SEC Comment Letter 0000000000-24-002889 to SCHMID Group N.V. (SHMD)
SCHMID Group N.V.
Date: March 15, 2024 · CIK: 0001987240 · Accession: 0000000000-24-002889
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-274701
Show Raw Text
United States securities and exchange commission logo
March 15, 2024
Stefan Berger
Director
Pegasus TopCo B.V.
Robert-Bosch-Str. 32-36,
72250
Freudenstadt, Germany
Re:Pegasus TopCo B.V.
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form F-4
Filed March 12, 2024
File No. 333-274701
Dear Stefan Berger:
We have reviewed your amended registration statement and have the following
comments.
Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the
requested information. If you do not believe a comment applies to your facts and circumstances
or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.
After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you
provide in response to this letter, we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise,
any references to prior comments are to comments in our March 6, 2024 letter.
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form F-4
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information, page 181
1.We note your response to prior comment 3. While we understand there might be
significant estimates involved in the determination of the fair value of the Earnout shares,
Rule 11-02(6) of Regulation S-X requires that pro forma adjustments be made using
information as of the most recent practicable date. As such, estimates should be made
using the share price of TopCo Ordinary shares and other assumptions as of a recent date.
As noted by Rule 11-02(10), if the transaction is structured in such a manner that
significantly different results may occur, the company can provide additional pro forma
presentations which give effect to the range of possible results. Please clarify if the
compensation charge calculated under IFRS 2, using assumptions as of the most recent
FirstName LastNameStefan Berger
Comapany NamePegasus TopCo B.V.
March 15, 2024 Page 2
FirstName LastName
Stefan Berger
Pegasus TopCo B.V.
March 15, 2024
Page 2
practicable date, is zero, or is not material. If so, revise your disclosure to describe the
significant assumptions made and the basis for these assumptions. If not, revise your
presentation to include the compensation expense as calculated under IFRS 2 and describe
the significant assumptions made and the basis for these assumptions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources, page 206
2.We note your response to prior comment 4 that you do not believe the restrictions
mentioned within page 59 meet the requirements of “restricted net assets” as defined in
Rule 1-02(dd) of Regulation S-X. Your risk factor disclosure cites common
restrictions for Chinese based companies that have resulted in Rule 4-08(e) and 5-04 of
Regulation S-X disclosures in practice. You disclose: “As a result, our Chinese
subsidiaries may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash outside of China whether in
the form of dividends, loans or advances. These restrictions and requirements could
reduce the amount of distributions that we receive from our subsidiaries, which would
restrict our ability to fund our operations, generate income, pay dividends, and service our
indebtedness.” Also, you note as an example that the company entered into a licensing
agreement with a Chinese subsidiary and in payment, €15 million was transferred out of
the subsidiary to the company. However, Rule 1-02(dd) of Regulation S-X defines
Restricted Net Assets as those that may not be transferred to the parent company by
subsidiaries in the form of loans, advances or cash dividends without the consent of a third
party (i.e., lender, regulatory agency, foreign government, etc.). It appears that the
licensing arrangement involves the payment of compensation in exchange for products or
services. Clarify how you consider this arrangement to be included in this
definition. Please also clarify whether under current Chinese law your Chinese subsidiary
can only pay dividends out of retained earnings and, if so, how you considered this in
determining its ability to transfer its net assets to you in the form of loans, advances or
cash dividends. To the extent these restricted net assets meet the quantitative thresholds in
Rule 5-04 of Regulation S-X, please include Schedule 1 and the disclosures required by
Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X. Also, see Instruction 5 to Item 303(b) of Regulation
S-K.
Please contact Laura Veator at 202-551-3716 or Stephen Krikorian at 202-551-3488 if
you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please
contact Alexandra Barone at 202-551-8816 or Jeff Kauten at 202-551-3447 with any other
questions.
Sincerely,
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Technology
cc: George Hacket