SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0001213900-24-059526 from Silexion Therapeutics Corp (SLXN)

Silexion Therapeutics Corp
Date: July 5, 2024 · CIK: 0002022416 · Accession: 0001213900-24-059526

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-279281

Date
July 5, 2024
Author
/s/ Ilan Levin
Form
CORRESP
Company
Silexion Therapeutics Corp

Letter

Biomotion Sciences

250 Park Avenue, 7th Floor

New York, NY 10177

Telephone: (212) 572-6395

July 5, 2024

VIA EDGAR

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

Office of Finance

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Attention: Franklin Wyman

Kevin Vaughn

Daniel Crawford

Tim Buchmiller

Re: Biomotion Sciences

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4

Filed June 24, 2024

SEC File Number 333-279281

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of Biomotion Sciences (“Biomotion” or the “Company”), we have provided below the Company’s responses to the comments of the Staff (the “Staff”) of the Division of Corporation Finance, Office of Life Sciences of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) relating to Amendment No. 1, filed on June 24, 2024 (“Amendment No. 1”), to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, which was originally filed on May 9, 2024 (the “Registration Statement”), as set forth in the Staff’s letter to the Company dated July 3, 2024 (the “Comment Letter”).

For convenience of reference, the text of the comments in the Staff’s letter has been reproduced in bold text below. The Company has provided its response immediately after each numbered comment. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (the “Amended Registration Statement”), which the Company is filing concurrently herewith with the Commission through the Commission’s EDGAR system.

Questions and Answers About the Proposals

Q: What interests do our Sponsor, current officers, directors and advisors have in the Business

Combination?, page 14

1. We note your response to prior comment 7 and reissue. Please clarify here and elsewhere as appropriate if the sponsor and its affiliates can earn a positive rate of return on their investment, even if other SPAC shareholders experience a negative rate of return in the post-business combination company.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has added the requested disclosure (and quantitative information) regarding the Sponsor’s ability to earn a positive rate of return even if other SPAC shareholders experience a negative rate of return in the post-business combination company. Appropriate disclosures to that effect have been added in the “Questions and Answers About the Proposals”, “Summary of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus” and “Risk Factors” sections of the Amended Registration Statement.

Summary of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus

Silexion, page 25

2. Please revise where you discuss the results of the Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for Loder to state whether the trials met their primary and secondary endpoints and whether the trials were powered for statistical significance, and if so, state so and provide the p-values.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure in the Amended Registration Statement to state whether the trials met their primary and secondary endpoints and to disclose that the trials were not powered for statistical significance.

Information About Silexion

Pre-Clinical Studies, page 163

3. We note your revised disclosure in response to prior comment 22. Please further revise to describe the pre-clinical studies and data relied upon in determining to advance SIL-204B into clinical development rather than the first-generation product.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure in the Amended Registration Statement to describe the pre-clinical studies and data relied upon in determining to advance SIL-204B into clinical development.

Phase 2 Clinical Study, page 165

4.

We note your response to prior comment 24 and reissue in part. Please revise to state whether the Phase 2 Clinical Study met its endpoints.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure in the Amended Registration Statement as to whether the Phase 2 clinical study met its endpoints.

*********

If you have any comments or questions regarding the foregoing., please direct them to Brian N. Wheaton, Esq., at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, our U.S. legal counsel, at (212) 801-6914 or wheatonb@gtlaw.com, or to Jonathan M. Nathan, Adv., at Meitar Law Offices, our Israeli legal counsel, at +972-52-312-5574 or jonathann@meitar.com. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in connection with this matter.

Sincerely,
/s/ Ilan Levin

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Biomotion Sciences

250 Park Avenue, 7th Floor

New York, NY 10177

Telephone: (212) 572-6395

July 5, 2024

VIA EDGAR

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

Office of Finance

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

    Attention:
    Franklin Wyman

    Kevin Vaughn

    Daniel Crawford

    Tim Buchmiller

    Re:
    Biomotion Sciences

    Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4

    Filed June 24, 2024

    SEC File Number 333-279281

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of Biomotion Sciences (“Biomotion”
or the “Company”), we have provided below the Company’s responses to the comments of the Staff (the “Staff”)
of the Division of Corporation Finance, Office of Life Sciences of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
relating to Amendment No. 1, filed on June 24, 2024 (“Amendment No. 1”), to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-4, which was originally filed on May 9, 2024 (the “Registration Statement”), as set forth in the Staff’s
letter to the Company dated July 3, 2024 (the “Comment Letter”).

For convenience of reference, the text of the comments
in the Staff’s letter has been reproduced in bold text below. The Company has provided its response immediately after each numbered
comment. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement (the “Amended Registration Statement”), which the Company is filing concurrently herewith with the Commission
through the Commission’s EDGAR system.

Questions and Answers About the Proposals

Q: What interests do our Sponsor, current officers, directors and
advisors have in the Business

Combination?, page 14

    1.
    We note your response to prior comment 7 and reissue. Please clarify here and elsewhere as appropriate if the sponsor and its affiliates can earn a positive rate of return on their investment, even if other SPAC shareholders experience a negative rate of return in the post-business combination company.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment,
the Company has added the requested disclosure (and quantitative information) regarding the Sponsor’s ability to earn a positive
rate of return even if other SPAC shareholders experience a negative rate of return in the post-business combination company. Appropriate
disclosures to that effect have been added in the “Questions and Answers About the Proposals”, “Summary of the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus” and “Risk Factors” sections of the Amended Registration Statement.

Summary of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus

Silexion, page 25

    2.
    Please revise where you discuss the results of the Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for Loder to state whether the trials met their primary and secondary endpoints and whether the trials were powered for statistical significance, and if so, state so and provide the p-values.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment,
the Company has revised its disclosure in the Amended Registration Statement to state whether the trials met their primary and secondary
endpoints and to disclose that the trials were not powered for statistical significance.

Information About Silexion

Pre-Clinical Studies, page 163

    3.
    We note your revised disclosure in response to prior comment 22. Please further revise to describe the pre-clinical studies and data relied upon in determining to advance SIL-204B into clinical development rather than the first-generation product.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment,
the Company has revised its disclosure in the Amended Registration Statement to describe the pre-clinical studies and data relied upon
in determining to advance SIL-204B into clinical development.

Phase 2 Clinical Study, page 165

    4.

    We note your response to prior comment 24 and reissue in part.
    Please revise to state whether the Phase 2 Clinical Study met its endpoints.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment,
the Company has revised its disclosure in the Amended Registration Statement as to whether the Phase 2 clinical study met its endpoints.

*********

    2

If you have any comments or questions regarding
the foregoing., please direct them to Brian N. Wheaton, Esq., at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, our U.S. legal counsel, at (212) 801-6914 or
wheatonb@gtlaw.com, or to Jonathan M. Nathan, Adv., at Meitar Law Offices, our Israeli legal counsel, at +972-52-312-5574 or jonathann@meitar.com.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation in connection with this matter.

    Sincerely,

    /s/ Ilan Levin

    Ilan Levin

    Chief Executive Officer

    CC:

    Gil Maman

    Biomotion Sciences

Mark S. Selinger, Esq.

Brian N. Wheaton, Esq.

Gary Emmanuel, Esq.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

J. David Chertok, Adv.

Jonathan M. Nathan, Adv.

Elad Ziv, Adv.

Meitar Law Offices

3