SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics Monthly Activity About

SEC Company Response from Tax Free Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. (CIK 0001847518) — Apr 7, 2022

Tax Free Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. (CIK 0001847518)
Date: April 7, 2022 · CIK: 0001847518 · Accession: 0001387131-22-004643

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 811-23672

Date
April 7, 2022
Author
/s/ Kai Haakon E. Liekefett
Form
CORRESP
Company
Tax Free Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. (CIK 0001847518)

Letter

Division of Investment Management United States Securities and Exchange Commission F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549-3561 Re: Tax Free Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc., File No. 811-23672

Dear Ms. Dubey:

On behalf of our client, Tax Free Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. (the “Fund”), set forth below are responses to oral comments received over the telephone from the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on April 6, 2022 with respect to the preliminary proxy statement filed on March 28, 2022 by the Fund with the Commission under cover of Schedule 14A as form type PREC14A (the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”).

For your convenience, each response is prefaced by a paraphrasing of the Staff’s corresponding comment in bold, italicized text.

1. The Preliminary Proxy Statement states that “[i]n the event a quorum is present at the Meeting but sufficient votes to approve any of the proposed items are not received, the presiding officer of the Meeting may decide to adjourn the Meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. Additionally, the presiding officer of the Meeting may decide to adjourn the Meeting whenever the requisite quorum has not been obtained to permit further solicitation of proxies.” Please describe the basis for the presiding officer’s authority to adjourn the meeting.

Response: The Fund respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The presiding person of the Fund’s shareholder meeting has the non-exclusive authority to adjourn such meeting in either event set forth in the above statements under the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Fund (the “By-Laws”).

Pursuant to Article II, Section 5 of the By-Laws, the presiding person at a shareholder meeting may make any “determinations that may be appropriate to the conduct of the meeting.” It is generally understood that adjournment falls within the “conduct of the meeting.” See, e.g., The American Bar Association, Handbook for the Conduct of Shareholders’ Meetings § 12 (3d ed. 2021) (addressing adjournments). The Fund is incorporated in Puerto Rico, whose courts generally look to Delaware jurisprudence in interpreting Puerto Rico’s corporate law. See Llorens v. Arribas, 184 D.P.R. 32, 49–50 (2011). Delaware courts have consistently ruled that the presiding officer of a meeting has the power to adjourn the meeting in a variety of circumstances.1 No provision of the Fund’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, or the By-Laws purports to limit the authority of the presiding person nor give exclusive authority to shareholders to adjourn meetings.2

______________________________

See Portnoy v. Cryo-Cell Int’l Inc., 940 A.2d 43, 77 (Del. Ch. 2008) (“In my view, [plaintiff] is not positioned to contest [the presiding individual’s] authority to ‘decide all procedural issues regarding the conduct of the meeting, including adjournment,’ so long as she did so in good faith.”); State of Wisconsin Inv. Bd. V. Peerless Sys. Corp., C.A. No. 17637 (Del. Ch. Dec. 4, 2000), reargument denied, C.A. No. 17637 (Del. Ch. Jan. 5, 2001).

Article II, Section 8 of the By-Laws provides only permissive – but not exclusive – authority to shareholders to adjourn meetings: “If less than said number of the outstanding shares are represented at a meeting, a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn the meeting from time to time without further notice.”

TFF I SEC RESPONSE LTR 000001

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Investment Management

April 7, 2022

Page 2

Further, in the recently decided Ocean Capital, LLC v. Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. et al., a certified translation of which is attached as Exhibit A, the Puerto Rico court did not dispute that the meetings of Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc., Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund III for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc., and Puerto Rico Residents Tax-Free Fund VI, Inc. were validly adjourned by the presiding officer in connection with other proxy contests involving Ocean Capital LLC.3

2. The Preliminary Proxy Statement states that “[a]s a result, any Shares not voted FOR a particular nominee, whether as a result of a withhold vote, a broker non-vote or an abstention (in each case, as defined below), will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.” Please clarify whether this statement applies to both of the scenarios discussed in the preceding sentences.

Response: The Fund respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will revise the above statement as follows:

As a result, in each case, any Shares not voted FOR a particular nominee, whether as a result of a withhold vote, a broker non-vote or an abstention (in each case, as defined below), will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

* * * * *

______________________________

Ocean Capital, LLC v. Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. at p. 17 (“In fact, it appears from the stipulated documents that each meeting was validly adjourned for the articulated purpose of providing the Funds and Ocean Capital with additional time (so that they could seek shareholder proxies to establish a quorum on the next scheduled meeting date).”).

TFF I SEC RESPONSE LTR 000002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Investment Management

April 7, 2022

Page 3

Please direct any questions that you may have with respect to the foregoing or any requests for supplemental information by the Staff to Kai Haakon E. Liekefett at (212) 839-8744.

Very
truly yours,
/s/ Kai Haakon E. Liekefett

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

  Sidley
                                            Austin LLP

787 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10019

+1 212 839 5300

+1 212 839 5599 Fax

AMERICA ● ASIA PACIFIC ● EUROPE

  +1 212 839 8744

kliekefett@sidley.com

EDGAR and Email

April 7, 2022

Anu
Dubey, Senior Counsel

Division
of Investment Management

United
States Securities and Exchange Commission

100
F Street, N.E.

Washington,
D.C. 20549-3561

 Re: Tax
                                            Free Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc., File No. 811-23672

Dear
Ms. Dubey:

On
behalf of our client, Tax Free Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. (the “Fund”), set forth below are responses
to oral comments received over the telephone from the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the “Staff”)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on April 6, 2022 with respect to the preliminary
proxy statement filed on March 28, 2022 by the Fund with the Commission under cover of Schedule 14A as form type PREC14A (the “Preliminary
Proxy Statement”).

For
your convenience, each response is prefaced by a paraphrasing of the Staff’s corresponding comment in bold, italicized text.

 1. The
                                            Preliminary Proxy Statement states that “[i]n the event a quorum is present at the
                                            Meeting but sufficient votes to approve any of the proposed items are not received, the presiding
                                            officer of the Meeting may decide to adjourn the Meeting to permit further solicitation of
                                            proxies. Additionally, the presiding officer of the Meeting may decide to adjourn the Meeting
                                            whenever the requisite quorum has not been obtained to permit further solicitation of proxies.”
                                            Please describe the basis for the presiding officer’s authority to adjourn the meeting.

Response:
The Fund respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The presiding person of the Fund’s shareholder meeting has the
non-exclusive authority to adjourn such meeting in either event set forth in the above statements under the Amended and Restated
By-Laws of the Fund (the “By-Laws”).

Pursuant
to Article II, Section 5 of the By-Laws, the presiding person at a shareholder meeting may make any “determinations
that may be appropriate to the conduct of the meeting.” It is generally understood that adjournment falls within the “conduct
of the meeting.” See, e.g., The American Bar Association, Handbook for the Conduct of Shareholders’ Meetings §
12 (3d ed. 2021) (addressing adjournments). The Fund is incorporated in Puerto Rico, whose courts generally look to Delaware jurisprudence
in interpreting Puerto Rico’s corporate law. See Llorens v. Arribas, 184 D.P.R. 32, 49–50 (2011). Delaware courts
have consistently ruled that the presiding officer of a meeting has the power to adjourn the meeting in a variety of circumstances.1
No provision of the Fund’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, or the By-Laws purports to limit the authority of the
presiding person nor give exclusive authority to shareholders to adjourn meetings.2

______________________________

1
See Portnoy v. Cryo-Cell Int’l Inc., 940 A.2d 43, 77 (Del. Ch. 2008) (“In my view, [plaintiff] is not positioned
to contest [the presiding individual’s] authority to ‘decide all procedural issues regarding the conduct of the meeting,
including adjournment,’ so long as she did so in good faith.”); State of Wisconsin Inv. Bd. V. Peerless Sys. Corp.,
C.A. No. 17637 (Del. Ch. Dec. 4, 2000), reargument denied, C.A. No. 17637 (Del. Ch. Jan. 5, 2001).

2
Article II, Section 8 of the By-Laws provides only permissive – but not exclusive – authority to shareholders
to adjourn meetings: “If less than said number of the outstanding shares are represented at a meeting, a majority of the shares
so represented may adjourn the meeting from time to time without further notice.”

      TFF I SEC RESPONSE LTR 000001

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Investment Management

April 7, 2022

Page 2

Further,
in the recently decided Ocean Capital, LLC v. Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. et al., a certified translation
of which is attached as Exhibit A, the Puerto Rico court did not dispute that the meetings of Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund for Puerto
Rico Residents, Inc., Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund III for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc., and Puerto Rico Residents Tax-Free Fund VI, Inc.
were validly adjourned by the presiding officer in connection with other proxy contests involving Ocean Capital LLC.3

 2. The
                                            Preliminary Proxy Statement states that “[a]s a result, any Shares not voted FOR a
                                            particular nominee, whether as a result of a withhold vote, a broker non-vote or an abstention
                                            (in each case, as defined below), will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will
                                            have no effect on the outcome of the election.” Please clarify whether this statement
                                            applies to both of the scenarios discussed in the preceding sentences.

Response:
The Fund respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will revise the above statement as follows:

As
a result, in each case, any Shares not voted FOR a particular nominee, whether as a result of a withhold vote, a broker
non-vote or an abstention (in each case, as defined below), will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect
on the outcome of the election.

*      *      *      *      *

______________________________

3
Ocean Capital, LLC v. Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. at p. 17 (“In fact, it appears from
the stipulated documents that each meeting was validly adjourned for the articulated purpose of providing the Funds and Ocean Capital
with additional time (so that they could seek shareholder proxies to establish a quorum on the next scheduled meeting date).”).

      TFF I SEC RESPONSE LTR 000002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Investment Management

April 7, 2022

Page 3

Please
direct any questions that you may have with respect to the foregoing or any requests for supplemental information by the Staff to Kai
Haakon E. Liekefett at (212) 839-8744.

  Very
truly yours,

  /s/ Kai Haakon E. Liekefett

  Kai Haakon E. Liekefett

  cc:
  Alexandre-C. Manz, General Counsel

  José
C. Sánchez-Castro, Member, Sánchez/LRV Law Firm

      TFF I SEC RESPONSE LTR 000003

Exhibit
A

Ocean
Capital, LLC v. Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc. et al.

[See
attached]

      TFF I SEC RESPONSE LTR 000004