Correspondence 0001104659-24-011693 from Theseus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CIK 0001745020)
Theseus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CIK 0001745020)
Date: Feb. 7, 2024 · CIK: 0001745020 · Accession: 0001104659-24-011693
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: February 2, 2024, January 22, 2024
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Goodwin Procter LLP
100 Northern Avenue
Boston, MA 02210
goodwinlaw.com
+1 617 570 1000
February 7, 2024
VIA EDGAR
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Mergers and Acquisitions
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549-3628
Attention:
Shane Callaghan
Christina Chalk
Re:
Theseus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Schedule 14D-9/A filed January 30, 2024
File No. 005-92944
Dear Mr. Callaghan and Ms. Chalk:
This letter (this “Response
Letter”) is submitted on behalf of Theseus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) in response
to comments from the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Commission”) in a letter dated February 2, 2024 (the “Comment Letter”)
with respect to the Company’s Schedule 14D-9/A (File No. 005-92944), filed with the Commission on January 30, 2024, which
amended and supplemented the Company’s Schedule 14D-9 filed with the Commission on January 10, 2024 (the “Schedule
14D-9”). The Company is concurrently filing Amendment No. 2 to the Schedule 14D-9 (“Amendment No. 2”),
which includes changes in response to certain of the Staff’s comments and makes certain other updates to the Schedule 14D-9.
For your convenience, the
Staff’s numbered comments set forth in the Comment Letter have been reproduced in bold and italics herein with responses immediately
following each comment. Unless otherwise indicated, page references in the descriptions of the Staff’s comments refer to the
Schedule 14D-9 and page references in the responses below refer to the Amendment No. 2. Defined terms used herein but not otherwise
defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Amendment No. 2.
The Solicitation or Recommendation, page 12
1. We reissue in part prior comment
2 in our letter dated January 22, 2024. While you have clarified that the Company decided
to pursue strategic alternatives other than a reverse merger transaction in early November 2023,
please specify the “changes in market conditions” that led to this change in
strategy.
Response: The Company respectfully
advises the Staff that it has provided the requested disclosure on page 2 of the Amendment No. 2 in response to the Staff’s
comment.
Page 2
2. We reissue prior comment 6 in our
letter dated January 22, 2024. Please revise the section entitled ‘Theseus Management
Dissolution Analysis’ to summarize the material assumptions and limitations of management’s
dissolution analysis, including but not limited to: (i) why management assumed that
70% of the available cash would be disbursed to stockholders at the commencement of the dissolution
process, (ii) how management considered several uncertain factors (such as those described
on page 23 of the Schedule 14D-9) in assuming that 75% of the remaining portion of cash
would be available for later distribution, and (iii) how management calculated the 5.0%
discount rate.
Response: The Company respectfully
advises the Staff that it has provided the requested disclosure on page 3 of the Amendment No. 2 in response to the Staff’s
comment.
If you have any questions
or would like further information concerning the Company’s responses to your Comment Letter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at BLiggio@goodwinlaw.com or (617) 570-1622.
Sincerely,
/s/ Blake Liggio
Blake Liggio
CC: Bradford D. Dahms, President
and Chief Financial Officer
Theseus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Blake Liggio, Esq.
Robert Puopolo, Esq.
Goodwin Procter LLP