Correspondence 0001999371-24-007764 from Kurv ETF Trust (CIK 0001782952)
Kurv ETF Trust (CIK 0001782952)
Date: June 25, 2024 · CIK: 0001782952 · Accession: 0001999371-24-007764
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-233633, 811-23473
Referenced dates: June 14, 2024
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
The Atlantic Building
950 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1404
202-239-3300 | Fax: 202-239-3333
David J. Baum
Direct Dial: 202-239-3346
Email: David.Baum@alston.com
June 25, 2024
VIA E-mail and EDGAR
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549
Attn: Ryan Sutcliffe
Re:
Kurv ETF Trust (the “Trust” or “Registrant”)
Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the Trust’s
Registration Statement on
Form N-1A, filed on March 22, 2024
File Numbers 333-233633, 811-23473
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is in response
to the supplemental comments provided by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) by phone (the
“Comments”) on June 21, 2024, relating to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 (“PEA No. 11”) to the Trust’s
Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on March 22, 2024, regarding the Kurv Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (the “Fund”),
a series of the Trust, and the response letter to the Staff’s comments on PEA No. 11 dated June 14, 2024 (the “June 14 Comment
Response Letter”). The prospectus (the “Prospectus”) and statement of additional information (“SAI,” and
together with the Prospectus, the “Documents”) contained in the Registration Statement will be updated in response to the
Staff’s Comments and a revised post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement reflecting these changes will be filed subsequent
to this correspondence.
Alston & Bird LLP
www.alston.com
Atlanta | Beijing | Brussels
| Charlotte | Dallas | Los Angeles | New York | Research Triangle | San Francisco | Silicon Valley | Washington, D.C.
June 25, 2024
Page 2
Prospectus
Cover
Comment #1
With respect to the response
to Comment #2 in the June 14 Comment Response Letter, please supplementally confirm that the option income strategy is another aspect
considered to be “enhanced” as part of the Fund’s name/strategy.
Response #1
The Registrant confirms that the Fund is considered
“enhanced” compared to traditional cash management funds because of its option income strategy in addition to other factors
such the Fund having slightly higher maturity/duration and credit risk to generate higher yield.
SAI
Investment Restrictions and Policies
– Fundamental Policies
Comment #18
With respect to the response to Comment # 18
in the June 14 Comment Response Letter, the quoted language regarding the revised investment restriction ends on the word “and”.
Please complete this section so that the Staff may see the complete change.
Response #18
The Registrant notes that the “and”
is used as a lead in to the existing eighth and final fundamental investment policy in a list of eight enumerated policies. Please see
below:
7. The Fund may not concentrate its investments in a particular industry,
as that term is used in the 1940 Act, and as interpreted, modified, or otherwise permitted by regulatory authority having jurisdiction,
from time to time. invest 25% or more of the market value
of its assets in the securities of companies engaged in any one industry or group of industries. This limitation does not apply to investment
in the securities of the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities; and
8. The Fund may not, with respect to 75% of the Fund’s total assets, purchase the securities of any
issuer, except securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities or securities issued
by other investment companies, if, as a result (i) more than 5% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in the securities of
that issuer, or (ii) the Fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of that issuer. For the purpose of this restriction,
each state and each separate political subdivision, agency, authority or instrumentality of such state, each multi-state agency or authority,
and each guarantor, if any, are treated as separate issuers of Municipal Bonds.
* * *
If you have any further
questions, comments or informational requests relating to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 239-3346.
Sincerely,
/s/ David J. Baum
David J. Baum