SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Mystic Holdings (MSTH) — Dec 3, 2020

Mystic Holdings Inc./NV (MSTH) (CIK 0001790320)
Date: Dec. 3, 2020 · CIK: 0001790320 · Accession: 0001493152-20-022925

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 024-11093

Referenced dates: November 23, 2020

Date
November 6, 2020
Author
Spencer G. Feldman
Form
CORRESP
Company
Mystic Holdings Inc./NV (MSTH) (CIK 0001790320)

Letter

EMAIL: SFeldman@olshanlaw.com

DIRECT DIAL: 212.451.2234

December 3, 2020

VIA EDGAR AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attn.: Joe McCann, Esq., Office of Life Sciences

Re: Mystic Holdings, Inc.

Post-Qualification Amendment No. 2 to Offering Statement on Form 1-A

Filed November 6, 2020

File No: 024-11093

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of Mystic Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), we are filing through EDGAR one complete copy of Amendment No. 3 (“Amendment No. 3”) to the captioned Post-Qualification Amendment No. 2 to Offering Statement on Form 1-A (“Amendment No. 2”), including one complete copy of the exhibits listed in Amendment No. 3 as filed therewith.

Amendment No. 3 responds to the comments received from the staff of the SEC in its comment letter dated November 23, 2020, with respect to Amendment No. 2 filed by the Company on November 6, 2020.

Courtesy copies of this letter and Amendment No. 3, together with all exhibits, are being provided directly to the staff for its convenience (attention: Joe McCann, Esq.) in the review of the foregoing documents. To facilitate the staff’s review, the SEC’s comments are reproduced before each of the Company’s responses thereto. All page numbers referred to in this letter correspond to the page numbers of the Amendment.

Post-Qualification Amendment No. 2 to Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed November 6, 2020

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements, page F-1

1. Please revise to include the financial statements of Blum-Desert Inn for the years ended December 31, 2018 and the six months ended June 30, 2019 pursuant to Part F/S of the Form 1-A.

Response: As requested by the staff, Amendment No. 3 has been revised to include the financial statements of Blum-Desert Inn for the years ended December 31, 2018 and the six months ended June 30, 2019.

December 3, 2020

Page 2

Mystic Holdings Financial Statements

Note 3: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition, page F-33

2. It appears that you should have adopted ASC 606 pursuant to ASC 606-10-65-1b. Please revise the policy footnote herein. In addition, you state on page F-64 in the MediFarm I financial statements that you adopted ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018. However the disclosure on page F-33 refers to ASC 605. Please revise accordingly.

Response: The Company adopted ASC 606, pursuant to ASC 606-10-65-1B effective January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, the Company determined the rule had no impact on its financial statements. The Company’s audited financial statements and notes to financial statement have been restated, and its unaudited statements and notes thereto have been revised to reflect the adoption of ASC 606.

In addition, the disclosure on page F-33 has been revised accordingly as per SEC comment (as shown on page F-35 of Amendment No. 3).

Note 20: Subsequent Events, page F-49

3. We note the stock split effected September 10, 2020. Please advise or revise your document to provide the retroactive presentation reflecting the split as applicable as required by ASC 260-10-55-12. For example, it would appear that certain information in the audited December 31, 2019 and unaudited June 30, 2020 balance sheets and statements of equity would need to be revised, as well as the information included in the footnotes for short-term debt, long-term debt and convertible debentures.

Response:

The financial statements have now been revised to provide the retroactive presentation of the split stock, as applicable, as required by ASC 260-10-55-12. The Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been restated to provide the retroactive presentation reflecting the stock split as required by ASC 260-10-55-12. Likewise, the Company’s audited balance sheet and statement of equity for the year ended December 31, 2019, and unaudited balance sheet and statement of equity for the six months ended June 30, 2020, including footnotes for short term debt, long term debt and convertible debentures have been revised accordingly. We evaluated the effect of stock split on short term debt, long term debt and convertible debentures and concluded no changes to such debt obligations were required in response to the stock split.

Pro Forma Financial Information, page F-65

4. We note that several components of the historical information presented in the pro forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement do not reconcile to the audited information provided earlier in your document. For example:

● The first column for Mystic Holdings, Inc., in both the pro forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement, does not reconcile to Mystic’s audited balance sheet and income statement on pages F-4 and F-5, respectively. Please advise, specifically addressing the inclusion of the Investments in Subsidiaries line item in the pro forma balance sheet, or revise accordingly.

Response: As requested, the pro-forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement have been revised accordingly (as shown on pages F-87 and F-88 of Amendment No. 3).

● In the pro forma income statement, Total operating expenses and the Other income line item in the column for MediFarm I LLC does not reconcile to MediFarm I’s audited income statement on page F-53, despite the fact that net income is the same in both locations. Please advise or revise accordingly.

Response: As requested, the pro-forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement have been revised accordingly (as shown on pages F-87 and F-88 of Amendment No. 3).

December 3, 2020

Page 3

5. You state on page F-16 that Blum-Desert Inn was consolidated beginning on November 1, 2019. Please address the following:

● Tell us what the Blum-Desert Inn column on the pro forma balance sheet represents as Blum-Desert Inn should be included in the financial statements of Mystic Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2019. To the extent that you have pro forma adjustments to the balance sheet related to the Blum-Desert Inn acquisition, please clearly footnote the adjustments. For example, it is not clear what the $60,956 adjustment relates.

Response: Initially, the Blum-Desert Inn column was presented separately from the Mystic Holdings, Inc. column on the pro forma balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. The pro forma balance sheet has been revised such that the reflects Blum Desert Inn balance sheet consolidated with the Mystic Holdings, Inc. balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.

● Revise Note 1 - Basis of presentation on page F-67 to clarify that the pro forma balance gives effect to the acquisitions as if they had occurred on December 31, 2019.

Response: The Basis of presentation on page F-67 has been revised such that the pro forma balance gives effect to the acquisitions as if they had occurred on December 31, 2019 (as shown on page F-89 of Amendment No. 3).

● Revise to clarify, if such is the case, that the adjustments on the pro forma Statement of Income reflect the income of Blum-Desert Inn as if the entity had been consolidated as of January 1, 2019. The adjustments should incorporate the income of Blum-Desert for the ten months ended October 31, 2019 as well as any adjustments as a result of business combination accounting.

Response: The pro forma Statement of Income has been revised to reflect the income of Blum Desert Inn as if the entity had been consolidated as of January 1, 2019. The pro forma Statement of Income has been revised to reflect the income of Blum Desert Inn for the ten months ended October 31, 2019.

The Company is anxious to complete this financing transaction this month. The Company respectfully requests the staff to review the remaining comment responses on an accelerated basis so that the qualification of the Post-Qualification Offering Statement may occur on or before Friday, December 11, 2020.

Should any member of the SEC’s staff have any questions concerning the enclosed materials or desire any further information or clarification in respect of the Offering Statement, please do not hesitate to contact Lorenzo Barracco, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, at (646) 286-9070, or me at (212) 451-2234.

Very
truly yours,
/s/
Spencer G. Feldman

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

EMAIL:
SFeldman@olshanlaw.com

DIRECT
DIAL: 212.451.2234

    December
    3, 2020

VIA
EDGAR AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attn.: Joe McCann, Esq., Office of Life Sciences

    Re:
    Mystic
    Holdings, Inc.

    Post-Qualification
    Amendment No. 2 to Offering Statement on Form 1-A

    Filed
    November 6, 2020

    File
    No: 024-11093

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

On
behalf of Mystic Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), we are filing through EDGAR one complete
copy of Amendment No. 3 (“Amendment No. 3”) to the captioned Post-Qualification Amendment No. 2 to Offering
Statement on Form 1-A (“Amendment No. 2”), including one complete copy of the exhibits listed in Amendment
No. 3 as filed therewith.

Amendment
No. 3 responds to the comments received from the staff of the SEC in its comment letter dated November 23, 2020, with respect
to Amendment No. 2 filed by the Company on November 6, 2020.

Courtesy
copies of this letter and Amendment No. 3, together with all exhibits, are being provided directly to the staff for its convenience
(attention: Joe McCann, Esq.) in the review of the foregoing documents. To facilitate the staff’s review, the SEC’s
comments are reproduced before each of the Company’s responses thereto. All page numbers referred to in this letter correspond
to the page numbers of the Amendment.

Post-Qualification
Amendment No. 2 to Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed November 6, 2020

Index
to Consolidated Financial Statements, page F-1

    1.
    Please
    revise to include the financial statements of Blum-Desert Inn for the years ended December 31, 2018 and the six months ended
    June 30, 2019 pursuant to Part F/S of the Form 1-A.

Response:
As requested by the staff, Amendment No. 3 has been revised to include the financial statements of Blum-Desert Inn for the
years ended December 31, 2018 and the six months ended June 30, 2019.

December 3, 2020

Page 2

Mystic
Holdings Financial Statements

Note
3: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue
Recognition, page F-33

    2.
    It
    appears that you should have adopted ASC 606 pursuant to ASC 606-10-65-1b. Please revise the policy footnote herein. In addition,
    you state on page F-64 in the MediFarm I financial statements that you adopted ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018. However
    the disclosure on page F-33 refers to ASC 605. Please revise accordingly.

Response:
The Company adopted ASC 606, pursuant to ASC 606-10-65-1B effective January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, the Company determined
the rule had no impact on its financial statements. The Company’s audited financial statements and notes to financial statement
have been restated, and its unaudited statements and notes thereto have been revised to reflect the adoption of ASC 606.

In
addition, the disclosure on page F-33 has been revised accordingly as per SEC comment (as shown on page F-35 of Amendment No.
3).

Note
20: Subsequent Events, page F-49

    3.
    We
                                                         note the stock split effected September 10, 2020. Please advise or revise your document to provide the retroactive
                                                         presentation reflecting the split as applicable as required by ASC 260-10-55-12. For example, it would appear that certain
                                                         information in the audited December 31, 2019 and unaudited June 30, 2020 balance sheets and statements of equity would need
                                                         to be revised, as well as the information included in the footnotes for short-term debt, long-term debt and convertible
                                                         debentures.

Response:

The
financial statements have now been revised to provide the retroactive presentation of the split stock, as applicable, as required
by ASC 260-10-55-12. The Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been restated
to provide the retroactive presentation reflecting the stock split as required by ASC 260-10-55-12. Likewise, the Company’s
audited balance sheet and statement of equity for the year ended December 31, 2019, and unaudited balance sheet and statement
of equity for the six months ended June 30, 2020, including footnotes for short term debt, long term debt and convertible debentures
have been revised accordingly. We evaluated the effect of stock split on short term debt, long term debt and convertible debentures
and concluded no changes to such debt obligations were required in response to the stock split.

Pro
Forma Financial Information, page F-65

    4.
    We note that several components of the historical
information presented in the pro forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement do not reconcile to the audited information
provided earlier in your document. For example:

    ●
    The first column for Mystic Holdings, Inc., in both
the pro forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement, does not reconcile to Mystic’s audited balance sheet and income
statement on pages F-4 and F-5, respectively. Please advise, specifically addressing the inclusion of the Investments in Subsidiaries
line item in the pro forma balance sheet, or revise accordingly.

Response:
As requested, the pro-forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement have been revised accordingly (as shown on pages
F-87 and F-88 of Amendment No. 3).

    ●
    In
    the pro forma income statement, Total operating expenses and the Other income line item in the column for MediFarm I LLC does
    not reconcile to MediFarm I’s audited income statement on page F-53, despite the fact that net income is the same in
    both locations. Please advise or revise accordingly.

Response:
As requested, the pro-forma balance sheet and pro forma income statement have been revised accordingly (as shown on pages
F-87 and F-88 of Amendment No. 3).

December 3, 2020

Page 3

    5.
    You state on page F-16 that Blum-Desert Inn was consolidated
beginning on November 1, 2019. Please address the following:

    ●
    Tell us what the Blum-Desert Inn column on the pro
forma balance sheet represents as Blum-Desert Inn should be included in the financial statements of Mystic Holdings, Inc. as of
December 31, 2019. To the extent that you have pro forma adjustments to the balance sheet related to the Blum-Desert Inn acquisition,
please clearly footnote the adjustments. For example, it is not clear what the $60,956 adjustment relates.

Response:
Initially, the Blum-Desert Inn column was presented separately from the Mystic Holdings, Inc. column on the pro forma balance
sheet as of December 31, 2019. The pro forma balance sheet has been revised such that the reflects Blum Desert Inn balance sheet
consolidated with the Mystic Holdings, Inc. balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.

    ●
    Revise
    Note 1 - Basis of presentation on page F-67 to clarify that the pro forma balance gives effect to the acquisitions as if they
    had occurred on December 31, 2019.

Response:
The Basis of presentation on page F-67 has been revised such that the pro forma balance gives effect to the acquisitions as
if they had occurred on December 31, 2019 (as shown on page F-89 of Amendment No. 3).

    ●
    Revise
    to clarify, if such is the case, that the adjustments on the pro forma Statement of Income reflect the income of Blum-Desert
    Inn as if the entity had been consolidated as of January 1, 2019. The adjustments should incorporate the income of Blum-Desert
    for the ten months ended October 31, 2019 as well as any adjustments as a result of business combination accounting.

Response:
The pro forma Statement of Income has been revised to reflect the income of Blum Desert Inn as if the entity had been consolidated
as of January 1, 2019. The pro forma Statement of Income has been revised to reflect the income of Blum Desert Inn for the ten
months ended October 31, 2019.

The
Company is anxious to complete this financing transaction this month. The Company respectfully requests the staff to review the
remaining comment responses on an accelerated basis so that the qualification of the Post-Qualification Offering Statement may
occur on or before Friday, December 11, 2020.

Should
any member of the SEC’s staff have any questions concerning the enclosed materials or desire any further information or
clarification in respect of the Offering Statement, please do not hesitate to contact Lorenzo Barracco, the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, at (646) 286-9070, or me at (212) 451-2234.

    Very
    truly yours,

    /s/
    Spencer G. Feldman

    Spencer
    G. Feldman

    cc:

    Joe
    McCann, Esq.

    Ms.
    Mary Mast, Esq.

    Mr.
    Lorenzo Barracco