SEC Company Response from BRANDPARTNERS GROUP INC (CIK 0000798600) — Dec 20, 2005
BRANDPARTNERS GROUP INC (CIK 0000798600)
Date: Dec. 20, 2005 · CIK: 0000798600 · Accession: 0001144204-05-040349
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
December
19, 2005
Securities
and Exchange Commission
450
Fifth
St., N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Attn:
Jorge Bonilla, Senior Staff Accountant
RE:
BrandPartners
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) Form 10-K for the Year Ended
December
31, 2004
Form
10-Q
for the Quarterly Periods Ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005
File
No.
00-16530
Dear
Mr.
Bonilla:
On
behalf
of the Company, we enclosed responses that correspond directly to the numbered
comments in the Commission’s letter of December 1, 2005.
Form
10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
1.
Your
response to our prior comment does not appear to address directly
or
completely our request for additional information relating to your
analysis of SFAS 131. Please address the following additional comments
relating to your conclusion that you have only one reportable
segment:
·
Please
clarify to us, using each of the specific characteristics set forth
in
paragraph 10 of FAS 131, how you determined that your Merchandising,
Creative and Design/Build business units are not operating
segments.
Response:
Our
customers are financial institutions, namely banks and credit unions. This
is
our only market at the present time. There is one set of resources within
the
Company, which are used to fulfill the needs of these customers. Our marketing
effort is directed at the financial services marketplace, not on our product
and
service offerings. A “menu” of product/service offerings is provided to our
customers to meet their needs.
To
respond to the definitions located in Paragraph 10 of FAS 131:
10.
“An
operating
segment
is
a component of an enterprise:
a.
That
engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and
incur
expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions
with
other components of the same enterprise),. .
.”
We
work with one market earning revenues and incurring expenses at a corporate
level. The Company’s product offerings use one set of resources within the
Company. The support structure is integrated in such a way that the customer
sees only the Company as a whole and not the individual
pieces.
“b.
Whose
operating results are regularly reviewed by the enterprise’s chief
operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be
allocated
to the segment and assess its performance, and. .
.”
There
is one set of resources used within the Company to support its product and
service offerings. The Company’s “chief operating decision maker” views the
structure of the Company as a single operating entity.
“c.
For
which discrete financial information is
available.”
Because
the Company has one set of resources, discrete financial information for
each of
the products and services would have to be done on an allocation basis. The
complexities of the Company’s operations are such that any such allocation would
be more arbitrary than exact, and the results would not be meaningful to
readers
of the financial statements.
·
We
note your assertion that your operating segments exhibit similar
long-term
financial performance, and therefore, are combined into one segment.
Please explain to us how your operating segments met each of the
aggregation criteria outlined in paragraph 17 of SAFAS 131. Also,
reconcile your conclusions with the disclosure on page 13 that the
business units have different business models and the apparent differences
in gross profit discussed on page 14.
Response:
The
Company’s product and service offerings are monitored to better service the
industry and to determine if the business environment has changed. In future
filings, we will adjust our terminology to more accurately reflect the
activities of the Company.
Using
the aggregation criteria in Paragraph 17:
a.
The
nature of the products and services
A
bank branch requires renovation. As part of fulfilling the customer’s needs, a
“new look” is developed which incorporates various product offerings, including
merchandising fixtures, interior design, furniture and a new graphics campaign.
Internally, similar resources are used to develop and deliver the contracted
for
products and services. The products and services are similar in that they
are
directed at a very particular type of customer with identifiable and distinct
needs. Externally, the customer has one contact with the Company and only
sees
the results.
b.
The
nature of the production process
The
Company is not a manufacturer. The Company pulls various resources together
to
provide products and services to its customers. The “production process” is
similar throughout the entire Company.
c.
The
type or class of customer for their products and
services.
The
Company deals with one type of customer - financial
institutions.
d.
The
methods used to distribute their products or provide their
services.
The
Company provides all its products and services to all of its customers on
a
contract-driven basis specific to the individual customer.
2
e.
If
applicable, the nature of the regulatory environment, for example,
banking, insurance, or public utilities.
This
is not applicable to the Company.
BrandPartners
provides a wide range of product and service offerings to the financial services
industry. This is the only market which the Company services. While the product
and service offerings do have different profit goals, they are supported
by a
single set of resources within the Company. The chief decision maker determines
how the set of resources will be allocated to those products and/or services.
In
servicing a single marketplace, the Company monitors the needs of that
marketplace through the tracking of which product/service offerings are
successful.
2.
We
note your response to our prior comment five. Please tell us the
debtors’
stock ownership in BrandPartners Group, Inc. before and after the
forgiveness of debt. Also, tell us whether the debtors had any function
with the Company subsequent to the forgiveness of
debt.
The
debtor’s stock ownership in BrandPartners Group prior to and after the
forgiveness of debt was 756,250 shares each, or a total of 1,512,500 shares.
This was less than 5% of the total stock outstanding. The debtors have had
no
function with the Company subsequent to the forgiveness of debt.
In
connection with the foregoing responses, the Company acknowledges
that:
·
It
is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
the
filings;
·
Staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do
not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filings; and
·
It
may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of
the
United States.
Should
you have any questions or would like to further discuss any of the responses
contained herein, please do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned.
Sincerely,
BRANDPARTNERS
GROUP, INC.
Suzanne
Verrill
Chief
Financial Officer
cc: Baratta
& Goldstein
3