Correspondence 0001493152-24-049940 from Old Glory Holding Co (CIK 0002016561)
Old Glory Holding Co (CIK 0002016561)
Date: Dec. 13, 2024 · CIK: 0002016561 · Accession: 0001493152-24-049940
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 024-12512
Referenced dates: December 12, 2024
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Old
Glory Holding Company
3401
NW 63rd Street, Suite 600
Oklahoma
City, OK 73116
December 13,
2024
Mr.
Robert Arzonetti
US
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporation Finance
Office
of Finance
Re:
Old
Glory Holding Company
Offering
Statement on Form 1-A
File
No. 024-12512
Dear
Robert:
Thank
you for your letter dated December 12, 2024, relating to our issuance of Class B Common Stock in Old Glory Holding Company, a Delaware
Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to our Amended Form 1-A, dated November 25, 2024. As always, we appreciate the
thorough work by you and your colleagues.
Accompanying
this letter is a red-line of our Amended Form 1-A, dated December 13, 2024, that is compared to our November 25, 2024 Amendment.
In
response to your questions and comments, here are our responses, which follow the same number sequence in your letter. The pages numbers
referenced below align with the accompanying red-line.
Form
1-A
1. We
made these requested changes to page 4.
2. We
made this requested change to page 4.
3. In
Section 5.3 of the Subscription Agreement, we deleted the “Waiver of Jury Trial.”
Thus, on page 30 (previously 31), we deleted the applicable disclosure about waiving a jury
trial.
1 | Page
4. Management
does not take the view that Old Glory Bank is competing with any particular bank, in any
given business line or market, including the State of Oklahoma. Old Glory Bank has customers
in all 50 states and, thus, Management believes it is impossible to explain the differences
in our business lines (deposit accounts, CDs, home loans, business loans, etc.) against the
4,577 banks available across America, including the 50-state mega banks. Management continues
to believe that because of the rapid ascent of online banking services, customers frequently
consider banking services to be a commodity, indistinguishable among the various 50-state
banks, which is why Old Glory Bank always talks to customers about brand, values and customer
service. Old Glory Bank does not promote interest rates, because we do not make interest
rates a distinguishing factor. Old Glory Bank does not promote “mortgage rates,”
because mortgage rates are driven by the secondary market and are not a distinguishing factor.
Old Glory Bank does not promote interest rates for SBA loans, because SBA loans are primarily
driven by the SBA, and are not a distinguishing factor. Instead, while every 50-state mega
bank generally has capable technology to compete with Old Glory Bank, Management believes
the actual competition to Old Glory Bank is from the “friction” of a customer
opening a new bank account, plus the ensuing journey of setting up direct deposit and becoming
top of wallet. We believe we properly describe this within our Offering Circular, including
on page 46 (previously 47). For example, the reason why we created and launched Old Glory
Cash-IN, was not to compete with any particular bank, but to remove a “friction”
point of customers depositing cash via an online bank. In summary, we believe our primary
competitor is not actually from other banks (even the mega banks), but competition for the
“time and attention” required from a “busy” customer to open a new
account and then start using Old Glory Bank. This is why we focus our attention on products
and customer service, and not on other banks.
5. Our
previous response was intended to comment on the restriction relating to dividends, bonuses,
etc., not the 14% Tier 1 Leverage Ratio. There is no express regulatory requirement for a
14% Tier I Leverage Ratio. 12 CFR 324.10 requires a 4% leverage ratio and the CBLR requires
a 9% leverage ratio. Old Glory Bank is currently bound to 14% leverage ratio because Old
Glory Bank was contractually committed to such 14% in 2022, as a pre-condition to obtaining
approval to purchase First State Bank. Such 14% commitment was then re-affirmed in the Consent
Order. While this was mentioned on Page 101 (previously, page 104), Management recognizes
that its discussion did not perfectly clarify that such 14% leverage ratio actually first
originated from a contractual commitment made in 2022, not the Consent Order, so we have
made those updates therein. Both Management and our Board of Directors, including Mr. Joe
Meade, believe that once Old Glory Bank is profitable (and assuming then in compliance with
applicable rules and regulations), there will be no continuing justification for the regulators
to require such a high leverage ratio. Instead, we believe Old Glory bank will be successful
in having a typical leverage ratio that is typical for a comparably sized bank, which Management
and our Board believes in their experience, to be 7% - 9%.
For
context, many people confuse risk weighted leverage ratios with this tier 1 leverage ratio. A risk weighted leverage ratio is
different than a tier 1 leverage ratio. Old Glory Bank has no special commitments relating to risk weighted ratios and, thus, no special
limitation on loans, etc.
Long-term,
Management does not believe there will be any impact from this 14% Tier 1 Leverage Ratio, which originated in 2022, because Management
does not believe that this high leverage ratio will exist long-term for the reasons described above. In the short-term, this 14% Tier
1 Leverage Ratio is a burden on capital raising and does require Old Glory Holding Company to raise additional capital by issuing additional
shares (which other banks of a comparable size may not have to raise). These additional shares from this additional capital does create
dilution, reduced EPS, and reduced ROE. However, we believe we properly show the dilution of the issuance of these shares in our Offering
Circular.
2 | Page
Interestingly,
in the short-term, a higher Tier 1 Leverage Ratio could actually increase the profitability of Old Glory Bank because it raises our “legal
lending limit,” and provides additional “cash” on our balance sheet earning interest at the Federal Funds rate. With
regard to lending, a bank’s “legal lending limit” is tied to tier 1 capital (not deposits, like many people believe).
Thus, the higher the tier 1 capital, the higher a bank’s legal lending limit. So, Old Glory Bank, with a disproportionately higher
tier 1 leverage ratio, can actually originate fewer, larger loans, as compared to a typical bank of its size, which likely has less tier
1 capital and a lower legal lending limit. With the typical number of FTEs for a bank of our size, it may be more profitable to do fewer,
larger loans, than other banks of our size can legally do. However, please note that this discussion about the legal lending limit is
only for purposes of this Comment and not to suggest any change in the lending strategy of Old Glory Bank that is adopted by our Board
of Directors from time to time.
6-11 We
made the decision to delete our 5-Year Projections (and applicable commentary) from our Offering
Circular and, thus, we believe these comments are no longer applicable. Many pages of the
Offering Circular were impacted by this change, and the bulk of such changes are on pages
14 (previously 15), 58 (previously 59), and 85-88 (previously 86-91).
12. We
added new risk language on Page 42 (previously 43), Business Banking Product, and Page 101
(previously 104), Capital Requirements.
13. We
made these requested changes on Pages 102 (previously 105).
14. We
made these changes on Pages 14 (previously 15) and 102 (previously 105).
Again,
we thank you and your colleagues for the review of our materials, which we believe we have now addressed.
Please
let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Old
Glory Holding Company
By:
/s/
Michael P. Ring
Michael
P. Ring
President
and CEO
3 | Page