SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0001692951-23-000157 from Cottonwood Communities, Inc. (CIK 0001692951)

Cottonwood Communities, Inc. (CIK 0001692951)
Date: Sept. 13, 2023 · CIK: 0001692951 · Accession: 0001692951-23-000157

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 000-56165

Date
September 13, 2023
Author
By: /s/ Adam Larson
Form
CORRESP
Company
Cottonwood Communities, Inc. (CIK 0001692951)

Letter

Division of Corporation Finance Office of Real Estate & Construction Re: Cottonwood Communities, Inc. (the "Company," "we," "our," or "us") Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 Filed March 24, 2023 File No. 000-56165

Dear Ms. Monick and Mr. Efron:

We are writing in response to the request to file on EDGAR as correspondence an e-mail requesting additional guidance from the Staff sent by the Company to Mr. Efron on Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:19 PM mountain time. The e-mail is included in its entirety as follows:

Hi Howard,

Thanks for having the call with us today. We had an internal call with the executive team and had a few questions we weren’t certain on. With our 8-k obligation coming up very shortly, could we discuss these thoughts with Jen and you tomorrow on a call? We are available after 10 AM EST.

1.If 1Q22 is material ($1.5M), would we need to restate the first quarter 2023 in a 10-Q/A as the current year number would not change but the prior period cash from ops in the 1Q23 10-Q is now considered materially incorrect?

2.1% of cash flow from ops was mentioned as an expectation of a number that would be immaterial. With cash from ops, does the percentage have more weight than the number itself? One percent at 1Q22 is $148K compared to the error of $1.5M. We also had no distributions sourced from cash from ops in 1Q22 as cash from ops was negative that quarter, so that disclosure would not change either way.

3.From our conversations, we understand if we did call 2Q22 material, we wouldn’t need to restate 2Q23 because (even though we say it’s immaterial in that filing), the numbers are correct and the error is disclosed. Should the answer to the first question be yes (we would need to restate 1Q23 because we called 1Q22 material), would that change the earlier thought on not needing to restate 2Q23 as you’d now have a 10-Q/A for 1Q23 and not one for 2Q23?

4.We discussed a “Super 10-K” approach on disclosing the quarterly adjustments. This would cover what we needed for the 10-Q’s and would be similar to the example we sent you. Our SEC counsel is saying we should be able to consult with you and get clearance on that approach. In our conversation it was mentioned that putting the quarters in the 10-K would be a minimum expectation, but it was left open on restating the 10-Q’s themselves. Is getting clearance on the “super 10-K” approach something we can do?

Jennifer Monick

Howard Efron

Securities & Exchange Commission

September 13, 2023

Page 2

I apologize if we may have talked about some of these points already, but we hope to clear this together with you so we can resume our offering as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Nate Easthope | Senior Vice President, Accounting and Financial Reporting

If you need any additional information, or if the Company can be of any further assistance, please call me at 801.826.4996.

Sincerely,
Cottonwood Communities, Inc.

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Document

September 13, 2023

Jennifer Monick

Howard Efron

Division of Corporation Finance

Office of Real Estate & Construction

Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street NE

Washington, DC 20549

Re:    Cottonwood Communities, Inc. (the "Company," "we," "our," or "us")

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022

Filed March 24, 2023

File No. 000-56165

Dear Ms. Monick and Mr. Efron:

We are writing in response to the request to file on EDGAR as correspondence an e-mail requesting additional guidance from the Staff sent by the Company to Mr. Efron on Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 8:19 PM mountain time. The e-mail is included in its entirety as follows:

Hi Howard,

Thanks for having the call with us today. We had an internal call with the executive team and had a few questions we weren’t certain on. With our 8-k obligation coming up very shortly, could we discuss these thoughts with Jen and you tomorrow on a call?  We are available after 10 AM EST.

1.If 1Q22 is material ($1.5M), would we need to restate the first quarter 2023 in a 10-Q/A as the current year number would not change but the prior period cash from ops in the 1Q23 10-Q is now considered materially incorrect?

2.1% of cash flow from ops was mentioned as an expectation of a number that would be immaterial. With cash from ops, does the percentage have more weight than the number itself?  One percent at 1Q22 is $148K compared to the error of $1.5M. We also had no distributions sourced from cash from ops in 1Q22 as cash from ops was negative that quarter, so that disclosure would not change either way.

3.From our conversations, we understand if we did call 2Q22 material, we wouldn’t need to restate 2Q23 because (even though we say it’s immaterial in that filing), the numbers are correct and the error is disclosed. Should the answer to the first question be yes (we would need to restate 1Q23 because we called 1Q22 material), would that change the earlier thought on not needing to restate 2Q23 as you’d now have a 10-Q/A for 1Q23 and not one for 2Q23?

4.We discussed a “Super 10-K” approach on disclosing the quarterly adjustments. This would cover what we needed for the 10-Q’s and would be similar to the example we sent you. Our SEC counsel is saying we should be able to consult with you and get clearance on that approach. In our conversation it was mentioned that putting the quarters in the 10-K would be a minimum expectation, but it was left open on restating the 10-Q’s themselves. Is getting clearance on the “super 10-K” approach something we can do?

Jennifer Monick

Howard Efron

Securities & Exchange Commission

September 13, 2023

Page 2

I apologize if we may have talked about some of these points already, but we hope to clear this together with you so we can resume our offering as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Nate Easthope | Senior Vice President, Accounting and Financial Reporting

If you need any additional information, or if the Company can be of any further assistance, please call me at 801.826.4996.

Sincerely,

Cottonwood Communities, Inc.

By: /s/ Adam Larson

Name: Adam Larson

Title: Chief Financial Officer

cc: Laura Sirianni, Esq.

 DLA Piper LLP (US)