SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) (CIK 0001751876) (PAVS) — May 3, 2019

Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) (CIK 0001751876)
Date: May 3, 2019 · CIK: 0001751876 · Accession: 0001213900-19-007828

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
May 3, 2019
Author
Xuezhu Wang
Form
CORRESP
Company
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) (CIK 0001751876)

Letter

VIA EDGAR Division of Corporation Finance Office of Healthcare & Insurance Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form F-1 Submitted April 18, 2019 CIK No. 0001751876

Dear Ms. Breslin:

Happiness Biotech Group Ltd. (the “Company”, “Happiness,” “we”, “us” or “our”) hereby transmits its response to the letter received from the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated April 30, 2019 regarding our Amendment No.2 to Registration Statement on Form F-1 (the “Amendment No. 2”) previously submitted on April 18, 2019. For ease of reference, we have repeated the Commission’s comments in this response and numbered them accordingly. An amended F-1 submitted publicly accompanying this Response Letter is referred to as Amendment No. 3.

Please note that new language we are including in Amendment No. 3 pursuant to your comments, is indicated in this letter in bold, italicized font; any deletions from the initial Registration Statement are indicated in this letter as strikethrough font.

Cover Page

1. We note your revised disclosures and response to prior comment 1 that your secondary offering will be delayed by 60 days and that therefore the primary and secondary offerings will not be concurrent, and that following the 60 days, the selling shareholder will sell at market or negotiated prices. However, you state that your primary offering is for 120 days, and could be extended by an additional 60 days. As there is a period of time when the two offerings will be concurrent, please add a risk factor addressing the possibility that the secondary offering could hinder your ability to raise funds in your best efforts primary offering. In addition, please restore the risk factor that the prices in the two offerings could differ. Also revise the cover page and the Selling Shareholder Plan of Distribution to clarify that the selling shareholder may sell at market or negotiated prices only after there is an established market for your shares, and the fixed price at which the resales will occur before there is such a market.

Response: As orally discussed with the Staff, we have revised the disclosures on the cover page and in the relevant risk factor and the Selling Shareholder Plan of Distribution to indicate the selling shareholder has agreed not to offer or sell any shares until after the primary offering closes and the Ordinary Share is listed on NASDAQ. As such, the two offering will not be concurrent. We have restored the risk factor, after relevant revision, stating that the prices in the two offerings could differ on page 19.

Risk Factors

Our Memorandum and Articles of Association afford less protection to our shareholders and may discourage claims..., page

2. We note your revision in response to prior comment 3. Please expand to disclose whether the provision in Section 161(2) applies to federal securities claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933.

Response: In response to Staff’s comment, we have revised the risk factor on page 13.

Exhibits

3. We acknowledge the revised Exhibit 5.1 opinion filed in response to prior comment 9. However, Section 1.5 continues to assume material facts related to the valid issuance opinion as it assumes the accuracy and completeness of all facts and representations made in documents reviewed by counsel. In addition, the newly added Section 1.6 and the second clause of newly added Section 1.7 also contain inappropriate assumptions related to the valid issuance opinion. Please file an amended opinion without these assumptions.

Response: In response to Staff’s comment, we have revised the relevant sections of the Exhibit 5.1 opinion.

We thank the Staff for its review of the foregoing. If you have further comments, we ask that you forward them by electronic mail to our counsel, Joan Wu at jwu@htflawyers.com or by telephone at (212) 530-2208.

Very
truly yours,
/s/
Xuezhu Wang

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Happiness
Biotech Group Ltd

No.
11, Dongjiao East Road

Shuangxi,
Shunchang, Nanping City

Fujian
Province, P.R.C.

May
3, 2019

VIA
EDGAR

Mary
Beth Breslin

U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission

Division
of Corporation Finance

Office
of Healthcare & Insurance

100
F Street, N.E.

Mail
Stop 4631

Washington,
DC 20549

 Re: Happiness
                                         Biotech Group Ltd

Amendment
No. 2 to

Registration
Statement on Form F-1

Submitted
April 18, 2019

CIK
No. 0001751876

Dear
Ms. Breslin:

Happiness
Biotech Group Ltd. (the “Company”, “Happiness,” “we”, “us”
or “our”) hereby transmits its response to the letter received from the staff (the “Staff”)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated April 30, 2019 regarding our Amendment
No.2 to Registration Statement on Form F-1 (the “Amendment No. 2”) previously submitted on April 18, 2019.
For ease of reference, we have repeated the Commission’s comments in this response and numbered them accordingly. An amended
F-1 submitted publicly accompanying this Response Letter is referred to as Amendment No. 3.

Please
note that new language we are including in Amendment No. 3 pursuant to your comments, is indicated in this letter in bold, italicized
font; any deletions from the initial Registration Statement are indicated in this letter as strikethrough font.

Cover
Page

1.
We note your revised disclosures and response to prior comment 1 that your secondary offering will be delayed by 60 days and
that therefore the primary and secondary offerings will not be concurrent, and that following the 60 days, the selling
shareholder will sell at market or negotiated prices. However, you state that your primary offering is for 120 days, and
could be extended by an additional 60 days. As there is a period of time when the two offerings will be concurrent, please
add a risk factor addressing the possibility that the secondary offering could hinder your ability to raise funds in your
best efforts primary offering. In addition, please restore the risk factor that the prices in the two offerings could differ.
Also revise the cover page and the Selling Shareholder Plan of Distribution to clarify that the selling shareholder may sell
at market or negotiated prices only after there is an established market for your shares, and the fixed price at which the
resales will occur before there is such a market.

Response:
As orally discussed with the Staff, we have revised the disclosures on the cover page and in the relevant risk factor and
the Selling Shareholder Plan of Distribution to indicate the selling shareholder has agreed not to offer or sell any shares until
after the primary offering closes and the Ordinary Share is listed on NASDAQ. As such, the two offering will not be concurrent.
We have restored the risk factor, after relevant revision, stating that the prices in the two offerings could differ on page 19.

Risk
Factors

Our
Memorandum and Articles of Association afford less protection to our shareholders and may discourage claims..., page
13

2.
We note your revision in response to prior comment 3. Please expand to disclose whether the provision in Section 161(2)
applies to federal securities claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933.

Response:
In response to Staff’s comment, we have revised the risk factor on page 13.

Exhibits

3.
We acknowledge the revised Exhibit 5.1 opinion filed in response to prior comment 9. However, Section 1.5 continues to assume
material facts related to the valid issuance opinion as it assumes the accuracy and completeness of all facts and
representations made in documents reviewed by counsel. In addition, the newly added Section 1.6 and the second clause of
newly added Section 1.7 also contain inappropriate assumptions related to the valid issuance opinion. Please file an amended
opinion without these assumptions.

Response:
In response to Staff’s comment, we have revised the relevant sections of the Exhibit 5.1 opinion.

We
thank the Staff for its review of the foregoing. If you have further comments, we ask that you forward them by electronic mail
to our counsel, Joan Wu at jwu@htflawyers.com or by telephone at (212) 530-2208.

    Very
    truly yours,

    /s/
    Xuezhu Wang

    Xuezhu
        Wang

        CEO

    cc:
    Joan
    Wu

    Hunter
    Taubman Fischer & Li LLC