Correspondence 0001213900-24-085411 from Jyong Biotech Ltd. (MENS)
Jyong Biotech Ltd.
Date: Oct. 4, 2024 · CIK: 0001954488 · Accession: 0001213900-24-085411
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-277725
Referenced dates: September 26, 2024
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
October 4, 2024
Via EDGAR
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Life Sciences
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attn.:
Ibolya Ignat
Mary Mast
Doris Stacey Gama
Joe McCann
Re:
Jyong Biotech Ltd.
Response to the Staff’s Comments on
Registration Statement on Form F-1/A
Filed on September 16, 2024 (File No. 333-277725)
Dear Sir and Madam:
On behalf of our client, Jyong
Biotech Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”), we submit to the staff (the “Staff”)
of the Securities and Exchanges Commission (the “Commission”) this letter setting forth the Company’s responses
to the comments contained in the Staff’s letter dated September 26, 2024 on the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1/A
filed on September 16, 2024 (the “Registration Statement”). Concurrently with the submission of this letter, the
Company is filing amendment No.5 to Registration Statement (the “Amendment No.5”) via EDGAR to the Commission.
The Staff’s comments
are repeated below in bold and are followed by the Company’s responses. We have included page references in the Amendment No.4 where
the language addressing a particular comment appears. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth
in the Amendment No.4.
Overview, page 1
1. We note the disclosure on page 4 above your pipeline table
stating that the following chart illustrates and summarizes your drug candidates if you are unable to establish the comparability between
API-1 and API-2. Please include additional disclosure to highlight that you have not yet proven comparability between API-1 and API-2
and therefore the table summarizes your current status.
Response: In response to the Staff’s comments, the
Company has revised the disclosure on page 4 and page 112 of the Amendment No.5.
2. We continue to object to your presentation of two pipeline
tables on pages 4 and 112. The pipeline table should depict your material product candidates in their current state of development, as
depicted in the first pipeline table. The pipeline table should not assume that the FDA might allow any exceptions to its regular developmental
process that have not been approved or that you have successfully completed tests/trials to the FDA’s satisfaction that have not yet
been performed or remain ongoing. These events are aspirational, and do not reflect the current status of your product candidates. Including
multiple tables does not addresses our concerns about your presentation. Please remove the second table on pages 4 and 112 that illustrates
the status of your drug products if you were to establish comparability between API-1 and API-2.
Response: In response to the Staff’s comments, the
Company has revised the disclosure on page 4 and page 112 of the Amendment No.5.
If the Staff has any questions
or comments concerning the foregoing, or requires any further information, please contact Ross D. Carmel, Esq. at (212) 930-9700 ext.
645 or by email at rcarmel@srfc.law. Alternatively, please contact Shane Wu, Esq. at (202) 322-8852 or by email at swu@srfc.law.
Very truly yours,
Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP
/s/ Ross D. Carmel, Esq.
Ross D. Carmel, Esq.
cc:
Shane Wu, Esq.
1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS | 31ST FLOOR | NEW
YORK, NY | 10036
T (212) 930-9700 | F (212) 930-9725 | WWW.SRFC.LAW