SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust, Inc. (CFTR-PA) (CIK 0001666244) (CFTR-PA) — Jun 7, 2016

Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust, Inc. (CFTR-PA) (CIK 0001666244)
Date: June 7, 2016 · CIK: 0001666244 · Accession: 0000000000-16-079483

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
June 6, 2016
Author
/s/ Kim McManus
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust, Inc. (CFTR-PA) (CIK 0001666244)

Letter

Mailstop 3233 June 6, 2016 Via E -mail Michael Lehrman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc. 110 E. 59th Street New York, NY 10022

Re: Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Draft Registration Statement on Form S -11 Submitted May 12, 2016 CIK No. 0001666244

Dear Mr. Lehrman :

We have reviewed your amended draft registration statement and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by providing the requested information and either submitting an amended draft registration statement or publicly filing your registration statement on EDGAR. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments and your amended draft registration statement or filed registration statement, we may have additional comments.

General

1. We are continuing to evaluate your response to comment 5 and may have further comment.

2. Throughout the prospectus you state that the selling commissions on the Class T shares are limited to 3.0%. The distribution fee, however, is a form of underwriting compensation that you will pay the Dealer Manager for the “distribution” or “sale” of your shares. It appears that the primary dif ference between the “selling commission” and the “distribution fee” is the manner of calculation and timing of payment. If true, please revise your disclosure throughout the prospectus to clarify that the distribution fee is also part of the selling commi ssion.

Michael Lehrman Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc. June 6, 2016 Page 2

3. We note your response to comment 7 of our letter and that you determined that neither CCRE nor RRP is a program for purposes of Guide 5. We further note your disclosure that:

 Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. is the indirect parent of your sponsor and adv isor, and controls Cantor Commercial Real Estate and BGC Partners, Inc. (which includes Newmark Grubb Knight Frank).  Mr. Lehrman, your chairman, was a co -founder of CCRE and served as Co -CEO from April 2014 -2016.

We understand that CCRE was a joint ve nture managed by Cantor and that your chairman was a co -founder and CEO of CCRE. Thus, please provide the disclosure required by Industry Guide 5, including any relevant prior performance disclosure, or provide us with a detailed analysis as to why CCRE n ot should be considered a prior program sponsored by Cantor or its affiliates under Industry Guide 5. We may have further comment.

Prospectus Summary

Compensation to Our Advisor and its Affiliates

Special Units – Rodin Global Access Property Trust OP Holdings, LLC , page 19

4. We note your r esponse to comments 17, 18, and 19 of our letter. It appears that the disclosure in this section relates to two potential forms of compensation: (i) subordinated distributions to the special unit holder equal to 15% o f your net cash flows payable under certain circumstances, and (ii) payments to the special unit holder upon redemption of the special units under certain circumstances. Please revise your disclosure in this section and under the heading “Management Compe nsation” starting on page 84 to describe these two forms of compensation separately, or advise.

5. We note your disclosure in this section stating that the special unit holder will be entitled to receive 15% of your net cash flows after your stockholders h ave received “or are deemed to have received,” in the aggregate, cumulative distributions equal to their invested capital plus a 6% cumulative, non -compounded annual pre -tax return on such invested capital and y our sponsor has received reimbursement for th e payment of certain selling commissions . Please revise to clarify what you mean by “are deemed to have received” and to further elaborate upon how the 6% cumulative, non -compounded annual pre-tax return on invested capital is calculated. Additionally, p lease revise to clarify whether an individual stockholder should expect to receive distributions equal to his or its invested capital plus a 6% cumulative, non -compounded annual pre -tax return on such invested capital prior to payment to the special unit h older of 15% of net cash flows.

Michael Lehrman Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc. June 6, 2016 Page 3

6. We note your response to comment 20 of our letter, and your disclosure in this section stating that the special unit holder will be entitled to receive “15% of the remaining consideration that would be deemed to have been distributed to the holders of the shares of common stock after such holders have received a return of capital and a 6% return on their shares of common stock ” upon the occurrence of certain liquidity events or the termination or non -renewal of the advisory agreement. Please revise to clarify what you mean by “ would be deemed to have been distributed ” and to further elaborate upon how the 6% return is calculated in this context.

7. We note your disclosure in this section, stating “ If the triggering event is the termination or non -renewal of our advisory agreement other than for cause, the enterprise valuation will be calculated based on an appraisal or valuation of our assets. ” We further note your risk factor disclosure under the heading “ Our advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to incentive compensation and sponsor support structure . . .” on page 34, stating “ Upon termination of our advisory agreement for any reason, including for cause, . . . the special unit holder may be entitled to a one -time p ayment upon redemption of the special units (based on an appraisal or valuation of our portfolio) in the event that the special unit holder would have been entitled to a subordinated distribution had the portfolio been liquidated on the termination date ,” as well as similar disclosure on pages 78 -79. Please revise to reconcile these disclosures and to clarify the circumstances when the special unit holder will receive the redemption payment in the event that the advisory agreement is terminated for cause.

Estimated Use of Proceeds, page 67

8. We note your response to comment 23 of our letter. We continue to note that your sponsor can be reimbursed for the selling commissions under certain circumstances in connection with certain liquidity events or upon the termination of the advisory agreement by you or by the advisor. As the contingent reimbursement of selling commissions to your sponsor is a cost to the business, it is our view that these amounts should be reflected in the Use of Proceeds tables. We ther efore respectfully reissue our prior comment. Please ensure that the Use of Proceeds tables deduct the selling commissions without adding them back as “Sponsor Support of Selling Commissions” in computing the amount available for investment given the fact that the sponsor is not gifting this amount to the issuer, but instead will receive a contingent reimbursement right.

9. We note your response to comment 25. Please revise your disclosure in footnote (6), (7) and (5) on pages 68, 70, and 71, respectively, to include the clarification provided in your response and show how you determined the amounts of acquisition fees and acquisition expenses presented in these footnotes.

Michael Lehrman Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc. June 6, 2016 Page 4

Management Compensation, page 84 10. We note your response to comment 27, which seems t o focus on the manner in which you will notif y shareholders of changes to advisory compensation. Please also revise to clarify if the company may increase fees payable to the advisor without shareholder consent.

Plan of Distribution, page 168

11. We note your response to comment 33 and disclosure on page 172 stating that your officers, directors, as well as officers and employees of your sponsor and advisor, etc. may purchase shares in the offering and that “they would expect to hold such shares as stockholders for investment and not for distribution.” Please revise to clarify that they “will hold” such shares for inve stment and not for distribution.

You may contact Jorge L. Bonilla, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3414 or Shannon Sobotka, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3856 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact Bryan Hough, Staff Attorney , at (202) 551-8625 or me at (202) 551 -3215 with any other questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Kim McManus

Show Raw Text
Mailstop 3233
June 6, 2016

Via E -mail
Michael Lehrman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc.
110 E. 59th Street
New York, NY 10022

Re: Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc.
Amendment No. 1 to Draft Registration Statement on Form S -11
Submitted May 12, 2016
  CIK No. 0001666244

Dear Mr. Lehrman :

We have reviewed your amended draft registration statement  and have the following
comments.  In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we
may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by providing the requested information and either submitting
an amended draft registration statement or  publicly  filing your registration statement on
EDGAR.  If you do  not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not
believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these  comments  and your
amended draft registration statement or filed registration statement,  we may have  additional
comments.

General

1. We are continuing to evaluate your response to comment 5 and may have further
comment.

2. Throughout the prospectus you state that the selling commissions on the Class T shares
are limited to 3.0%.  The distribution fee, however, is a form of underwriting
compensation that you will pay the Dealer Manager for the “distribution” or “sale” of
your shares.  It appears that the primary dif ference between the “selling commission” and
the “distribution fee” is the manner of calculation and timing of payment.  If true, please
revise your disclosure throughout the prospectus to clarify that the distribution fee is also
part of the selling commi ssion.

Michael Lehrman
Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc.
June 6, 2016
Page 2

3. We note your response to comment 7 of our letter and that you determined that neither
CCRE nor RRP is a program for purposes of Guide 5.   We further note your disclosure
that:

 Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. is the indirect parent of your sponsor and adv isor, and
controls Cantor Commercial Real Estate and BGC Partners, Inc. (which includes
Newmark Grubb Knight Frank).
 Mr. Lehrman, your chairman, was a co -founder of CCRE and served as Co -CEO
from April 2014 -2016.

We understand that CCRE was a joint ve nture managed by Cantor and that your
chairman was a co -founder and CEO of CCRE.  Thus, please provide the disclosure
required by Industry Guide 5, including any relevant prior performance disclosure, or
provide us with a detailed analysis as to why CCRE n ot should be considered a prior
program sponsored by Cantor or its affiliates under Industry Guide 5.   We may have
further comment.

Prospectus Summary

Compensation to Our Advisor and its Affiliates

Special Units – Rodin Global Access Property Trust OP Holdings, LLC , page 19

4. We note your r esponse to comments 17, 18, and 19 of our letter.  It appears that the
disclosure in this section relates to two potential forms of compensation: (i) subordinated
distributions  to the special unit holder  equal to 15% o f your net cash flows  payable under
certain circumstances, and (ii) payments to the special unit holder upon redemption of the
special units under certain circumstances.  Please revise your disclosure in this section
and under the heading “Management Compe nsation” starting on page 84 to describe
these two forms of compensation separately, or advise.

5. We note your disclosure in this section stating that the special unit holder will be entitled
to receive 15% of your net cash flows after your stockholders h ave received “or are
deemed to have received,” in the aggregate, cumulative distributions equal to their
invested capital plus a 6% cumulative, non -compounded annual pre -tax return on such
invested capital  and y our sponsor has received reimbursement for th e payment of certain
selling commissions .  Please revise to clarify what you mean by “are deemed to have
received” and to further elaborate upon how the 6% cumulative, non -compounded annual
pre-tax return on invested capital  is calculated.  Additionally, p lease revise to clarify
whether an individual stockholder should expect to receive distributions equal to his or its
invested capital plus a 6% cumulative, non -compounded annual pre -tax return on such
invested capital  prior to payment to the special unit h older of 15% of net cash flows.

Michael Lehrman
Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc.
June 6, 2016
Page 3

 6. We note your response to comment 20 of our letter, and your disclosure in this section
stating that the special unit holder will be entitled to receive “15% of the remaining
consideration that would be deemed to have been distributed to the holders of the shares
of common stock after such holders have received a return of capital and a 6% return on
their shares of common stock ” upon the occurrence of certain liquidity events or the
termination or non -renewal of the advisory  agreement.  Please revise to clarify what you
mean by “ would be deemed to have been distributed ” and to further elaborate upon how
the 6% return is calculated in this context.

7. We note your disclosure in this section, stating “ If the triggering event is the termination
or non -renewal of our advisory agreement other than for cause, the enterprise valuation
will be calculated based on an appraisal or valuation of our assets. ”  We further note your
risk factor disclosure under the heading “ Our advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to
incentive compensation and sponsor support structure  . . .” on page 34, stating “ Upon
termination of our advisory agreement for any reason, including for cause, . . . the special
unit holder may be entitled to a one -time p ayment upon redemption of the special units
(based on an appraisal or valuation of our portfolio) in the event that the special unit
holder would have been entitled to a subordinated distribution had the portfolio been
liquidated on the termination date ,” as well as similar disclosure on pages 78 -79.  Please
revise to reconcile these disclosures and to clarify the circumstances when the special
unit holder will receive the redemption payment in the event that the advisory agreement
is terminated for cause.

Estimated Use of Proceeds, page 67

8. We note your response to comment 23 of our letter. We continue to note that your
sponsor can be reimbursed for the selling commissions under certain circumstances in
connection with certain liquidity events or upon the termination of the advisory
agreement by you or by the advisor.  As the contingent reimbursement of selling
commissions to your sponsor is a cost to the business, it is our view that these amounts
should be reflected in the Use of Proceeds tables.  We ther efore respectfully reissue our
prior comment.  Please ensure that the Use of Proceeds tables deduct the selling
commissions without adding them back as “Sponsor Support of Selling Commissions” in
computing the amount available for investment given the fact  that the sponsor is not
gifting this amount to the issuer, but instead will receive a contingent reimbursement
right.

9. We note your response to comment 25. Please revise your disclosure in footnote (6), (7)
and (5) on pages 68, 70, and 71, respectively, to include the clarification provided in your
response and show how you determined the amounts of acquisition fees and acquisition
expenses presented in these footnotes.

Michael Lehrman
Rodin Global Access Property Trust, Inc.
June 6, 2016
Page 4

 Management Compensation, page 84
10. We note your response to comment 27, which seems t o focus on the manner in which you
will notif y shareholders of changes to advisory compensation.  Please also revise to
clarify if the company may increase fees payable to the advisor without shareholder
consent.

Plan of Distribution, page 168

11. We note your response to comment 33 and disclosure on page 172 stating that your
officers, directors, as well as officers and employees of your sponsor and advisor, etc.
may purchase shares in the offering and that “they would expect to hold such shares as
stockholders for investment and not for distribution.”  Please revise to clarify that they
“will hold” such shares for inve stment and not for distribution.

You may contact Jorge L. Bonilla, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3414 or Shannon
Sobotka, Staff  Accountant, at (202) 551 -3856 if you have questions regarding comments on the
financial statements and related matters.  Please contact Bryan Hough, Staff Attorney , at (202)
551-8625  or me at (202) 551 -3215 with any other questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Kim McManus

 Kim McManus
Senior Attorney
Office of Real Estate and
Commodities
cc: Judith D. Fryer, Esq.
Joseph A. Herz, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP