SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

  LAWRENCE VENICK

                         Partner

                         2206-19 Jardine House

                         1 Connaught Place Central

                         Hong Kong, SAR

  Direct     +852.3923.1188

                         Main       +852.3923.1111

                         Fax         +852.3923.1100

                         lvenick@loeb.com

Via
EDGAR

August
9, 2024

Mr. Dave Edgar/Ms. Kathleen Collins
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 Division of Corporation Finance
 Office of Technology
 Washington, D.C. 20549

    Re:
    Real
    Messenger Corp (the “Company”)

    Amendment
    No. 9 to Registration Statement on Form F-4

    Filed
    August 2, 2024

    File
    No. 333-273102

Dear
Mr. Edgar/Ms. Collins:

As
counsel for the Company and on its behalf, this letter is being submitted in response to the letter dated August 7, 2024 from the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) in which the staff of the Commission (the “Staff”) commented
on the above-referenced Amendment No. 9 to Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed August 2, 2024 (the “Amendment”).

The
Company has filed via EDGAR Amendment No. 10 to the Registration Statement, which reflects the Company’s responses to the comments
received by the Staff and certain updated information. For the Staff’s convenience, the Staff’s comment has been stated below
in its entirety, with the Company’s response set out immediately underneath such comment.

Amendment
No. 9 to Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed August 2, 2024

Real
Messenger Holdings Limited

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13. Subsequent Events, page F-55

1. We
                                            note your response to prior comment 5. Please address the following:

    ●
    Explain
    in further detail why you believe the 1.0 million Class A Ordinary Shares are part of Mr. Ma’s original shareholdings
    and why the issuance of such shares to Mr. Ma was “in substance” a reverse of previously allotted shares from
    Mr. Ma.

Los
Angeles New York Chicago Nashville Washington, DC San Francisco Beijing Hong Kong www.loeb.com

For
the United States offices, a limited liability partnership including professional corporations. For Hong Kong office, a limited liability
partnership.

  Securities and Exchange Commission

                         Page 2

    ●
    Specifically
    address the fact that at March 31, 2022, prior to the issuance of such shares to Mr. Eklund, there were no Class A Ordinary Shares
    outstanding and how this factors into your statement that the shares awarded to Mr. Eklund were from Mr. Ma and not the company.

    ●
    Clarify
    whether the issuance of Class A Ordinary Shares in the statement of shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2023 represents the shares
    issued to Mr. Eklund. If so, explain why you believe the transfer of Mr. Eklund’s shares to Mr. Ma represents the return of
    shares to the “original shareholder.”

    ●
    To
    the extent Mr. Ma did not hold Class A Ordinary Shares prior to the company issuing restricted shares to Mr. Eklund, explain further
    how you determined that the issuance of such shares to Mr. Ma after Mr. Eklund’s departure was not compensatory.

    ●
    Tell
    us how your disclosures on page 16, where you state the company repurchased shares previously issued to Mr. Eklund, supports your
    assertion that Mr. Ma previously owned the shares.

    ●
    Provide
    any specific guidance considered in your analysis.

Response:
The Company respectfully clarifies with the Staff that it believes that the issuance of the 1,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares
to Kwai Hoi, Ma’s wholly owned company, Bloomington DH Holdings Limited, (the “Ma Share Issuance”) was not compensatory.

1,000,000
Class A Ordinary Shares were originally issued to Mr. Fredrick Eklund as restricted shares. The agreement governing these restricted
shares provided for vesting conditions such that the restrictions would lapse in full on the date that both (i) the Business Combination
is consummated and (ii) such that Mr. Eklund remained an active employee of Real Messenger and/or any successor entity (such as
PubCo).

Effective
February 11, 2024, in connection with the end of Real Messenger’s employment relationship with Mr. Eklund, this agreement was terminated
by its terms, with the vesting conditions unmet. Real Messenger exercised its option to repurchase all of the 1,000,000 Class
A Ordinary Shares granted to Mr. Eklund under the agreement, at the original purchase price of $0.0001 per share, or $100 in the aggregate
(the “Repurchase”), on April 19, 2024. After the Repurchase, Real Messenger and Mr. Ma completed the Ma Share Issuance, also
on April 19, 2024.

The
Company believes that the Ma Share Issuance was not compensatory, because the Ma Share Issuance did not provide Mr. Ma with any incremental
value (in terms of his portion of the Merger Consideration) that could be characterized as compensatory value. Whether or not the Ma
Share Issuance occurred, Mr. Ma (including for these purposes his affiliates, specifically his wife and his and her personal holding
companies) will be entitled to receive the full $45 million portion of the Merger Consideration that the terms of the merger agreement
between Nova Vision and Real Messenger, as amended to date (the “Merger Agreement”), clearly provide will be payable to him
and such affiliates.

Specifically,
the Merger Agreement provides as follows:

“All
of the Merger Consideration will be payable (i) if to the Principal Shareholder, in Class B Purchaser Ordinary Shares, and (ii) if to
any Shareholder other than the Principal Shareholder, in Class A Purchaser Ordinary Shares.”

  Securities and Exchange Commission

                         Page 3

The
Merger Agreement provides that the Principal Shareholder (Mr. Ma and his affiliates) is to receive $45 million of the total $64
million Merger Consideration.

Whether
or not the Principal Shareholder owns Class A Ordinary Shares or Class B Ordinary Shares of Real Messenger immediately prior to the closing,
the Principal Shareholder will receive all of his $45 million portion in Class B Purchaser Ordinary Shares. The Merger Agreement provides
that in both of the following scenarios: (1) the Ma Share Issuance occurred and (2) the Ma Share Issuance did not occur, Mr. Ma
and his affiliates, as the Principal Shareholder, will receive the same exact consideration, namely, $45 million in Class B Purchaser
Ordinary Shares. The value to Mr. Ma and his affiliates in both of these scenarios is identical; therefore, the occurrence of
the Ma Share Issuance has no economic effect on Mr. Ma or his affiliates, and therefore it does not create a compensatory event.

At
the time that the Merger Agreement was originally signed, the expectation of the parties was that Mr. Ma and his affiliates would receive
80% of the total Merger Consideration allotted to the then existing Real Messenger Shareholders, and that Mr. Eklund would satisfy his
vesting conditions and have the restrictions on his Real Messenger shares removed at the Closing, so that he would own 20% of the economic
aspect of the Merger Consideration payable to the Company’s co-founders. Their agreement at that time was that Mr. Ma would enjoy
voting control of the public company from and after the closing of the Merger.

With
Mr. Eklund’s exit from the Company in early 2024, Mr. Ma and his affiliates became the only founding shareholders of Real Messenger
and, as such, were entitled to 100% of the Merger Consideration allotted to the Real Messenger founding shareholders (i.e.,
$45 million), to be  payable to them 100% in Class B Purchaser Ordinary Shares. The Ma Share Issuance did not change
the allocation of the Merger Consideration; the Real Messenger founding shareholders were to receive $45 million of the Merger Consideration
both before and after the occurrence of the Ma Share Issuance.

*
* *

  Securities and Exchange Commission

                         Page 4

Please
contact the undersigned at (852) 3923-1188 if you have any questions with respect to the response contained in this letter.

  Sincerely,

  /s/ Lawrence
  S. Venick

  Lawrence Venick

  Partner

cc:
Kwai Hoi Ma