SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Brighthouse Financial, (BHF) — Dec 20, 2016

Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
Date: Dec. 20, 2016 · CIK: 0001685040 · Accession: 0000000000-16-105771

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 001-37905

Date
December 20, 2016
Author
/s/ Suzanne Hayes
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.

Letter

Mail Stop 4546 December 20, 2016 Anant Bhalla Chief Financial Officer Brighthouse Financial, Inc. Gragg Building 11225 North Community House Road Charlotte, N C 28277

Re: Brighthouse Financial, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-12B Filed December 6, 2016 File No. 001-37905

Dear Mr. Bhalla :

We have reviewed your amended filing an d have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments within ten busine ss days by providing the requested information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response and any amendment you may file in response to these comments , we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our November 3, 2016 letter .

Exhibit 99.1 – Information Statement

Summary

The Distribution, page 15

1. We note your responses to our prior comments two and four. Please revise your disclosure here and elsewhere, as appropriate, to provide information about the amount you will need to ensure that you have adequate liquidity, to achieve a 20% debt to capital ratio and to ensure that you have $3 billion in assets in excess of CTE95.

2. With respect to the “borrowings in excess of the amounts needed to satisfy the Company’s goals,” is it your intention to draw down the entire $5 billion available and

Anant Bhalla Brighthouse Financial, Inc. December 20 , 2016 Page 2

pay the excess to MetLife as a dividend or partial consideration for MetLife’s transfer of assets? What factors will you consider in determining whether the payment will be a dividend or consideration? If you consider this a dividend, will you still be obligated to pay MetLife consideration for the transfer of assets? Please quantify the consideration you are obligated to pay MetLife for the tran sfer of assets.

Risk Factors

We may experience difficulty in marketing and distributing products through our distribution channels, page 59

3. We note your revised disclosure in response to our prior comment six and reissue the comment in part. Please i dentify the significant distributor that has elected to suspend its distribution relationship with you.

The Separation and Distribution

Reasons for the Distribution, p age 71

4. We note your response to our prior comment seven . Please revise your disclosure to clarify your belief that the sale of the former Retail segment’s proprietary distribution channel to Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company reduced the applicability of the vast majority of the DOL Fiduciary Rule prov isions. To the extent that there are any provisions that continue to apply, please provide further explanation of their potential impact on your business.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution, page 76

5. We note your disclosur e on pages 18 and 66 that you could have an indemnification obligation to MetLife if certain steps that are part of the separation do not qualify for their intended tax treatment. Please clarify if you are referring to steps that are not covered by the pr ivate letter ruling from the IRS; the possibility that that you are unable to obtain a private letter ruling from the IRS; or the possibility that it is determined you are not in compliance with representations, assumptions and covenants. If the restructu ring transactions are not covered by the private letter ruling, please expand your discussion to explain that the private letter ruling does not apply to these restructuring transactions and discuss the expected tax treatment and potential liability. If you expect that the restructuring transactions are not taxable, provide the basis for your belief.

Anant Bhalla Brighthouse Financial, Inc. December 20 , 2016 Page 3

Formation of Brighthouse and the Restructuring

Brighthouse, page 86

6. We note your revised disclosure in response to our prior comment nine. Please quantif y the MetLife liabilities you intend to assume.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates

Liability for Future Policy Benefits, page 98

7. We continue to evaluate your re sponse to prior comment 11. In your response, you indicate that that the change in GMIB assumptions represents a change in accounting estimate pursuant to ASC 250 that results in a change in your accounting measurement model for GMIBs. Please:

 Provide us a detailed explanation of how your accounting change meets each component of the definition of a change in estimate in ASC 250 -10-20.  To the extent you have fully supported your accounting, revise your disclosure to characterize the change as a change in estimate and remove all references to an accounting shift.

Financial Statements

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

1.Business, Basis of Presentation, and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page F -12

8. We have reviewed your response to prior comment 18. Since Brighthouse was not incorporated until August 1, 2016, we do not believe it is appropriate, for periods as of or ended before August 1, 2016, to label the historical financial statements and notes as Brighthouse or including Brighthouse, or to refer to the historical financial results presented in the summary and sele cted combined financial data and MD&A as Brighthouse or including Brighthouse. Likewise, we do not believe Brighthouse should be referenced as a combined entity in your independent auditor’s report on page F - 5. Please revise accordingly.

We remind you that the company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff.

Anant Bhalla Brighthouse Financial, Inc. December 20 , 2016 Page 4

You may contact Bonnie Baynes at (202) 551 -4924 or Sharon Blume at (202) 551 -3474 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact Irene Paik at (202) 551 -6553 or me at (202) 551-3675 with any other questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Suzanne Hayes

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 4546
December 20, 2016

Anant Bhalla
Chief Financial Officer
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
Gragg Building
11225 North Community House Road
Charlotte, N C 28277

Re: Brighthouse  Financial, Inc.
 Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-12B
Filed December 6, 2016
File No. 001-37905

Dear Mr. Bhalla :

We have reviewed your amended filing an d have the following comments.  In some of
our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your
disclosure.

Please respond to these comments  within ten busine ss days by providing the requested
information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response and any amendment you may file in response to these
comments , we may have  additional comments.   Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior
comments are to comments in our November 3, 2016 letter .

Exhibit 99.1 – Information Statement

Summary

The Distribution, page 15

1. We note your responses to our prior comments two and four.  Please revise your
disclosure here and elsewhere, as appropriate, to provide  information about the amount
you will need to ensure that you have adequate liquidity, to achieve a 20% debt to capital
ratio and to ensure that you have $3 billion in assets in excess of CTE95.

2. With respect to the “borrowings in excess of the amounts needed to satisfy the
Company’s goals,” is it your intention to draw down the entire $5 billion available and

Anant Bhalla
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
December 20 , 2016
Page 2

 pay the excess to MetLife as a dividend or partial consideration for MetLife’s transfer of
assets?  What factors will you consider in determining whether the payment will be a
dividend or consideration?  If you consider this a dividend, will you still be obligated to
pay MetLife consideration for the transfer of assets?  Please quantify the consideration
you are obligated to pay MetLife for the tran sfer of assets.

Risk Factors

We may experience difficulty in marketing and distributing products through our distribution
channels, page 59

3. We note your revised disclosure in response to our prior comment six and reissue the
comment in part.  Please i dentify the significant distributor that has elected to suspend its
distribution relationship with you.

The Separation and Distribution

Reasons for the Distribution, p age 71

4. We note your response to our prior comment seven .  Please revise your disclosure to
clarify your belief that the sale of the former Retail segment’s proprietary distribution
channel to Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company reduced the applicability of
the vast majority of the DOL Fiduciary Rule prov isions.  To the extent that there are any
provisions that continue to apply, please provide further explanation of their potential
impact on your business.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution, page 76

5. We note your disclosur e on pages 18 and 66 that you could have an indemnification
obligation to MetLife if certain steps that are part of the separation do not qualify for their
intended tax treatment.  Please clarify if you are referring to steps that are not covered by
the pr ivate letter ruling from the IRS; the possibility that that you are unable to obtain a
private letter ruling from the IRS; or the possibility that it is determined you are not in
compliance with representations, assumptions and covenants.  If the restructu ring
transactions are not covered by the private letter ruling, please expand your discussion to
explain that the private letter ruling does not apply to these restructuring transactions and
discuss the expected tax treatment and potential liability.   If you expect that the
restructuring transactions are not taxable, provide the basis for your belief.

Anant Bhalla
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
December 20 , 2016
Page 3

 Formation of Brighthouse and the Restructuring

Brighthouse, page 86

6. We note your revised disclosure in response to our prior comment nine.  Please quantif y
the MetLife liabilities you intend to assume.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates

Liability for Future Policy Benefits, page 98

7. We continue to evaluate your re sponse to prior comment 11.  In your response, you
indicate that that the change in GMIB assumptions represents a change in accounting
estimate pursuant to ASC 250 that results in a change in your accounting measurement
model for GMIBs.  Please:

 Provide us a detailed explanation of how your accounting change meets each
component of the definition of a change in estimate in ASC 250 -10-20.
 To the extent you have fully supported your accounting, revise your disclosure to
characterize the change as  a change in estimate and remove all references to an
accounting shift.

Financial Statements

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

1.Business, Basis of Presentation, and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page F -12

8. We have reviewed your response to prior comment 18.   Since Brighthouse was not
incorporated until August 1, 2016, we do not  believe it is appropriate, for periods as of or
ended before August 1, 2016, to label the historical financial statements and notes as
Brighthouse or including Brighthouse, or  to refer to the historical financial results
presented in the summary and sele cted combined financial data and MD&A as
Brighthouse or including Brighthouse.   Likewise, we do not believe Brighthouse should
be referenced as a combined entity in your independent auditor’s report on page F -
5.  Please revise accordingly.

We remind you that the company and its management are responsible for the accuracy
and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of
action  by the staff.

Anant Bhalla
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
December 20 , 2016
Page 4

 You may contact Bonnie Baynes  at (202) 551 -4924 or Sharon Blume  at (202) 551 -3474
if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters.
Please contact Irene Paik at (202) 551 -6553 or me at (202) 551-3675 with any other  questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Suzanne Hayes

Suzanne Hayes
Assistant Director
Office of Healthcare and Insurance

cc: Benjamin Nixon
 Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP