SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0001213900-24-000612 from Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO, KLTOW) (CIK 0001907223) (KLTO)

Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO, KLTOW) (CIK 0001907223)
Date: Jan. 3, 2024 · CIK: 0001907223 · Accession: 0001213900-24-000612

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-273748

Referenced dates: December 15, 2023

Date
January 3, 2024
Author
/s/ Giovanni Caruso
Form
CORRESP
Company
Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO, KLTOW) (CIK 0001907223)

Letter

Via Edgar Attention: Tim Buchmiller Redwoods Acquisition Corp. Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 Filed December 4, 2023 File No. 333-273748

Dear Mr. Buchmiller:

On behalf of our client, Redwoods Acquisition Corp. (“Redwoods” or the “Company”), we hereby provide a response to the comments issued in a letter dated December 15, 2023 (the “Staff’s Letter”) regarding the Company’s Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 that was filed by the Company on December 4, 2023 (the “Amended Registration Statement No. 3”). Concurrently with the submission of this letter, the Company is filing an amendment to the Amended Registration Statement No.3 on Form S-4 (the “Amended Registration Statement No.4”) via EDGAR for review in accordance with the procedures of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In order to facilitate the review by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) of the Amended Registration Statement No.4, we have responded, on behalf of the Company, to the comments set forth in the Staff’s Letter on a point-by-point basis. The numbered paragraphs set forth below respond to the Staff’s comments and correspond to the numbered paragraph in the Staff’s Letter.

Los Angeles New York Chicago Nashville Washington, DC Beijing Hong Kong www.loeb.com

A limited liability partnership including professional corporations

Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-4

Cover Page

1. Please revise your cover page to prominently disclose the title and amount of securities offered. Refer to Item 501(b)(2) or Regulation S-K.

Response: The Company has revised the disclosure on the cover page in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

Following the business combination, what will be the Combined Company’s liquidity position?,

page vii

2. We note your disclosure in the answer to this FAQ is expressed in the amount of dollars you will have on your balance sheet. Please balance this disclosure, and the similar disclosure elsewhere, with the related amount of working capital (or deficit) you will have under the various scenarios.

Response: The Company has revised the disclosure on pages vii, viii, 9, 158 and 172 in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Business Combination, page 11

3. We note your revised disclosure on page 150 that your CFO, Edward Cong Wang, will serve as a director of the Combined Company. Please revise this section and related sections to specify this potential conflict of interest.

Response: The Company has revised the disclosure on pages 13 and 84 in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

Background of Redwoods’ and ANEW’s Financial Advisors, page 75

4. We note your disclosure on page 76 that Del Mar Global Advisors Limited presented itself to you as a financial advisor on August 3, 2023 and that you executed a Consultant Agreement with Del Mar on November 29, 2023. Please specify whether Del Mar is serving as a financial advisor and whether this role differs from the role articulated in the Consultant Agreement.

Response: The Company has revised the disclosure on page 76 in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

Redwoods’ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern, page 122

5. We note your discussion of working capital deficit here and in Note 1 to your unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements on page F-10 that is not the result of current assets less current liabilities. Please revise your presentation and disclosures to clearly identify, label, and discuss this non-GAAP measure in full compliance with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, or tell us why such disclosure is not required.

Response: The Company has revised the discussion of working capital deficit in the Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern sections on page 122 and page F-10.

Information about ANEW, page 127

6. We note from your revised disclosure in response to prior comment 3 that ANEW will no longer be focused on developing an in vitro diagnostic for Klotho isoforms. Please revise to clarify how ANEW intends to develop a gene therapy candidate, and select participants for clinical trials, if a diagnostic is not simultaneously developed. If ANEW will be relying on a third-party diagnostic, please make that clear and include appropriate risk factor disclosure. Also, please disclose if not pursuing the diagnostic would give Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) a basis to terminate the agreement between UAB and ANEW and include appropriate risk factor disclosure. We also note the disclosure under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” on page 171 that ANEW continues to expect to deploy $1.25 million of capital for an in vitro diagnostic of Klotho isoforms. Please revise that disclosure as appropriate.

Response: The Company has revised the disclosure on pages 29, 130 and 171 in accordance with the Staff’s comments.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information, page

7. Please address the following regarding your response to prior comment four:

● We note your revisions on pages 164 and 165. You disclose on page 158 that there is no minimum cash condition for completing the offering. You also disclose on page ix that the receipt of PIPE financing is not a closing condition for completing the merger. However, you disclose on pages 4 and 65 that “Five million dollars ($5,000,000) is the minimum required cash commitment to complete the merger.” Please revise your disclosures to reconcile this apparent inconsistency.

● To the extent additional financing is required for completion of the merger, revise the introductory narrative to your pro formas to identify the nature of the financing alternatives you are actively considering.

● Disclose the extent to which you believe it is probable that the merger will close if, in the absence of additional PIPE financing, under the 50% scenario or maximum redemption scenario, redemptions will result in less than the minimum required cash of $5 million.

Response: The Company has revised the disclose on pages 4 and 65 to reflect that there is no minimum cash condition for closing under the Merger Agreement. No additional financing is required for the completion of the merger and therefore the absence of additional PIPE financing will not impact the Closing.

Note 3 - Transaction Accounting Adjustments

cc - Merger and acquisitions and other fees, page 168

8. We note your explanation that your pro forma adjustment (cc), in the amount of $3,985,000 is for merger and acquisitions fees, proxy solicitor fees, market maker fees, legal fees, PIPE financings fees, PCAOB auditor fees and other fees. This amount, added to the $4,312,500 deferred underwriting fee payable amounts to $8,297,500, and represents fees due at closing. We also note that the fees payable at closing decreased from $11,697,500 disclosed in your previous amendment; please tell us the reason for the decrease, provide a breakdown of the items excluded, and adjust your disclosures as necessary to clarify.

Response: The Company has revised the disclosure on pages viii, 9, 158, 164, 166, 168 and 172 in accordance with the Staff’s comment. The total transaction fees were disclosed as $11,697,500 in Amended Registration Statement No. 2 and were disclosed as $8,297,500 in Amended Registration Statement No. 3. The $3,400,000 decrease in transaction fees resulted from Chardan cancelling $3,600,000 of its M&A advisory fees, offset by a $200,000 increase in Redwoods legal fees.

General

9. Please provide us with the 2022 M&A Engagement Letter between Redwoods and Chardan described on page 70.

Response: The Company has supplementally provided the 2022 M&A Engagement Letter between Redwoods and Chardan to the Staff.

Please call me at 212 407-4866 if you would like additional information with respect to any of the foregoing.

Sincerely,
/s/ Giovanni Caruso

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    GIOVANNI
    CARUSO

    Partner

    345 Park Avenue

    New York, NY 10154

    Direct

    Main

    Fax

    212.407.4866

    212.407.4000

    212.407.4990

    gcaruso@loeb.com

Via Edgar

January 3, 2024

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

    Attention:
    Tim Buchmiller

    Dillon Hagius

    Ibolya Ignat

    Kevin Vaughn

    Re:

    Redwoods Acquisition Corp.

    Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on
    Form S-4

    Filed December 4, 2023

    File No. 333-273748

Dear Mr. Buchmiller:

On behalf of our client, Redwoods
Acquisition Corp. (“Redwoods” or the “Company”), we hereby provide a response to the comments issued
in a letter dated December 15, 2023 (the “Staff’s Letter”) regarding the Company’s Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 that was filed by the Company on December 4, 2023 (the “Amended Registration Statement No.
3”). Concurrently with the submission of this letter, the Company is filing an amendment to the Amended Registration Statement
No.3 on Form S-4 (the “Amended Registration Statement No.4”) via EDGAR for review in accordance with the procedures
of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In order to facilitate the
review by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) of the Amended Registration Statement No.4,
we have responded, on behalf of the Company, to the comments set forth in the Staff’s Letter on a point-by-point basis. The numbered
paragraphs set forth below respond to the Staff’s comments and correspond to the numbered paragraph in the Staff’s Letter.

Los Angeles     New York      Chicago      Nashville     Washington,
DC      Beijing     Hong Kong     www.loeb.com

A limited liability partnership including professional
corporations

Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on
Form S-4

Cover Page

 1. Please
revise your cover page to prominently disclose the title and amount of securities offered. Refer to Item 501(b)(2) or Regulation
S-K.

Response: The Company has revised
the disclosure on the cover page in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

Following the business combination, what will
be the Combined Company’s liquidity position?,

page vii

 2. We
note your disclosure in the answer to this FAQ is expressed in the amount of dollars you will have on your balance sheet. Please balance
this disclosure, and the similar disclosure elsewhere, with the related amount of working capital (or deficit) you will have under the
various scenarios.

Response: The Company has revised the disclosure on pages vii, viii, 9, 158 and 172 in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Business
Combination, page 11

 3. We
note your revised disclosure on page 150 that your CFO, Edward Cong Wang, will serve as a director of the Combined Company. Please
revise this section and related sections to specify this potential conflict of interest.

Response: The Company has revised
the disclosure on pages 13 and 84 in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

Background of Redwoods’ and ANEW’s Financial
Advisors, page 75

 4. We note your disclosure on page 76 that Del Mar Global Advisors
Limited presented itself to you as a financial advisor on August 3, 2023 and that you executed a Consultant Agreement with
Del Mar on November 29, 2023. Please specify whether Del Mar is serving as a financial advisor and whether this role differs
from the role articulated in the Consultant Agreement.

Response: The Company has revised
the disclosure on page 76 in accordance with the Staff’s comment.

    2

Redwoods’ Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern,
page 122

 5. We note your discussion of working capital deficit here and
in Note 1 to your unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements on page F-10 that is not the result of current assets less current
liabilities. Please revise your presentation and disclosures to clearly identify, label, and discuss this non-GAAP measure in full compliance
with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, or tell us why such disclosure is not required.

Response: The Company has revised
the discussion of working capital deficit in the Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern sections on page 122 and page F-10.

Information about ANEW, page 127

 6. We note from your revised disclosure in response to prior comment 3 that ANEW will no longer be
                                                                                                                                                                   focused on developing an in vitro diagnostic for Klotho isoforms. Please revise to clarify how ANEW intends to develop a gene
                                                                                                                                                                   therapy candidate, and select participants for clinical trials, if a diagnostic is not simultaneously developed. If ANEW will be
                                                                                                                                                                   relying on a third-party diagnostic, please make that clear and include appropriate risk factor disclosure. Also, please
                                                                                                                                                                   disclose if not pursuing the diagnostic would give Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) a basis to terminate the agreement
                                                                                                                                                                   between UAB and ANEW and include appropriate risk factor disclosure. We also note the disclosure under “Liquidity and
                                                                                                                                                                   Capital Resources” on page 171 that ANEW continues to expect to deploy $1.25 million of capital for an in vitro
                                                                                                                                                                   diagnostic of Klotho isoforms. Please revise that disclosure as appropriate.

Response: The Company has
revised the disclosure on pages 29, 130 and 171 in accordance with the Staff’s comments.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information, page
156

 7. Please
                                            address the following regarding
                                            your response to prior comment four:

 ● We
                                            note your revisions on pages 164 and 165. You disclose on page 158 that there is no
                                            minimum cash condition for completing the offering. You also disclose on page ix that
                                            the receipt of PIPE financing is not a closing condition for completing the merger. However,
                                            you disclose on pages 4 and 65 that “Five million dollars ($5,000,000) is the minimum
                                            required cash commitment to complete the merger.” Please revise your disclosures
                                            to reconcile this apparent inconsistency.

 ● To
                                            the extent additional financing is required for completion of the merger, revise the introductory
                                            narrative to your pro formas to identify the nature of the financing alternatives you are
                                            actively considering.

 ● Disclose
                                            the extent to which you believe it is probable that the merger will close if, in the absence
                                            of additional PIPE financing, under the 50% scenario or maximum redemption scenario, redemptions
                                            will result in less than the minimum required cash of $5 million.

Response:
The Company has revised the disclose on pages 4 and 65 to reflect that
there is no minimum cash condition for closing under the Merger Agreement. No additional financing is required for the completion of the
merger and therefore the absence of additional PIPE financing will not impact the Closing.

    3

Note 3 - Transaction Accounting Adjustments

cc - Merger and acquisitions and other fees,
page 168

 8. We note your explanation that your pro forma adjustment
(cc), in the amount of $3,985,000 is for merger and acquisitions fees, proxy solicitor fees, market maker fees, legal fees,
PIPE financings fees, PCAOB auditor fees and other fees. This amount, added to the $4,312,500 deferred underwriting fee payable
amounts to $8,297,500, and represents fees due at closing. We also note that the fees payable at closing decreased from $11,697,500
disclosed in your previous amendment; please tell us the reason for the decrease, provide a breakdown of the items excluded, and adjust
your disclosures as necessary to clarify.

Response: The Company has
revised the disclosure on pages viii, 9, 158, 164, 166, 168 and 172 in accordance with the Staff’s comment. The total
transaction fees were disclosed as $11,697,500 in Amended Registration Statement No. 2 and were disclosed as $8,297,500 in Amended
Registration Statement No. 3. The $3,400,000 decrease in transaction fees resulted from Chardan cancelling $3,600,000 of its M&A
advisory fees, offset by a $200,000 increase in Redwoods legal fees.

General

 9. Please provide us with the 2022 M&A Engagement Letter
between Redwoods and Chardan described on page 70.

Response: The Company has supplementally
provided the 2022 M&A Engagement Letter between Redwoods and Chardan to the Staff.

Please call me at 212 407-4866 if you
would like additional information with respect to any of the foregoing.

    Sincerely,

    /s/ Giovanni Caruso

    Giovanni Caruso

    Partner

    4