SEC Company Response from BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT, BTCTW) (CIK 0001796514) (BTCT) — Feb 13, 2020
BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT, BTCTW) (CIK 0001796514)
Date: Feb. 13, 2020 · CIK: 0001796514 · Accession: 0001213900-20-003447
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-235859
Referenced dates: February 7, 2020
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
February 12, 2020
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Trade & Services
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: Meten EdtechX Education Group Ltd.
Registration Statement on Form F-4
Filed January 9, 2020
File No. 333-235859
Ladies and Gentlemen:
On behalf of Meten EdtechX Education
Group Ltd. (the “Company”), we hereby respond as follows to the comment letter from the staff of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) dated February 7, 2020, relating to the above-referenced Registration
Statement on Form F-4 (the “Registration Statement”). For the Staff’s convenience, we have recited each
of the comments in the Staff’s letter below in bold and italics, and set forth the Company’s response in regular font
immediately thereafter.
Capitalized terms used but not defined
herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Registration Statement.
Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed
January 9, 2020
Background of the Merger, page 76
1. Please enhance your disclosure to provide a discussion of any alternative transaction(s) considered by EdtechX, other
than the present transaction. For example, provide more detail about your business and financial due diligence concerning the two
targets that you signed letters of intent with, including information regarding the contemplated structure and financial parameters
of these potential business combinations.
We have revised the disclosure on page
76 of the Registration Statement as requested.
February 12, 2020
Page 2
2. Please expand the disclosure to include a more detailed description of the negotiations surrounding the material terms
of the merger agreement and related agreements. In this regard, please discuss how the deal evolved, including the merger consideration,
and how and why there is a two tier stock structure. Overall, your discussion should clearly convey how the parties settled upon
the final terms and structure of the transaction.
We have revised the disclosure on pages
1, 10, 61,77 and 78 of the Registration Statement to provide a more detailed description of the negotiations surrounding the material
terms of the merger agreement and related agreements as requested. We note, however, that the parties have determined not to adopt
a two-tier share structure and this change is reflected in the revisions to the Registration Statement.
EdtechX’s Board of
Director's Reasons for Approval of the Mergers, page 78
3. Please revise your disclosure to identify your “financial advisors” and enhance your description of why the
Board consulted with them and the role they played in helping the Board recommend the transaction to shareholders.
We have revised the disclosure on page
78 of the Registration Statement as requested.
4. Please substantially enhance the disclosure around each of the factors identified in support of the Board’s decision
to recommend the transaction. In this regard, it is not clear what aspect of each of the bullet points listed caused the Board
to recommend the transaction.
We have revised the disclosure on pages
78 and 79 of the Registration Statement as requested.
Certain Forecasted Financial
Information of Meten, page 79
5. Please enhance your disclosure to address whether the projections reflect a significant difference in actual results,
if or when known, as compared to the actual financial performance of Meten for this period.
We have revised the disclosure on page
80 of the Registration Statement as requested.
U.S. Holders
Tax Consequences of the
Merger, page 84
6. We note that you indicate that the merger “should qualify as an integrated exchange for U.S. federal tax purposes
under Section 351” and “a holder of EdtechX stock should not recognize gain or loss upon exchange...” Please
file a tax opinion supporting the material tax consequences to the shareholders as a result of the merger. See Item 601(b)(8) of
Regulation S-K. If there is uncertainty regarding the tax treatment of the merger, counsel’s opinion should discuss the degree
of uncertainty.
February 12, 2020
Page 3
We respectfully advise the Staff that we do not
believe that a tax opinion is required pursuant to Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K, and as such, we believe that no tax
opinion on the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the transaction is required to be filed in connection with
the Registration Statement. We refer to Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19 at Section III.A.1, which states that “Item
601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K requires opinions on tax matters for…other registered offerings where ‘the tax
consequences are material to an investor and a representation as to tax consequences is set forth in the
filing,’” and in Section III.A.2, which states “[e]xamples of transactions generally involving material tax
consequences include…mergers or exchange transactions where the registrant represents that the transaction is tax-free
(e.g., spin-offs, stock for stock mergers).” We respectfully submit to the Staff that the disclosure in the
Registration Statement is not meant to provide representations as to tax consequences of the transaction to any party and in
fact, does not represent that the transaction will be a tax-free transaction. The tax section included in the Registration
Statement is simply meant to provide certain general disclosure related to the possible tax treatment which is all dependent
on a variety of factors, including, but not limited, to the type of investor involved and the holdings of such investor. We
have revised the disclosure in the Registration Statement to make clear that no actual representations are being provided. In
particular, we refer to page 18 of the Registration Statement, which states “There is no guidance directly on point on
how the provisions of Section 351 of the Code apply in the case of a merger of corporations with no active business and only
investment-type assets. Furthermore, there is absence of guidance directly on point as to whether Section 367 of the Code
applies in connection with transactions involving a merger with a non-U.S. corporation, followed by a merger with a U.S.
corporation. Accordingly, due to the absence of such guidance, it is not possible to predict whether the IRS or a court
considering the issue would take or sustain a position indicating the transaction qualifies as a tax free transaction under
either section[,]” and page 84, which states “EACH HOLDER OF EDTECHX SECURITIES AND HOLDCO SECURITIES IS URGED TO
CONSULT WITH ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO SUCH HOLDER OF THE MERGERS[.]”
Furthermore, EdtechX has advised us that they believe the tax consequences of the transaction to its stockholders are not
substantially material to such holder’s investment decision (as opposed to the materiality of tax consequences to a
holder of a typical operating company) due to the fact that if an EdtechX stockholder has concerns with respect to the
potential tax consequences to him of the transaction, such holder may exercise his right to seek conversion of his shares to
cash from the EdtechX trust account and not become a company shareholder. Since no representation as to the tax treatment of
the transaction is being given and the tax consequences in this transaction are not material to an investment decision of an
EdtechX stockholder, we respectfully believe that an opinion is not required to be provided pursuant to Item 601(b)(8) of
Regulation S-K.
February 12, 2020
Page 4
Meten Executive Officer
and Director Compensation
Summary Compensation Table,
page 108
7. We note officers of Meten received bonuses. Please provide a brief description of the bonus plan and the basis upon which
such persons participate in the bonus plan. Please see Item 6.B. of Form 20-F
We have revised the disclosure on page
108 of the Registration Statement as requested.
Our Corporate and Shareholding
Structure, page 149
8. Due to the size of your print, your chart is difficult to read. While retaining your disclosure, please provide it in
a more readable format. See Rule 420 of Regulation C.
We have sharpened the image of the chart
on page 150 of the Registration Statement as requested.
Beneficial Ownership of
Securities, page 205
9. Please identify the natural persons with voting and/or dispositive power over the securities held by the non-natural
persons listed in your ownership table.
We have revised the disclosure on pages
205 and 206 of the Registration Statement as requested.
*************
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me at the above telephone and facsimile numbers.
Sincerely,
By:
/s/ Ning Zhang
Ning ZHANG
Partner
cc.
Mr. Siguang Peng, Chief Executive Officer, Meten International Education
Group
Mr. Yupeng Guo, Vice President, Meten International
Education Group
Mr. Ng Kwok Yin, Chief Financial Officer, Meten
International Education Group
Mr. Benjamin Vedrenne-Cloquet, Chief
Executive Officer of EdtechX Holdings Acquisition Corp.
Mr. Yile Gao, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
LLP
Mr. Jeffrey M. Gallant, Graubard Miller