SEC Company Response from Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT) (CIK 0001701756) (SDOT) — Jan 24, 2020
Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT) (CIK 0001701756)
Date: Jan. 24, 2020 · CIK: 0001701756 · Accession: 0001493152-20-001116
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-235283
Referenced dates: January 22, 2020
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
MUSCLE
MAKER, INC.
308
East Renfro Street, Suite 101
Burleson,
Texas 76028
(682)
708-8250
January
24, 2020
Via
Edgar
Scott
Anderegg, Staff Attorney
United
State Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
Muscle
Maker, Inc.
Amendment
No. 3 and 4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed
January 10 and 13, 2020
File
No. 333-235283
Dear
Mr. Anderegg:
The
following responses address the comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission as set
forth in its letter dated January 22, 2020 (the “Comment Letter”) relating to the Amendment No. 3 and 4 to Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed January 10 and 13, 2020 (the “Registration Statement”) of Muscle Maker Inc. (the “Company”).
For
the Staff’s convenience, the Staff’s comments have been stated below in their entirety in bold, followed by the corresponding
responses from the Company.
Amendment
No. 4 to Form S-1 Filed January 13, 2020
Use
of Proceeds, page 33
1.
Consistent
with information contained in the notes to the financial statements, please revise to describe the $550,000 of debt intended
to be repaid with proceeds of the offering. For clarity, include the interest rate and maturity date associated with the debt.
If the debt to be repaid was incurred within one year, describe the use of the proceeds of such indebtedness other than short-term
borrowings used for working capital. Refer to Instruction 4 of Item 504 of Regulation S-K.
Response
We
have revised the “Use of Proceeds” section on pages 33 and 34 to describe the $550,000 in debt to be repaid including
the interest rate, maturity date, the date such debt was incurred and the use of proceeds associated with such debt.
Capitalization,
page 34
2.
You
disclose the “pro forma as adjusted” column gives effect to the offering. However, it does not appear the “Cash
and cash equivalents” and “Total debt at face value” amounts in the “Pro Forma As Adjusted”
column reflect the $550,000 debt intended to be repaid with the proceeds of the offering as disclosed in “Use of Proceeds.”
Please clarify for us, and revise as appropriate.
Response
We
have revised the entries in the “Pro Forma as Adjusted” column on page 35 to reflect the repayment of the $550,000
in debt.
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Period Ended September 30, 2019
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note
12- Notes Payable, page F-18
3.
Please
ensure consistency with the information in this note to the related debt amounts presented on the balance sheet as of September
30, 2019. For example, the total face value of debt and discounts presented on the balance sheet appear to be $10,311,458
and $1,340,590, respectively, whereas the respective total amounts in the note appear to be $7,914,000 and $1,096,374. Additionally,
descriptions of the debt on the balance sheet do not appear to be the same as in the note.
Response
We
have revised Note 12 to provide that the debt amounts presented on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2019 are consistent with
the information presented in Note 12.
4.
Additionally,
please ensure consistency with the information in this note to that in note 16 on page F-28. For example, it appears a total
face value of $4,688,000 of SPA notes and $1,375,000 of other convertible notes is disclosed as converted in note 16 but the
total face value of SPA notes and other convertible notes outstanding in note 12 appears to be only $2,973,000 and $1,350,000,
respectively. In view of the preceding, please consider providing information in note 16 of the face value amount outstanding
after conversion for each debt converted that together with information in note 12 enables investors to readily associate
the total face value of debt outstanding after conversion in the capitalization table.
Response
We
have revised Note 16 to ensure consistence with the information in this note is consistent with the information presented in Note
12.
**********************
Please
do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions or comments. Thank you.
Sincerely,
/s/
Ferdinand Groenewald
Ferdinand
Groenewald, CFO
cc:
Stephen
M. Fleming, Esq.