SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

CORRESP Filing

Emmis Acquisition Corp.
Date: Sept. 17, 2025 · CIK: 0002075816 · Accession: 0001213900-25-088350

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-288530

Date
September 17, 2025
Author
/s/ Peter Goldstein
Form
CORRESP
Company
Emmis Acquisition Corp.

Letter

Via EDGAR Division of Corporation Finance Office of Real Estate and Construction Attn: Ms. Gorman / Ms. Breslin Re: Emmis Acquisition Corp. Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 Filed September 12, 2025 File No. 333-288530

Dear Ms. Gorman / Ms. Breslin

On behalf of Emmis Acquisition Corp. (the " Company "), we have set forth below responses to the comments of the staff (the " Staff ") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the " SEC ") contained in its letter of September 16, 2025 with respect to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the " Form S-1 ") as noted above.

For your convenience, the text of the Staff's comments is set forth below in bold, followed in each case by the Company's responses. Please note that all references to page numbers in the responses are references to the page numbers in the Amendment No. 4 to the Form S-1 (the " S-1 ") submitted concurrently with the submission of this letter in response to the Staff's comments.

Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1

Part II. Information not Required in Prospectus

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, page II-3

1. Please request that U.S. counsel revise its legal opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 to remove inappropriate assumptions. In particular, we note assumption (f). We note it is not appropriate to assume any of the material facts underlying the opinion or any readily ascertainable facts, or to include assumptions that "assume away" the relevant issue. For guidance, please refer to Section II.B.3.a of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19.

Response: The Company has included a revised legal opinion as Exhibit 5.1.

2. Please request that Cayman counsel revised its legal opinion filed as Exhibit 5.2 to remove inappropriate assumptions. As but some examples, see assumptions 13, 18 and 19. It is not appropriate for a counsel to include in its opinion assumptions that assume any of the material facts underlying the opinion or any readily ascertainable facts, or that "assume away" the relevant issue. For guidance, refer to Section II.B.3.a of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19.

Response: . The Company has included a revised legal opinion as Exhibit 5.2.

3.

We note your disclosure on page 70 stating "Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the courts of the Cayman Islands shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim or dispute." We also note your disclosure on the cover page that your "amended and restated memorandum and articles of association prohibit redemptions in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets, after payment of the business combination marketing fees, to be less than $5,000,001," and that the table on page 81 "gives effect to the limitation under our restated and amended memorandum and articles of association that will prohibit redemptions in an amount that would cause [your] net tangible assets, to be less than $5,000,001." However, these provisions do not appear in the Form of Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association filed as Exhibit 3.2. Please revise your disclosure or your Form of Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association as appropriate.

Response: . The Company has included a revised Form of Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association as Exhibit 3.2.

We trust that the above is responsive to your comments.

Should you have any questions relating to the foregoing or wish to discuss any aspect of the Company's filing, please contact Ross Carmel, Esq of Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP at 646-838-1310.

Sincerely,
/s/ Peter Goldstein

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
 1
 filename1.htm

 September 17, 2025

 Via EDGAR

 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

 Division of Corporation Finance

 Office of Real Estate and Construction

 100 F Street, N.E.

 Washington, D.C. 20549

 Attn:
 Ms. Gorman / Ms. Breslin

 Re:
 Emmis Acquisition Corp.

 Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
 Filed September 12, 2025

 File No. 333-288530

 Dear Ms. Gorman / Ms. Breslin

 On behalf of Emmis Acquisition Corp. (the " Company "),
we have set forth below responses to the comments of the staff (the " Staff ") of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the " SEC ") contained in its letter of September 16, 2025 with respect to the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (the " Form S-1 ") as noted above.

 For your convenience, the text of the Staff's
comments is set forth below in bold, followed in each case by the Company's responses. Please note that all references to page numbers
in the responses are references to the page numbers in the Amendment No. 4 to the Form S-1 (the " S-1 ") submitted concurrently
with the submission of this letter in response to the Staff's comments.

 Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement
on Form S-1

 Part II. Information not Required in Prospectus

 Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement
Schedules, page II-3

 1.
 Please request that U.S. counsel revise its legal opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 to remove inappropriate assumptions. In particular, we note assumption (f). We note it is not appropriate to assume any of the material facts underlying the opinion or any readily ascertainable facts, or to include assumptions that "assume away" the relevant issue. For guidance, please refer to Section II.B.3.a of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19.

 Response: The Company has included a revised legal opinion as Exhibit 5.1.

 2.
 Please request that Cayman counsel revised its legal opinion filed as Exhibit 5.2 to remove inappropriate assumptions. As but some examples, see assumptions 13, 18 and 19. It is not appropriate for a counsel to include in its opinion assumptions that assume any of the material facts underlying the opinion or any readily ascertainable facts, or that "assume away" the relevant issue. For guidance, refer to Section II.B.3.a of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19.

 Response: . The Company has included a revised legal opinion as Exhibit 5.2.

 3.

 We note your disclosure on page 70 stating
 "Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an
 alternative forum, the courts of the Cayman Islands shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim or dispute." We also note your
 disclosure on the cover page that your "amended and restated memorandum and articles of association prohibit redemptions in an amount
 that would cause our net tangible assets, after payment of the business combination marketing fees, to be less than $5,000,001,"
 and that the table on page 81 "gives effect to the limitation under our restated and amended memorandum and articles of association
 that will prohibit redemptions in an amount that would cause [your] net tangible assets, to be less than
 $5,000,001." However, these provisions
 do not appear in the Form of Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association filed as Exhibit 3.2. Please revise your disclosure
 or your Form of Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association as appropriate.

 Response: . The Company has included a revised Form of Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association as Exhibit 3.2.

 We trust that the above is responsive to your
comments.

 Should you have any questions relating to the
foregoing or wish to discuss any aspect of the Company's filing, please contact Ross Carmel, Esq of Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel
LLP at 646-838-1310.

 Sincerely,

 /s/ Peter Goldstein

 Peter Goldstein

 Chief Executive Officer