Correspondence 0001387131-23-004535 from WM Argyle Fund, LLC (CIK 0001924978)
WM Argyle Fund, LLC (CIK 0001924978)
Date: April 6, 2023 · CIK: 0001924978 · Accession: 0001387131-23-004535
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-34278
Referenced dates: March 31, 2023, March 31, 2023
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
P.O. Box 2965
Milwaukee, WI 53201-2965
1000 North Water Street
Suite 1700
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Telephone: 414-298-1000
Facsimile: 414-298-8097
reinhartlaw.com
April 6, 2023
SENT VIA EDGAR
Mr. David Plattner
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Dear Mr. Plattner:
Re:
Response to SEC Staff Comment
Letter dated March 31, 2023
BROADWIND, INC.
PREC14A filed by WM Argyle Fund, LLC et al.
Filed March 21, 2023; File No. 001-34278
This letter responds to the letter dated March 31,
2023 (the “Comment Letter”), regarding the above referenced filing (as amended from time to time, the “Form PREC14A”).
A revised preliminary proxy statement (the “Revised Proxy Statement”) is being filed electronically on EDGAR today by WM Argyle
Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) and the other participants specified therein (collectively, the “Participants”).
Set forth below is the response of the Participants
to the comments of the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Commission”) contained in the Comment Letter. For your convenience, the Staff’s comments have been reproduced below
in bold-face font. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this response letter have the meanings ascribed to them in the Revised Proxy
Statement.
Milwaukee • Madison • Waukesha •
Chicago, IL
Rockford, IL • Minneapolis, MN • Denver,
CO • Phoenix, AZ
Mr. David Plattner
April 6, 2023
Page 2
PREC14A filed March 21, 2023
General
Comment 1: Please outline briefly the rights of appraisal
or similar rights of dissenters with respect to any matter to be acted upon at the meeting and describe any statutory procedure required
to be followed by dissenting security holders in order to perfect such rights. See Item 3 of Schedule 14A.
Response: The Revised Proxy Statement discloses
that appraisal rights do not apply to any proposal to be acted upon at the meeting.
Comment 2: Please change all references to the Company’s
“blue” proxy card to “white.”
Response: In the Revised Proxy Statement,
all references to the Company’s “blue” proxy card have been changed to “white”.
Comment 3. Please update the proxy statement and the proxy
card to reflect the additional director nominee and additional proposals presented in the Company’s proxy statement. Please also ensure
that any disclosure in your proxy statement or proxy card that tracks the Company’s disclosure is similarly updated to reflect the latest
disclosure.
Response: The Revised Proxy Statement
reflects the additional director nominees and additional proposals presented in the Company’s preliminary proxy statement
filed on March 27, 2023 (as revised to date, the “Company Proxy Statement”). To the extent the Company files revised or definitive
proxy materials with updated disclosure on such matters, the disclosure in the Participants’ proxy statement will be similarly
updated.
Comment 4: We note the following disclosure on page 4:
“IF YOU VOTE “FOR” MORE THAN SIX NOMINEES, YOUR SHARES WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL THREE OF THE NOMINEES AND FOR
THE THREE ACCEPTABLE COMPANY NOMINEES.” Please provide a detailed legal analysis supporting the validity of this approach both under
the federal proxy rules, in particular Rule 14a-4(e), and under applicable state law. Alternatively, please amend the disclosure here
(and similar disclosure elsewhere, including on the proxy card) to provide that an overvote on Proposal 1 will result in the votes on
that proposal being invalid and not counted.
Response: The Revised Proxy Statement
includes disclosure that overvotes on Proposal 1 will be invalid and will not be counted. We note that the Company Proxy
Statement contains similar disclosure and the Fund intends to take a position consistent with that of the Company on the treatment
of overvotes on Proposal 1.
Mr. David Plattner
April 6, 2023
Page 3
Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and the Annual
Meeting, page 15
Comment 5: On page 17, we note the reference to the
Company’s proxy statement as an “opposition” proxy statement. To avoid confusing shareholders, please do not refer to the Company’s
proxy statement in such manner.
Response: The reference to “opposition”
proxy statement has been deleted in the Revised Proxy Statement.
Comment 6: We note the disclosure on page 18 that
states that proxies may be solicited by, among other means, telegraph. Please advise us as to whether the reference to telegraph is accurate,
or delete it.
Response: The reference to telegraph has
been deleted in the Revised Proxy Statement.
Other Information About the Company, page 21
Comment 7: We note the reference to the Company’s proxy
statement being available on the SEC website. Please ensure that such disclosure tracks the requirements of Item 7(f) of Schedule 14A,
including by making a reference to the fact that information can be accessed without cost.
Response: The Revised Proxy Statement includes
a reference to the fact that the Company Proxy Statement is available on the SEC website and can be accessed without cost.
Thank you for your consideration of our responses
to the Comment Letter and please do not hesitate to contact me at (414) 298-8453 with any questions or comments regarding any of the foregoing.
Yours very truly,
/s/ John K. Tokarz
John K. Tokarz
cc Ms. Christina
Chalk