Correspondence 0001104659-23-001935 from Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit & Income Fund (CIK 0001937073)
Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit & Income Fund (CIK 0001937073)
Date: Jan. 6, 2023 · CIK: 0001937073 · Accession: 0001104659-23-001935
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-266053, 811-23815
Letter
Division of Investment Management – Disclosure Review and Accounting Office 100 F Street NE Washington, D.C. 20549-0504 Re: Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund File Nos: 333-266053, 811-23815
Dear Ms. Larkin:
We are writing in response to comments provided on September 16, 2022 with respect to the registration statement on Form N-2 (the “Registration Statement”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) filed on August 22, 2022 on behalf of Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund (the “Fund”), a closed-end management investment company. The Fund has considered your comments and has authorized us, on its behalf, to make the responses and changes discussed below to the Registration Statement. Capitalized terms have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Registration Statements.
Concurrently with this letter, the Fund is filing Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement, which reflects the disclosure changes discussed below.
On behalf of the Fund, set forth below are the SEC staff’s comments along with our responses to or any supplemental explanations of such comments, as requested.
Facing Sheet
Comment 1. On the facing sheet, please uncheck the box “when declared effective pursuant to 8(c) of the Securities Act.”
Response 1. The disclosure has been revised accordingly.
Cover Page (ii)
Comment 2. On cover page (ii), the definition of “credit-related instruments” is too broad given that the fund name contains “alternative credit.” “Alternative credit” suggests a subset of debt securities. “Originated hybrid securities” seems too broad and “preferred equity securities” does not seem like it belongs in the 80% bucket. While funds and companies that primarily hold loans or credit-like instruments can be included, (1) it must be clear that only the underlying debt securities of such a company would count towards the 80% test; and (2) credit-like instruments are acceptable, but they must be actual credit or debt securities.
– 1 –
Response 2. The Fund name has been revised to Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund. Given the Fund’s name change, the definition of “credit-related instruments” in the Fund’s 80% policy has been revised to “credit and income related instruments”. “Originated hybrid securities” and “preferred equity securities” have been redefined as “income producing preferred equity securities”.
Comment 3. On cover page (ii), prong (g) (“other investments that, as deemed by the Fund, feature significant loan-related characteristics (including, but not limited to, warehouse and backstop facilities, asset-backed securities, leases, royalties, funding agreements, litigation and other claims, insurance-related assets, equity ownership in private specialty finance companies, etc.)”) is too broad and does not appear to constitute “credit.” If any of these investments are not important to the fund strategy, please consider removing them. If the investments are important, consider changing the fund name in light of Rule 35d-1. For example, a “royalty” does not seem like a credit instrument.
Response 3. The Fund name has been revised to Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund. Given the Fund’s name change, the disclosure has been revised to reflect that the Fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in credit and income related instruments. Please see the descriptions of the investments below, which clarify how each investment is a “credit and income related” investment.
· Warehouse facilities act as a bridge for the transfer of loans from one entity to another, or to a refinancing by more traditional, longer-term forms of bank financing. The warehouse provider is generally compensated through the interest earned on the underlying loans during the hold period, as well as a number of additional fees structured into the warehousing agreement. We view these facilities as income-generating because their returns are driven by contractual interest and fees of the underlying private credit instruments.
· Backstop facilities are utilized by banks, commercial finance companies, or other institutions that are syndicating loans in order to provide committed capital for those loans in case they are unable to find a buyer for such loans or source third-party capital. We view these facilities as income-generating because they generate ongoing fees and, if the backstops are utilized, provide for the payment of contractual interest over time based on the underlying loans or credit instruments.
– 2 –
· Asset-backed securities are investments collateralized by underlying pools of loans or assets that are income-generating because they provide the holders of such securities with regular cash flows based on a contractually agreed-upon rates. ABS are typically tranched and structured very similarly to CLOs in both the public and private markets. Traded ABS and 144A ABS are commonly held by income-oriented or credit-focused registered investment companies.
· Leases are income-generating in that they are contracts between an owner of an asset and a user of the asset to pay a regular contractually agreed-upon rate in exchange for the ability to use the asset for an agreed-upon length of time.
· Royalties are income-generating in that they are agreements between an owner of an asset and a provider of capital to share future cash flow streams as they are generated at a contractually agreed-upon rate. Examples include music royalties which generate income as songs are played or healthcare royalties that generate income as drugs are sold.
· Funding agreements in the litigation context are income-generating in that they are bilateral agreements to provide capital for the funding of a specific case or collection of cases in exchange for a contractual rate of return paid in cash or accruing on a periodic basis.
· Litigation/other claims are income-generating in that they are agreements between a plaintiff/law firm/counterparty and a litigation funder/capital provider to share proceeds from the resolution of a legal case or portfolio of cases in exchange for financing. Investments in claims are expected to be structured with priority rights to proceeds and preferred returns, establishing a cash flow stream that resembles debt instruments with annual proceeds paid out to the financing provider.
· Insurance-related assets are income-generating in that they will typically earn an ongoing or accruing yield or contractual return in exchange for providing event or other forms of protection to a counterparty. Insurance-related assets may also include loans to insurance companies as well as loans against insurance contracts, which will typically be structured with a fixed interest rate component.
· Equity interests in private specialty finance companies are income-generating in that such companies are engaged in lending or financing in a variety of contexts and earn ongoing fee streams that are distributed to equity owners. The Fund’s investments in specialty finance companies will typically focus on companies that hold material exposure to loans or financings on balance sheet that generate contractual income.
– 3 –
Comment 4. On cover page (ii), please clarify whether “high yield bonds (“junk bonds”), broadly syndicated levered loans and other traded credit instruments” are alternative credit instruments.
Response 4. The Fund name has been revised to Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund. Given the Fund’s name change, the disclosure has been revised to reflect that the Fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in credit and income related instruments. Accordingly, each of the instruments you have commented on is an alternative credit and income instrument.
* * *
If you would like to discuss any of these responses in further detail or if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (212) 698-3525.
Sincerely,
/s/ Richard Horowitz
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6797
+1 212 698 3500 Main
+1 212 698 3599 Fax
www.dechert.com
Richard Horowitz
richard.horowitz@dechert.com
+1 212 698 3525 Direct
+1 212 698 0452 Fax
January 6, 2023
Lisa N. Larkin, Esq.
Senior Counsel
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Investment Management – Disclosure Review and Accounting
Office
100 F Street NE
Washington, D.C. 20549-0504
Re: Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund
File Nos: 333-266053, 811-23815
Dear Ms. Larkin:
We are writing in
response to comments provided on September 16, 2022 with respect to the registration statement on Form N-2 (the
“Registration Statement”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) filed on August 22, 2022 on behalf of Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund (the “Fund”), a closed-end management investment company. The Fund has considered your comments
and has authorized us, on its behalf, to make the responses and changes discussed below to the Registration Statement. Capitalized
terms have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Registration Statements.
Concurrently with this letter,
the Fund is filing Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement, which reflects the disclosure changes
discussed below.
On behalf of the Fund, set
forth below are the SEC staff’s comments along with our responses to or any supplemental explanations of such comments, as requested.
Facing Sheet
Comment
1. On the facing sheet, please uncheck the box “when
declared effective pursuant to 8(c) of the Securities Act.”
Response
1. The disclosure has been revised accordingly.
Cover Page (ii)
Comment
2. On cover page (ii), the definition of “credit-related
instruments” is too broad given that the fund name contains “alternative credit.” “Alternative credit”
suggests a subset of debt securities. “Originated hybrid securities” seems too broad and “preferred equity securities”
does not seem like it belongs in the 80% bucket. While funds and companies that primarily hold loans or credit-like instruments can be
included, (1) it must be clear that only the underlying debt securities of such a company would count towards the 80% test; and
(2) credit-like instruments are acceptable, but they must be actual credit or debt securities.
– 1 –
Response
2. The Fund name has been revised to Calamos Aksia Alternative
Credit and Income Fund. Given the Fund’s name change, the definition of “credit-related instruments” in the Fund’s
80% policy has been revised to “credit and income related instruments”. “Originated hybrid securities” and “preferred
equity securities” have been redefined as “income producing preferred equity securities”.
Comment
3. On cover page (ii), prong (g) (“other
investments that, as deemed by the Fund, feature significant loan-related characteristics (including, but not limited to, warehouse and
backstop facilities, asset-backed securities, leases, royalties, funding agreements, litigation and other claims, insurance-related assets,
equity ownership in private specialty finance companies, etc.)”) is too broad and does not appear to constitute “credit.”
If any of these investments are not important to the fund strategy, please consider removing them. If the investments are important,
consider changing the fund name in light of Rule 35d-1. For example, a “royalty” does not seem like a credit instrument.
Response
3. The Fund name has been revised to Calamos Aksia Alternative
Credit and Income Fund. Given the Fund’s name change, the disclosure has been revised to reflect that the Fund will invest at least
80% of its assets in credit and income related instruments. Please see the descriptions of the investments below, which clarify how each
investment is a “credit and income related” investment.
· Warehouse
facilities act as a bridge for the transfer of loans from one entity to another,
or to a refinancing by more traditional, longer-term forms of bank financing. The warehouse
provider is generally compensated through the interest earned on the underlying loans during
the hold period, as well as a number of additional fees structured into the warehousing agreement.
We view these facilities as income-generating because their returns are driven by contractual
interest and fees of the underlying private credit instruments.
· Backstop
facilities are utilized by banks, commercial finance companies, or other institutions
that are syndicating loans in order to provide committed capital for those loans in case
they are unable to find a buyer for such loans or source third-party capital. We view
these facilities as income-generating because they generate ongoing fees and, if the backstops
are utilized, provide for the payment of contractual interest over time based on the underlying
loans or credit instruments.
– 2 –
· Asset-backed
securities are investments collateralized by underlying pools of loans or assets
that are income-generating because they provide the holders of such securities with regular
cash flows based on a contractually agreed-upon rates. ABS are typically tranched and
structured very similarly to CLOs in both the public and private markets. Traded ABS and
144A ABS are commonly held by income-oriented or credit-focused registered investment companies.
· Leases are
income-generating in that they are contracts between an owner of an asset and a user of the
asset to pay a regular contractually agreed-upon rate in exchange for the ability to use
the asset for an agreed-upon length of time.
· Royalties are
income-generating in that they are agreements between an owner of an asset and a provider
of capital to share future cash flow streams as they are generated at a contractually agreed-upon
rate. Examples include music royalties which generate income as songs are played or healthcare
royalties that generate income as drugs are sold.
· Funding
agreements in the litigation context are income-generating in that they are bilateral
agreements to provide capital for the funding of a specific case or collection of cases in
exchange for a contractual rate of return paid in cash or accruing on a periodic basis.
· Litigation/other
claims are income-generating in that they are agreements between a plaintiff/law
firm/counterparty and a litigation funder/capital provider to share proceeds from the resolution
of a legal case or portfolio of cases in exchange for financing. Investments in claims are
expected to be structured with priority rights to proceeds and preferred returns, establishing
a cash flow stream that resembles debt instruments with annual proceeds paid out to the financing
provider.
· Insurance-related
assets are income-generating in that they will typically earn an ongoing or
accruing yield or contractual return in exchange for providing event or other forms of protection
to a counterparty. Insurance-related assets may also include loans to insurance companies
as well as loans against insurance contracts, which will typically be structured with a fixed
interest rate component.
· Equity
interests in private specialty finance companies are income-generating in that
such companies are engaged in lending or financing in a variety of contexts and earn ongoing
fee streams that are distributed to equity owners. The Fund’s investments in specialty
finance companies will typically focus on companies that hold material exposure to loans
or financings on balance sheet that generate contractual income.
– 3 –
Comment 4. On
cover page (ii), please clarify whether “high yield bonds (“junk bonds”), broadly syndicated levered loans and
other traded credit instruments” are alternative credit instruments.
Response
4. The Fund name has been revised to Calamos Aksia Alternative
Credit and Income Fund. Given the Fund’s name change, the disclosure has been revised to reflect that the Fund will invest at least
80% of its assets in credit and income related instruments. Accordingly, each of the instruments you have commented on is an alternative
credit and income instrument.
* * *
If you would like to discuss
any of these responses in further detail or if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (212) 698-3525.
Sincerely,
/s/ Richard Horowitz
Richard Horowitz
– 4 –