SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10105

(212) 370-1300

February 7, 2020

David Gessert, Esq.

Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

Office of Finance

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

    Re:
    International General Insurance Holdings Ltd.

    Amendment No. 1 to

    Registration Statement on Form F-4

    Filed January 21, 2020

    File No. 333-2335427

Dear Mr. Gessert:

We are submitting this letter in response to comment 1 of the
staff’s comment letter dated January 29, 2020 with respect to the above-captioned registration statement.

In order to appropriately address the comment, we believe it
would be helpful to first review the structure of the proposed business combination, and then to review the structure against the
applicable staff guidance.

 ● Structure of the Proposed Business Combination

 o The currently reporting public company is Tiberius Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware special purpose acquisition company
(SPAC) (referred to herein as “Tiberius”).

 o The target company is International General Insurance Holdings Ltd., a privately held Dubai company (referred to herein as
“IGI Dubai”).

 o A new holding company has been organized in Bermuda under the name International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (referred
to herein as “IGI Bermuda”).

 o The sole director and sole shareholder of IGI Bermuda is Pervez Rizvi, who is also the Group Chief Financial Officer of IGI
Dubai.

 o In the business combination: (i) Tiberius will merge with a Delaware subsidiary of IGI Bermuda, and the current holders of
Tiberius shares and warrants will receive shares and warrants of IGI Bermuda; and (ii) the security holders of IGI Dubai will exchange
their securities for shares and warrants of IGI Bermuda. Following the business combination, both Tiberius and IGI Dubai will become
wholly owned subsidiaries of IGI Bermuda.

David Gessert, Esq.

Division of Corporation Finance

February 7, 2020

Page 2

 ● Share Ownership Following the Proposed Business Combination

 o Following the business combination, the former shareholders of IGI Dubai will own more than 50% of the outstanding shares of
IGI Bermuda (and the former stockholders of Tiberius will own less than 50% of the outstanding shares of IGI Bermuda). See Annex
A for the detailed calculations.

 o In addition, we advise the staff that a significant number of SPAC shareholders typically elect to redeem their public shares
in connection with a business combination. Taking into account the expected redemptions by a significant number of Tiberius’s
stockholders, we expect that the former stockholders of Tiberius will own substantially less than 50% of the outstanding shares
of IGI Bermuda following the business combination while the former shareholders of IGI Dubai will own between 55% and 71% of the
then-outstanding common shares.

 o In a prior conversation, the staff asked whether the potential exercise of Tiberius’s outstanding warrants should be
considered in evaluating whether the current security holders of Tiberius will own more than 50% of the outstanding shares of IGI
Bermuda following the closing. We do not believe that the shares issuable to the warrant holders should be considered in connection
with control of IGI Bermuda following the closing, for the following reasons:

 ● The warrants are not immediately exercisable at the closing, and will
only become exercisable thirty days following the closing.

 ● The exercise price of the warrants is $11.50 per share. The price
of Tiberius’s common stock is currently closer to $10.60 and it is not likely to increase much more given that the Tiberius
stock price trades based on the dollar amount in the SPAC’s trust account, which is a fixed amount. We would not expect any
holder of Tiberius’s warrants to exercise its out-of-the-money warrants prior to such time that the market price of the shares
of IGI Bermuda exceeds the exercise price of the warrants. There can be no assurance when this would occur, or if it would occur
at all. Furthermore, should Tiberius not close the transaction prior to the expiration date set forth in its charter, Tiberius’s
stockholders will only receive a pro rata portion of the amount in Tiberius’s trust account and Tiberius’s warrants
will expire worthless.

 ● Perhaps most importantly, warrant holders do not typically exercise
warrants unless their warrants are set to expire or are subject to mandatory redemption. Rather, warrant holders generally sell
their warrants in the market to avoid the documentation and timing delays involved in providing a notice of exercise to an issuer
to receive the underlying shares.

David Gessert, Esq.

Division of Corporation Finance

February 7, 2020

Page 3

 o We note that, immediately prior to the closing:

 ● up to 4,275,667 common shares of IGI Bermuda may be issued pursuant
to private placement transactions to be consummated immediately prior to the business combination;

 ● up to 720,588 common shares of IGI Bermuda may be issued pursuant
to an amendment to the underwriting agreement by and between Tiberius and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.; and

 ● up to 2,900,000 common shares of IGI Bermuda may be issued pursuant
to certain forward purchase contracts.

However, because these shares will not be issued until
the closing of the business combination, they should not be included in the number of outstanding Tiberius shares. Not only will
the holders of these shares not be entitled to vote at the special meeting of Tiberius shareholders (as they will not own these
shares at the record date for such meeting), but these shares will immediately be converted into IGI Bermuda shares following issuance.
If these shares are excluded from the calculations set forth in Annex A, then the percentage of IGI Bermuda shares owned
by former IGI shareholders would be even higher (and the percentage of IGI Bermuda shares owned by former Tiberius’s stockholders
will be even lower) than the percentages set forth in Annex A.

 o We also note that the officers of IGI Bermuda, the post-business combination company, will consist solely of personnel from
IGI Dubai, and that five of the seven members of IGI Bermuda’s Board of Directors will be designees of IGI Dubai.

 ● Applicability of CD&I 201.01 and 201.02

We do not believe that either CD&I
201.01 or 201.02 is applicable to the proposed business combination for the following reasons:

 o The bundling issue is applicable where the shareholders of a company
are being requested to vote on the organizational documents of the company, to enable the shareholders to vote on each proposed
material amendment of the company’s organizational documents. In the proposed transaction, however, no vote is being requested
with respect to any organizational documents as no amendment to IGI Bermuda’s memorandum of association and bye-laws is contemplated.
Rather, the parties have heretofore agreed to the form of the memorandum of association and bye-laws for the new entity, which
is set forth in an exhibit to the definitive agreement between the parties.

David Gessert, Esq.

Division of Corporation Finance

February 7, 2020

Page 4

 ● CD&I 201.01 provides (in part):

 o “As a preliminary matter, if a material amendment to the acquiror’s organizational documents would require the
approval of its shareholders under state law, the rules of a national securities exchange, or its organizational documents if presented
on a standalone basis, the acquiror’s form of proxy must present any such amendment separately from any other material proposal,
including, if applicable, approval of the issuance of securities in a triangular merger or approval of the transaction agreement
in a direct merger.”

 § CD&I 201.01 is premised on the notion that a material amendment
to the acquiror’s organizational documents would require the approval of its shareholders under state law. In the proposed
transaction, no amendment of an organizational document is requested or required.

 § In the proposed transaction, the acquiror is IGI Bermuda, which has
only one security holder (Mr. Rizvi). Consequently, the stockholders of Tiberius have no legal authority to vote on IGI Bermuda’s
memorandum of association and bye-laws, insofar as they are not shareholders of IGI Bermuda. The only person who can authorize
any amendment to IGI Bermuda’s organizational documents is Mr. Rizvi, and the organizational documents to be in place at
the time of the business combination have already been approved. Information regarding IGI Bermuda’s memorandum of association
and bye-laws has been included in the Form F-4 solely for disclosure purposes, and not to solicit votes on any amendments.

 ● CD&I 201.02 provides as follows:

 o Question 201.02

Question: Does the answer to Question 201.01 change
if the parties form a new entity to act as an acquisition vehicle that will issue equity securities in the transaction?

Answer: No. In that case, the party whose shareholders
are expected to own the largest percentage of equity securities of the new entity following consummation of the transaction would
be considered the acquiror for purposes of this analysis. As in Question 201.01, the acquiror must present separately on its form
of proxy any material provision or provisions of the new entity’s organizational documents that are a term of the transaction
agreement, if the provision or provisions represent a material change from the acquiror’s organizational documents, and the
change would require the approval of the acquiror’s shareholders under state law, the rules of a national securities exchange,
or its organizational documents if proposed to be made directly to its own organizational documents. Provisions that are required
by law in the jurisdiction of incorporation of the new entity need not be presented separately on the form of proxy. As in Question
201.01, if the acquiror is or would be required under Rule 14a-4(a)(3) to present separately on its form of proxy any provision
of the new entity’s organizational documents that is a term of the transaction agreement, then a target subject to Regulation
14A must also present the same provision separately on its form of proxy.

David Gessert, Esq.

Division of Corporation Finance

February 7, 2020

Page 5

 § As described above, the party whose shareholders will own the largest
percentage of equity securities of the new entity following consummation of the transaction is IGI Dubai, which would be considered
the acquiror pursuant to 201.02.  IGI Dubai has specified the terms of IGI Bermuda’s memorandum of association and bye-laws
in the business combination agreement, and the proxy solicitation to which the Form F-4 pertains does not constitute a solicitation
of shareholders of IGI Dubai.  We believe that the reference to the acquiror in 201.02 makes clear that the stockholders of
Tiberius, which will not be the acquiror for 201.02 purposes, are not within the purview of 201.02.

 § CD&I 201.02 provides that if the acquiror is or would be required
under Rule 14a-4(a)(3) to present separately on its form of proxy any provision of the new entity’s organizational documents
that is a term of the transaction agreement, then a target subject to Regulation 14A must also present the same provision separately
on its form of proxy. We note, though, that because neither IGI Dubai nor any other entity is required to present separately on
its form of proxy any provision of the new entity’s organizational documents, this provision is inapplicable to the transaction.

 o Because no solicitation is being made with respect to the organizational documents of IGI Bermuda, we do not understand how
any unbundling concepts could be applied. Any proposed vote on the organizational documents of IGI Bermuda (whether or not bundled)
would need to explain to shareholders that they are not legally entitled to vote on the organizational documents of IGI Bermuda,
and therefore their vote would have no legal effect. Moreover, with no amendment being proposed, it is unclear what the fallback
position would be (even assuming that the Tiberius stockholders had the legal right to vote). If the stockholders do not approve,
for example, the capital structure set forth in IGI Bermuda’s organizational documents, what capital structure would be implemented
in its place? Unlike a proposed amendment, where a failure to approve an amendment would result in the continuation of the pre-existing
provisions, in this situation there will be no request for an amendment, and therefore no pre-existing provision would apply.

 o We add that we are sensitive to the concept of unbundling, and believe that, to the extent that shareholders are being asked
to approve changes to organizational documents, there is an appropriate basis for requiring shareholders to approve each and every
material change, rather than being required to vote on all changes as a whole. We also understand that, where a new entity is created,
and the shareholders of the public company will control the new entity following a transaction, the requirement for unbundling
cannot be undermined by the fact that there is a new entity. However, in our situation, where Tiberius’s public stockholders
will not control the post-business combination entity, and the consent of Tiberius’s stockholders is not required in connection
with the organizational documents of the successor to be in effect following the business combination (and where Tiberius’s
stockholders do not even have a legal right to vote on or authorize such documents), we believe that the staff’s guidance
with respect to unbundling is not applicable.

David Gessert, Esq.

Division of Corporation Finance

February 7, 2020

Page 6

We hope that the foregoing is helpful to the staff
in its review of this matter.

    Very truly yours,

    /s/ Jeffrey W. Rubin

    Jeffrey W. Rubin

    Cc:
    Mr. Wasef Jabsheh, International General Insurance Holdings Ltd.

    Michael Levitt, Esq., Freshfields

    Stuart Neuhauser, Esq., Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP

David Gessert, Esq.

Division of Corporation Finance

February 7, 2020

Page 7

Annex A

Shareholder Calculations

 § If there are no redemptions, there will be 52,137,783 shares of IGI
Bermuda outstanding following the business combination, of which 54% would be owned by the former IGI Dubai shareholders and 46%
would be owned by the former Tiberius stockholders, calculated as follows:

      28,372,900
      54 %
    Former IGI Dubai Shareholders

      17,250,000
      33 %
    Non-redeeming former public Tiberius stockholders

      2,314,883
      4 %
    Shares issued at closing in a private placement

      2,900,000
      6 %
    Shares issued at closing to certain forward purchasers

      1,300,000
      3 %
    Tiberius sponsor

      52,137,783
      100 %
    Total

 § Assuming maximum redemptions, there will be 39,855,922 shares of IGI
Bermuda outstanding following the business combination, of which 71% would be owned by the former IGI Dubai shareholders and 29%
would be owned by the former Tiberius stockholders, calculated as follows:

      28,372,900
      71 %
    Former IGI Dubai shareholders

      2,852,700
      7 %
    Non-redeeming former public Tiberius shareholders

      2,314,883
      6 %
    Shares issued at closing in a private placement

      2,900,000
      7 %
    Shares issued at closing to certain forward purchasers

      3,260,784
      8 %
    Tiberius sponsor (which would purchase more shares)

      154,654
      1 %
    Shares issued to Tiberius IPO underwriters

      39,855,922
      100 %
    Total

 § The foregoing calculations are based on IGI Dubai’s book value
at June 30, 2019 and assume a $10.45 redemption price for Tiberius’s common stock.