk, using the guidance in ASC
810-10-25-45 through 810-10-25-47.
•Ensure that your analysis focuses on whether Radionetics was structured, by design,
not to have sufficient equity at risk. In this regard, ASC 810-10-15-14 states that the
phrase "by design" refers to legal entities that meet the conditions in this paragraph
because of the way they are structured.
•ASC 810-10-25-47 states that the design of the legal entity and the apparent
intentions of the parties that created the legal entity are important qualitative
considerations. Clarify for us whether the formation of Radionetics was essentially
the spin-off of your nonpeptide platform into a separate entity funded with $30
million in private financing provided by 5AM Ventures and Frazier Healthcare
Partners and how this factored into your analysis.
Results of Operations
Research and development expenses, page 75
3.We note the significant increase in your research and development expenses in fiscal 2021
and that you have multiple programs/products in varying stages of development and
clinical testing, and note that you expect your research and development expenses to
increase.  Please confirm that you will revise future filings to provide more details about
your research and development expenses for each period presented, including but not
limited to by product/program, internal versus external, as well as by the nature of the
expenses. For example, in discussing the specific reasons for significant changes
in research and development expenses, quantify the change by each product candidate for
which significant investments were made during the periods.  Refer to Item 303(b) of
Regulation S-K. To the extent that you do not track expenses by product candidate, please
disclose as such.

 FirstName LastNameMarc J.S.  Wilson
 Comapany NameCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 December 20, 2022 Page 3
 FirstName LastName
Marc J.S.  Wilson
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
December 20, 2022
Page 3
Exhibits
4.Please explain to us your consideration of Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K in
determining whether to file as an exhibit the Collaboration and License Agreement with
Radionetics.
            In closing, we remind you that the company and its management are responsible for the
accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or
absence of action by the staff.
            You may contact Ibolya Ignat at 202-551-3636 or Angela Connell at 202-551-3426 with
any questions.
Sincerely,
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Life Sciences