SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0001213900-24-085093 from Health In Tech, Inc. (HIT)

Health In Tech, Inc.
Date: Oct. 3, 2024 · CIK: 0002019505 · Accession: 0001213900-24-085093

Regulatory Compliance Financial Reporting Risk Disclosure

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-281853

Referenced dates: October 2, 2024

Date
October 3, 2024
Author
/s/ Alexandria E. Kane
Form
CORRESP
Company
Health In Tech, Inc.

Letter

Via Edgar Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Health In Tech, Inc. Amendment No. 1 toForm S-1 filed October 2, 2024 File No. 333-281853

Dear Messrs. Schiffman and Lopez:

On behalf of our client, Health In Tech, Inc. (the “Company” or “HIT”), we hereby provide a response to the comments issued in a letter dated October 2, 2024 (the “Staff’s Letter”) regarding the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”). Contemporaneously, we are filing a revised Registration Statement via Edgar (the “Amended Registration Statement”).

For ease of reference, the comments contained in the Staff’s Letter are reproduced below and are followed by the Company’s response. All page references in the response set forth below refer to the page numbers in the Amended Registration Statement.

Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1

Principal Stockholders, page 92

1. Please revise to identify the natural person with voting and dispositive power associated with the shares held by Zhong Yang Securities Limited.

Response: The disclosure on pages 93 and Alt-5 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

Exhibit 5.1, page II-3

2. Reference is made to the final sentence of the opinion where counsel states, “We are licensed to practice law in the State of Ohio and the United States of America.” We note that the company is incorporated in Nevada. In the staff’s view, stating that counsel is licensed to practice in the State of Ohio represents a qualification as to jurisdiction. Please revise the opinion.

Response: The opinion of counsel filed as Exhibit 5.1 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

3. Additionally, we note the opinion refers to “Units” when the offering is for common stock, and the opinion does not address the resale shares. Please file a corrected legal opinion.

Response: The opinion of counsel filed as Exhibit 5.1 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

General

4. Please revise Risk Factors and Description of Capital Stock to discuss the exclusive forum provision which appears in Section 7.06 of Exhibit 3.2. We note that Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and under Section 22 of the Securities Act, federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over claims arising under the Securities Act. Please disclose that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If this provision does not apply to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, please also ensure that the exclusive forum provision in the governing documents states this clearly, or tell us how you will inform investors in future filings that the provision does not apply to any actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act.

Response: The disclosure on pages 33 and 97 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

Please call me at 212 407-4017 if you would like additional information with respect to any of the foregoing. Thank you.

Sincerely,
/s/ Alexandria E. Kane

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    Alexandria E. Kane

                           Partner

                           345 Park Avenue
 New York, NY 10154

    Direct    212.407.4017
 Main      212.407.4000
 Fax         212.407.4990
 akane@loeb.com

    Via Edgar

October 3, 2024

Todd Schiffman and James Lopez

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

    Re:
    Health In Tech, Inc.

    Amendment No. 1 toForm S-1 filed October 2, 2024

    File No. 333-281853

Dear Messrs. Schiffman and Lopez:

On behalf of our client, Health In Tech, Inc.
(the “Company” or “HIT”), we hereby provide a response to the comments issued in a letter dated October 2, 2024
(the “Staff’s Letter”) regarding the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”).
Contemporaneously, we are filing a revised Registration Statement via Edgar (the “Amended Registration Statement”).

For ease of reference, the comments contained
in the Staff’s Letter are reproduced below and are followed by the Company’s response. All page references in the response
set forth below refer to the page numbers in the Amended Registration Statement.

Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1

Principal Stockholders, page 92

    1.
    Please revise to identify the natural person with voting and dispositive power associated with the shares held by Zhong Yang Securities Limited.

Response: The disclosure on pages 93 and Alt-5 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

Exhibit 5.1, page II-3

    2.
    Reference is made to the final sentence of the opinion where counsel states, “We are licensed to practice law in the State of Ohio and the United States of America.” We note that the company is incorporated in Nevada. In the staff’s view, stating that counsel is licensed to practice in the State of Ohio represents a qualification as to jurisdiction. Please revise the opinion.

Response: The opinion of counsel
filed as Exhibit 5.1 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

    3.
    Additionally, we note the opinion refers to “Units” when the offering is for common stock, and the opinion does not address the resale shares. Please file a corrected legal opinion.

Response: The opinion of counsel
filed as Exhibit 5.1 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

General

    4.
    Please revise Risk Factors and Description of Capital Stock to discuss the exclusive forum provision which appears in Section 7.06 of Exhibit 3.2. We note that Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and under Section 22 of the Securities Act, federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over claims arising under the Securities Act. Please disclose that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If this provision does not apply to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, please also ensure that the exclusive forum provision in the governing documents states this clearly, or tell us how you will inform investors in future filings that the provision does not apply to any actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act.

Response: The disclosure on pages 33 and 97 has been revised in response to the Staff’s comment.

Please call me at 212 407-4017
if you would like additional information with respect to any of the foregoing. Thank you.

Sincerely,

    /s/ Alexandria E. Kane

    Alexandria E. Kane

    Partner