SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0000950170-23-063370 from Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) (CIK 0001674930) (FLGT)

Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) (CIK 0001674930)
Date: Nov. 14, 2023 · CIK: 0001674930 · Accession: 0000950170-23-063370

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 001-37894

Referenced dates: November 1, 2023

Date
November 14, 2023
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) (CIK 0001674930)

Letter

VIA EDGAR Division of Corporation Finance Office of Industrial Applications and Services United States Securities and Exchange Commission Re: Fulgent Genetics, Inc. Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022 Filed February 28, 2023 File No. 001-37894

Dear Ms. Houser and Mr. O’Brien:

On behalf of Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (the “Company”), we are submitting this letter in response to the written comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated November 1, 2023, with respect to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 28, 2023 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Form 10-K”) (File No. 001-37894).

The proposed revised disclosures referenced in this letter are based on facts and circumstances as of the date of this letter and, accordingly, the Company notes that additional revisions may be required in future filings depending on the Company’s strategy, operations, and financial performance at the time of such filing to ensure that the disclosures set forth in such future filings comply with applicable laws, including federal securities laws. The proposed revised and additional disclosures referenced in this response will be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (the “2023 Form 10-K”) and all future applicable filings.

The Company understands that your review and comments are intended to assist them in compliance with applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall quality of the disclosure in their filings. The Company shares these objectives and is responding to your comments with these goals in mind. Set forth below are the heading and text of each comment, followed by the Company’s response.

November 14, 2023

Page 2

Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 54

1.We note that the significant decline in COVID-19 testing revenues has significantly impacted your results of operations for fiscal year 2022. As these revenues are not anticipated to be a material part of your ongoing results of operations, please provide an analysis of the material factors that impact the revenues that are expected to be a material part of your results of operations going forward in comparison to the corresponding revenues for the prior period. Also provide a discussion and analysis of the material factors impacting the associated gross profit for these revenues to provide investors with a better understanding of your future expectations of your operating results with the remaining primary diagnostic testing revenues. When multiple factors are discussed, quantify the extent to which each factor impacted the related operating result line items. Refer to Item 303(b)(2) of Regulation S-K and Section 501.12 of the Financial Reporting Codification for guidance.

Response:

The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that it will, in future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, provide a more comprehensive analysis of the material factors impacting (i) the revenues that are expected to be a material part of the Company’s results of operations going forward in comparison to the corresponding revenues for the prior period and, (ii) to the extent applicable, the associated gross profit for these material revenues to provide investors with a better understanding of the Company’s future expectations of its operating results.

* * *

2.We note that you incur research and development expenses related to your diagnostics testing business and for your therapeutics development business. Please expand your discussion and analysis to quantify the costs for each of your research and development projects and to discuss the nature of the costs incurred for each project.

Response:

The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that it will, in future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, expand its discussion and analysis to quantify the costs for each of its research and development projects and to discuss the nature of the costs incurred for each project. The Company advises the Staff that its total research and development expenses related to the therapeutic development business were not material for the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

* * *

November 14, 2023

Page 3

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets, page 59

3.We note that you recognized $143 million of goodwill and $64.6 million of IPR&D, an indefinite-lived intangible asset, as of December 31, 2022. Please provide a more comprehensive discussion and analysis of the critical estimates associated with assessing goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment. In this regard, we note that the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 is the first time you recognized operating and net losses since the second quarter of fiscal year 2020 due to the significant decline in revenues from COVID-19 testing. Expanded disclosures are to provide investors with sufficient information to assess any material uncertainty regarding the realizability of goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible asset, including but not limited to the following.

•The percentage by which the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying value of your reporting unit(s) or indefinite-lived intangible asset to the extent that the fair value does not substantially exceed the carrying value.

•The methodologies used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit(s) and the indefinite-lived intangible asset for the most recent quantitative assessment, including the material judgements, assumptions and estimates made.

•A discussion of the degree of uncertainty associated with the key assumptions and estimates along with the potential impact reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions would have on your impairment analysis.

•A discussion of the potential events and/or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to occur and negatively affect the key assumptions and result in a material impairment charge.

Refer to Item 303(b)(3) of Regulation S-K and Section 501.14 of the Financial Reporting Codification for guidance.

Response:

The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that it will, in future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, provide a more comprehensive analysis of the critical estimates associated with assessing goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment.

* * *

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Goodwill, page F-13

4.Please expand your accounting policy to disclose the level at which you are testing goodwill for impairment (i.e., the identification of your reporting unit(s)). Also disclose

November 14, 2023

Page 4

when you perform your annual impairment test, the circumstances in which you would perform an interim impairment test, and the method(s) used to estimate the fair value of your reporting unit(s) to the extent that you prepare a quantitative assessment.

Response:

The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and proposes to add in its future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, disclosure of the level at which the Company is testing goodwill for impairment, the circumstances in which the Company would perform an interim impairment test in connection with the annual impairment test, and, to the extent the Company prepares a quantitative assessment, the methods used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s reporting units.

* * *

Reporting Segment and Geographic Information, page F-15

5.We note your disclosure that you view your operations and manage your business in one “reporting segment”. We further note that you acquired Fulgent Pharma, a clinical-stage, therapeutics development company, which differs from your historical clinical diagnostic business. As such, please tell us your consideration of the guidance in ASC 280-10-50-1 through 50-5 for the identification of your operating segments and/or reportable segments.

Response:

The Company respectfully informs the Staff that the following facts outlined below were taken into consideration when the Company was identifying operating segments in accordance with ASC 280-10-50-1, which states that an operating segment is a component of a public entity that has all of the following characteristics:

a.It engages in business activities from which it may recognize revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same public entity).

Characteristic a. was considered, and the Company determined it WAS MET at the component level.

The Company evaluated and identified its clinical diagnostic business and its therapeutic development business as its two components and both components satisfied this characteristic.

The clinical diagnostics component offered molecular diagnostic testing services, comprehensive genetic testing, and anatomic pathology testing. The clinical diagnostics component engaged in business activities from which it recognized revenues and incurred expenses.

November 14, 2023

Page 5

As noted in the Staff’s comment, the Company acquired a clinical-stage, therapeutics development company (“Fulgent Pharma”). Fulgent Pharma is early in its development efforts, with only one therapeutic candidate having entered clinical trials (“FID-007”). The therapeutic development component engaged in business activities from which it incurred expenses related to research and development activities; however, it is pre-revenue and did not recognize any revenue as of December 31, 2022.

b.Its operating results are regularly reviewed by the public entity's chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance.

Characteristic b. was considered, and the Company determined it was NOT MET at the component level but WAS MET at the consolidated level.

In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-5, the Company identified the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company as its chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The CEO made decisions as to funding, structuring, and allocation of resources for the Company as a whole.

It was the Company’s practice to hold regular meetings to review financial performance. The financial package (the “CODM Package”), was prepared at a consolidated level. The consolidated CODM Package was reviewed by the CODM to make operating decisions, allocate resources, and assess the performance of the Company. In these meetings, the CEO reviewed the following:

•a consolidated income statement that included revenue, cost of sales, gross profit (loss), operating expenses, and net income (loss);

•a consolidated balance sheet; and

•a consolidated budget and expenditure report.

During these meetings, the executive officers and other members of management, including members of senior management who oversee business development, sales and marketing, compliance, and research and development (including Dr. Ray Yin in connection with his research and development role at Fulgent Pharma) functions, provided an overview of their respective areas of expertise and responsibility, to provide the CEO additional color and insights as needed relating to the financial performance of the Company.

In these meetings, the CEO reviewed the CODM Package to assess the overall consolidated business performance. The CEO also reviewed the budget at a consolidated level. Compensation was determined at the consolidated level and managed by a centralized human resources team. The consolidated budget along with compensation and resource allocation were presented to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). The Board received the same information that the CEO received and reviewed as the same CODM Package was utilized for the Board meetings. The CEO reviewed and made

November 14, 2023

Page 6

operating decisions to allocate resources and assess the Company’s performance based upon consolidated financials.

Given the Company’s sales outside of the United States, and material revenues since 2020 from COVID-19 testing, the Company also considered whether its operating segments identification might exist on a geographic basis or at the service line or revenue stream level. The CODM did not make resource allocation decisions based upon foreign locations outside of the United States or specifically for COVID-19 testing. The Company concluded that COVID-19 testing is merely another type of diagnostic test that the Company offers. The resources, workflow, and reporting system for its COVID-19 tests are generally the same as the resources, workflow, and reporting system for its regular genetics testing. Therefore, the Company concluded that it did not have any geographic operating segments at this time (although it did comply with the entity wide geographic disclosures in accordance with ASC 280-10-50-41). The Company also concluded that COVID-19 testing was not a separate operating segment.

c.Its discrete financial information is available.

Characteristic c. was considered, and the Company determined it WAS MET at the component level.

Discrete financial information is available at the component level for both its clinical diagnostic business and its therapeutic development business.

Based on the Company’s evaluation of the operating segment characteristics, the Company determined its operating segment identification at the consolidated level and not at the component level. Characteristic b. was NOT MET at the component level, therefore operating segment identification was NOT MET at the component level.

* * *

Note 15. Business Combinations

Fulgent Pharma Holdings, Inc., page F-33

6.We note that you acquired Fulgent Pharma with one drug candidate for which IPR&D of $64.6 million was recognized compared to the purchase price of $68 million. Please address each of the following:

•Provide us with your analysis of the guidance in ASC 805-10-55-5A through 55-5C, including the calculation of the screen test.

•To the extent that you are able to demonstrate the screen test is not met, provide us with your analysis of Fulgent Pharma meeting the definition of a business based on the guidance in ASC 805-10-55.

November 14, 2023

Page 7

Response:

The Company respectfully informs the Staff that the following facts outlined below were taken into consideration when determining whether the acquisition of Fulgent Pharma met the requirements to be treated as a business combination under ASC 805.

ASC 805-10 55-5A provides that if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not considered a business.

The Company considered the assets identified on the November 7, 2022 Fulgent Pharma closing balance sheet, excluding cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, and the combined identifiable assets were as follows: Identified in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) intangible assets consisted of $64.6 million or 89.9%, fixed assets, net, of $1.3 million or 1.8% and goodwill excluding the effects of deferred taxes of $5.9 million or 8.2% of gross assets acquired.

The Company then followed the following steps outlined in ASC 80

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

  CORRESP

 3580 Camel Mountain Road

Suite 300

San Diego, CA  92130

858 314 1500

mintz.com

  November 14, 2023

  VIA EDGAR

  Division of Corporation Finance

  Office of Industrial Applications and Services

  United States Securities and Exchange Commission

  100 F Street, N.E.

  Washington, D.C. 20549-3628

  Attn: Tracey Houser

           Terence O’Brien

  Re: Fulgent Genetics, Inc.

       Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022

       Filed February 28, 2023

       File No. 001-37894

  Dear Ms. Houser and Mr. O’Brien:

  On behalf of Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (the “Company”), we are submitting this letter in response to the written comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated November 1, 2023, with respect to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 28, 2023 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Form 10-K”) (File No. 001-37894).

  The proposed revised disclosures referenced in this letter are based on facts and circumstances as of the date of this letter and, accordingly, the Company notes that additional revisions may be required in future filings depending on the Company’s strategy, operations, and financial performance at the time of such filing to ensure that the disclosures set forth in such future filings comply with applicable laws, including federal securities laws. The proposed revised and additional disclosures referenced in this response will be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (the “2023 Form 10-K”) and all future applicable filings.

  The Company understands that your review and comments are intended to assist them in compliance with applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall quality of the disclosure in their filings. The Company shares these objectives and is responding to your comments with these goals in mind. Set forth below are the heading and text of each comment, followed by the Company’s response.

  November 14, 2023

  Page 2

  Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022

  Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 54

  1.We note that the significant decline in COVID-19 testing revenues has significantly impacted your results of operations for fiscal year 2022.  As these revenues are not anticipated to be a material part of your ongoing results of operations, please provide an analysis of the material factors that impact the revenues that are expected to be a material part of your results of operations going forward in comparison to the corresponding revenues for the prior period.  Also provide a discussion and analysis of the material factors impacting the associated gross profit for these revenues to provide investors with a better understanding of your future expectations of your operating results with the remaining primary diagnostic testing revenues.  When multiple factors are discussed, quantify the extent to which each factor impacted the related operating result line items. Refer to Item 303(b)(2) of Regulation S-K and Section 501.12 of the Financial Reporting Codification for guidance.

  Response:

  The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that it will, in future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, provide a more comprehensive analysis of the material factors impacting (i) the revenues that are expected to be a material part of the Company’s results of operations going forward in comparison to the corresponding revenues for the prior period and, (ii) to the extent applicable, the associated gross profit for these material revenues to provide investors with a better understanding of the Company’s future expectations of its operating results.

  * * *

  2.We note that you incur research and development expenses related to your diagnostics testing business and for your therapeutics development business.  Please expand your discussion and analysis to quantify the costs for each of your research and development projects and to discuss the nature of the costs incurred for each project.

  Response:

  The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that it will, in future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, expand its discussion and analysis to quantify the costs for each of its research and development projects and to discuss the nature of the costs incurred for each project. The Company advises the Staff that its total research and development expenses related to the therapeutic development business were not material for the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

  * * *

  November 14, 2023

  Page 3

  Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

  Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets, page 59

  3.We note that you recognized $143 million of goodwill and $64.6 million of IPR&D, an indefinite-lived intangible asset, as of December 31, 2022.  Please provide a more comprehensive discussion and analysis of the critical estimates associated with assessing goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment.  In this regard, we note that the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 is the first time you recognized operating and net losses since the second quarter of fiscal year 2020 due to the significant decline in revenues from COVID-19 testing.  Expanded disclosures are to provide investors with sufficient information to assess any material uncertainty regarding the realizability of goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible asset, including but not limited to the following.

  •The percentage by which the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying value of your reporting unit(s) or indefinite-lived intangible asset to the extent that the fair value does not substantially exceed the carrying value.

  •The methodologies used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit(s) and the indefinite-lived intangible asset for the most recent quantitative assessment, including the material judgements, assumptions and estimates made.

  •A discussion of the degree of uncertainty associated with the key assumptions and estimates along with the potential impact reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions would have on your impairment analysis.

  •A discussion of the potential events and/or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to occur and negatively affect the key assumptions and result in a material impairment charge.

  Refer to Item 303(b)(3) of Regulation S-K and Section 501.14 of the Financial Reporting Codification for guidance.

  Response:

  The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that it will, in future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, provide a more comprehensive analysis of the critical estimates associated with assessing goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment.

  * * *

  Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  Goodwill, page F-13

  4.Please expand your accounting policy to disclose the level at which you are testing goodwill for impairment (i.e., the identification of your reporting unit(s)).  Also disclose

  November 14, 2023

  Page 4

  when you perform your annual impairment test, the circumstances in which you would perform an interim impairment test, and the method(s) used to estimate the fair value of your reporting unit(s) to the extent that you prepare a quantitative assessment.

  Response:

  The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and proposes to add in its future filings, beginning with the 2023 Form 10-K, disclosure of the level at which the Company is testing goodwill for impairment, the circumstances in which the Company would perform an interim impairment test in connection with the annual impairment test, and, to the extent the Company prepares a quantitative assessment, the methods used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s reporting units.

  * * *

  Reporting Segment and Geographic Information, page F-15

  5.We note your disclosure that you view your operations and manage your business in one “reporting segment”.  We further note that you acquired Fulgent Pharma, a clinical-stage, therapeutics development company, which differs from your historical clinical diagnostic business.  As such, please tell us your consideration of the guidance in ASC 280-10-50-1 through 50-5 for the identification of your operating segments and/or reportable segments.

  Response:

  The Company respectfully informs the Staff that the following facts outlined below were taken into consideration when the Company was identifying operating segments in accordance with ASC 280-10-50-1, which states that an operating segment is a component of a public entity that has all of the following characteristics:

  a.It engages in business activities from which it may recognize revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same public entity).

  Characteristic a. was considered, and the Company determined it WAS MET at the component level.

  The Company evaluated and identified its clinical diagnostic business and its therapeutic development business as its two components and both components satisfied this characteristic.

  The clinical diagnostics component offered molecular diagnostic testing services, comprehensive genetic testing, and anatomic pathology testing. The clinical diagnostics component engaged in business activities from which it recognized revenues and incurred expenses.

  November 14, 2023

  Page 5

  As noted in the Staff’s comment, the Company acquired a clinical-stage, therapeutics development company (“Fulgent Pharma”). Fulgent Pharma is early in its development efforts, with only one therapeutic candidate having entered clinical trials (“FID-007”). The therapeutic development component engaged in business activities from which it incurred expenses related to research and development activities; however, it is pre-revenue and did not recognize any revenue as of December 31, 2022.

  b.Its operating results are regularly reviewed by the public entity's chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance.

  Characteristic b. was considered, and the Company determined it was NOT MET at the component level but WAS MET at the consolidated level.

  In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-5, the Company identified the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company as its chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The CEO made decisions as to funding, structuring, and allocation of resources for the Company as a whole.

  It was the Company’s practice to hold regular meetings to review financial performance. The financial package (the “CODM Package”), was prepared at a consolidated level. The consolidated CODM Package was reviewed by the CODM to make operating decisions, allocate resources, and assess the performance of the Company. In these meetings, the CEO reviewed the following:

  •a consolidated income statement that included revenue, cost of sales, gross profit (loss), operating expenses, and net income (loss);

  •a consolidated balance sheet; and

  •a consolidated budget and expenditure report.

  During these meetings, the executive officers and other members of management, including members of senior management who oversee business development, sales and marketing, compliance, and research and development (including Dr. Ray Yin in connection with his research and development role at Fulgent Pharma) functions, provided an overview of their respective areas of expertise and responsibility, to provide the CEO additional color and insights as needed relating to the financial performance of the Company.

  In these meetings, the CEO reviewed the CODM Package to assess the overall consolidated business performance. The CEO also reviewed the budget at a consolidated level. Compensation was determined at the consolidated level and managed by a centralized human resources team. The consolidated budget along with compensation and resource allocation were presented to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). The Board received the same information that the CEO received and reviewed as the same CODM Package was utilized for the Board meetings. The CEO reviewed and made

  November 14, 2023

  Page 6

  operating decisions to allocate resources and assess the Company’s performance based upon consolidated financials.

  Given the Company’s sales outside of the United States, and material revenues since 2020 from COVID-19 testing, the Company also considered whether its operating segments identification might exist on a geographic basis or at the service line or revenue stream level. The CODM did not make resource allocation decisions based upon foreign locations outside of the United States or specifically for COVID-19 testing. The Company concluded that COVID-19 testing is merely another type of diagnostic test that the Company offers. The resources, workflow, and reporting system for its COVID-19 tests are generally the same as the resources, workflow, and reporting system for its regular genetics testing. Therefore, the Company concluded that it did not have any geographic operating segments at this time (although it did comply with the entity wide geographic disclosures in accordance with ASC 280-10-50-41). The Company also concluded that COVID-19 testing was not a separate operating segment.

  c.Its discrete financial information is available.

  Characteristic c. was considered, and the Company determined it WAS MET at the component level.

  Discrete financial information is available at the component level for both its clinical diagnostic business and its therapeutic development business.

  Based on the Company’s evaluation of the operating segment characteristics, the Company determined its operating segment identification at the consolidated level and not at the component level.  Characteristic b. was NOT MET at the component level, therefore operating segment identification was NOT MET at the component level.

  * * *

  Note 15. Business Combinations

  Fulgent Pharma Holdings, Inc., page F-33

  6.We note that you acquired Fulgent Pharma with one drug candidate for which IPR&D of $64.6 million was recognized compared to the purchase price of $68 million.  Please address each of the following:

  •Provide us with your analysis of the guidance in ASC 805-10-55-5A through 55-5C, including the calculation of the screen test.

  •To the extent that you are able to demonstrate the screen test is not met, provide us with your analysis of Fulgent Pharma meeting the definition of a business based on the guidance in ASC 805-10-55.

  November 14, 2023

  Page 7

  Response:

  The Company respectfully informs the Staff that the following facts outlined below were taken into consideration when determining whether the acquisition of Fulgent Pharma met the requirements to be treated as a business combination under ASC 805.

  ASC 805-10 55-5A provides that if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not considered a business.

  The Company considered the assets identified on the November 7, 2022 Fulgent Pharma closing balance sheet, excluding cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, and the combined identifiable assets were as follows:  Identified in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) intangible assets consisted of $64.6 million or 89.9%, fixed assets, net, of $1.3 million or 1.8% and goodwill excluding the effects of deferred taxes of $5.9 million or 8.2% of gross assets acquired.

  The Company then followed the following steps outlined in ASC 80