Correspondence 0001493152-23-032164 from Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH)
Globavend Holdings Ltd
Date: Sept. 8, 2023 · CIK: 0001978527 · Accession: 0001493152-23-032164
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-274166
Referenced dates: September 6, 2023
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
September
8, 2023
Via
EDGAR
Division
of Corporation Finance
Office
of Trade & Services
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
100
F Street, NE
Washington,
D.C., 20549
Attention:
Steve
Lo
Kimberly
Calder
Liz
Packebusch
Timothy
S. Levenberg
Re:
Globavend
Holdings Ltd (CIK No. 0001978527)
Registration
Statement on Form F-1
Amended
on September 8, 2023
File
No. 333-274166
Ladies
and Gentlemen:
On
behalf of our client, Globavend Holdings Limited, a foreign private issuer organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Company”),
we submit to the staff (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
this letter setting forth the Company’s responses to the comments contained in the Staff’s letter dated September 6, 2023
on the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 filed on August 23, 2023 (the “Registration Statement”).
Concurrently with the submission of this letter, the Company is filing its amendment no.1 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (the
“Registration Statement No.1”) and certain exhibits via EDGAR to the Commission.
K&L
GATES, SOLICITORS
44th
Floor Edinburgh Tower The Landmark 15 Queen’s Road Central Hong Kong
高蓋茨律師事務所
香港中環皇后大道中15號 置地廣場公爵大廈44樓
T
+852 2230 3500 F +852 2511 9515 klgates.com
Partners
Neil
CAMPBELL
甘寶靈
William
Z. HO
何志淵
Virginia
M.L. TAM
譚敏亮
Sook
Young YEU
呂淑榮
Michael
K.S. CHAN
陳國淳
Jay
J. LEE
李再浩
Choo
Lye TAN
陳珠萊
Eugene
Y.C. YEUNG
楊睿知
Sacha
M. CHEONG
文錦明
Iris
M.K. LEUNG
梁美琪
Vincent
S.K. TSO
曹紹基
Jay
C. CHIU
邱志藩
Scott
D. PETERMAN
畢德民
Christopher
TUNG
董彥華
Paul
R. HASWELL
何
威
Carolyn
H.L. SNG
孫慧蓮
Frank
VOON
溫匯源
Registered
Foreign Lawyer (PRC)
Registered
Foreign Lawyer (California (USA))
Amigo
L. XIE
謝
嵐
Roberta
A. CHANG
張
安
Form
F-1 Filed August 23, 2023
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results
of Operations, page 60
1.
We
note you revised your disclosure on page 59 in response to prior comment 1. We reissue the comment. Please revise your discussion,
to the extent material to an understanding of your results of operations, to quantify for each period presented the impact that foreign
currency movement had on specific line items of revenue and expenses. For example, discussions about changes in the price vs. volume
mix should consider changes in foreign currency fluctuation and how they impacted revenue. Refer to Item 5.A.3. of Form 20-F.
In
response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has included the referenced disclosure on pages 61, 62, 64 and 65 of the Registration
Statement No.1.
Exhibits
Exhibit
5.1
Opinion
of Conyers Dill & Pearman, page II-4
2.
If
counsel intends to use the term “Resale Shares” in the legality opinion, please revise the opinion to define the term
and to opine on the Resale Shares at Section 4.3.
In
response to the Staff’s comment, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company is not registering any of its
shares for resale in this offering. The Company has included a revised legality opinion as exhibit 5.1 of the Registration Statement
No.1, which has removed any references to “Resale Shares”.
3.
At
Section 3.3, counsel states that the legality opinion “is issued solely for the purposes of the filing of the Registration
Statement and the offering of the IPO Shares by the Company and is not to be relied upon in respect of any other matter.” Please
be advised that you may not limit reliance in a manner that excludes anyone entitled to rely on the opinion. Refer to Staff Legal
Bulletin 19 at Section II.B.3.d.
In
response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has included a revised legality opinion as exhibit 5.1 of the Registration
Statement No.1, which has removed the referenced limitation.
4.
Similarly,
please ensure that the opinion includes no assumptions which are overly broad, that “assume away” the relevant issue,
or that assume any of the material facts underlying the opinion or any readily ascertainable facts. For example, in connection with
its Section 4.3 opinion that the shares offered by the selling shareholders “are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable,”
counsel may not assume that such shares “have been fully paid for and the issue price was at or above par value,” as
it does in Section 2.9. Refer to Staff Legal Bulletin 19 at Sections II.B.2.h and II.B.3.a.
In
response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has included a revised legality opinion as exhibit 5.1 of the Registration
Statement No.1, which has removed the referenced assumptions.
General
5.
We
note the proposed offering by the selling shareholders of up to 1,680,210 Ordinary Shares.
It appears that the transaction may be an indirect primary offering with the selling shareholders
acting as a conduit in a distribution to the public. Please provide us with your detailed
analysis as to why the proposed offering is not an indirect primary offering on your behalf
and thus is appropriately characterized as a valid secondary offering under Securities Act
Rule 415(a)(1)(i). For guidance, please see Interpretive Response 612.09 of our Compliance
and Disclosure Interpretations for Securities Act Rules.
In
response to the Staff’s comment, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company is not registering any of its
shares for resale in this offering. The Company has removed the resale prospectus in the Registration Statement No.1.
Very
truly yours,
/s/ Virginia Tam
Name:
Virginia
Tam
Title:
Partner