SEC Company Response from Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd (BTFT) (CIK 0002046216) — Aug 11, 2025
Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd (BTFT) (CIK 0002046216)
Date: Aug. 11, 2025 · CIK: 0002046216 · Accession: 0001213900-25-074510
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-287759
Referenced dates: August 6, 2025, June 24, 2025
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Xiaoqin (“Sherry”) Li
Senior Counsel
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154
Direct 212.407.4939
Main 212.407.4000
Fax 212.407.4990
xli@loeb.com
August 11, 2025
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Trade & Services
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attn: Todd Schiffman and James Lopez
Re: Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd
Amended Form F-1 filed July 18, 2025
File No. 333-287759
Dear Messrs. Schiffman and Lopez:
On behalf of our client, Beta FinTech
Holdings Ltd (the “Company”), we hereby provide a response to the comments issued in a letter dated August 6, 2025 (the “Staff’s
Letter”) regarding the Company’s Amended Registration Statement on Form F-1 (the “Amendment No. 2”) filed July
18, 2025. Contemporaneously, we are filing an Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form F-1 (the “Amendment No. 3”)
via Edgar.
In order to facilitate the review
by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) of the Amendment No. 3, we have responded, on behalf
of the Company, to the comments set forth in the Staff’s Letter on a point-by-point basis. The numbered paragraphs set forth below
respond to the Staff’s comments and correspond to the numbered paragraph in the Staff’s Letter.
Amended Form F-1 filed July 18, 2025
Underwriting Services for U.S. dollar-denominated Municipal
Bonds of PRC Companies, page 94
1. Please refer to comment 3 from our letter dated June 24, 2025. We note the discussion of due diligence provided by third-party professional
institutions in Mainland China, including PRC counsels for due diligence, auditing firms and translation agencies. However, we also note
the statements on the cover page and elsewhere that (1) none of the PRC laws and regulations apply to the Group’s business, “regardless
of whether directly or indirectly via counterparties or other third parties,” and (2) the Group does not have any material operations
in Mainland China. In light of the indirect due diligence and other operations in Mainland China through third parties, please revise
to reconcile with the statements that PRC laws and regulations do not indirectly apply. Please include approximate, quantitative disclosure
regarding the operations using third-parties to conduct due diligence and other activities in Mainland China. We also note that you are
relying on PRC counsel, AllBright Law Offices. However, it does not appear as if the operations using third-parties in Mainland China
are covered in their Opinion filed as Exhibit 99.2. Please revise accordingly.
Response: In response
to the Staff’s comments, the Company has revised the disclosures on cover page, pages 7 and 98 to clarify that PRC laws and regulations
do not directly apply to the Group’s business. The Company has also included approximate, quantitative disclosure regarding the
operations using third-parties to conduct due diligence and other activities in Mainland China on page 94. The Company has also filed
an updated opinion of its PRC counsel as Exhibit 99.2.
August 11, 2025
Page 2
Please call me at 212-407-4939 if you would like
additional information with respect to any of the foregoing. Thank you.
Sincerely,
/s/ Xiaoqin (Sherry) Li
Xiaoqin (“Sherry”) Li
Senior Counsel