SEC Company Response from NATIONAL TAX CREDIT INVESTORS II (CIK 0000859921) — Jul 14, 2005
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT INVESTORS II (CIK 0000859921)
Date: July 14, 2005 · CIK: 0000859921 · Accession: 0000711642-05-000312
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: April 26, 2005, June 15, 2005, June 15, 2005, May 25, 2005
Letter
Re: National Tax Credit Investors II Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 File No. 0-20610
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT INVESTORS II 55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089 Greenville, SC 29602
July 14, 2005
Correspondence Filing Via Edgar and Overnight Delivery
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Mail Stop 4561 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20549 Attn: Mr. Steven Jacobs
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter responds to the comments of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Staff") addressed to National Tax Credit Investors II, a California limited partnership (the "Partnership"), in a letter dated June 15, 2005, which was sent in response to the Partnership's June 9, 2005 response to the Staff's second comment letter dated May 25, 2005, which was sent in response to the Partnership's May 20, 2005 response to the Staff's original comment letter dated April 26, 2005. The Partnership's response to the Staff's comments are set forth below and are numbered to correspond to the numbering of the Staff's comments in the Staff's letter dated June 15, 2005.
As discussed more fully below, the Partnership determined that its evaluation of paragraph 5(c) of FIN 46R did not properly take into account the guidance in footnote 11 to FIN 46R as it applies to three local limited partnerships in which a related party is the general partner. As a result, the Partnership has determined that the three local limited partnerships are variable interest entities. This matter and the Partnership's plan to revise its disclosure in future filings are described below following the Partnership's responses to the Staff's comments.
* * * * *
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004
Financial Statements and Notes
Note 1 - Summary of Partnership Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
1. Comment: We have reviewed your response to comment 2 in our letter dated May 25, 2005. Please address the following additional items: o Tell us the name of the general partner of the local limited partnerships and if they are currently consolidating the variable interest entities. o Please provide us with a representative excerpt from the local limited partnerships agreements that discuss the fact that the general partner is prohibited from selling, assigning, transferring, mortgaging, pledging or otherwise encumbering or disposing of its interests and identifies the parties with the related consent rights.
Response: The accompanying Exhibit A provides the name of the general partner of each of the local limited partnerships and the Partnership's understanding of whether the general partner is consolidating the respective variable interest entity ("VIE"). Most of the general partners of the local limited partnerships are not affiliates of the Partnership and have not informed the Partnership of their accounting policies with respect to their investments in the local limited partnerships.
The accompanying Exhibit B provides a representative excerpt from the local limited partnership agreement for an investee of the Partnership, which excerpt describes the restriction on the general partner's ability to sell, assign, transfer, mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber or dispose of its interest in the local limited partnership.
2. Comment: In your response you list a number of indicators that you believe make the general partner the principal and the limited partner the agent. A number of the indicators related to the general partner appear to be the role of a management company. In addition, under the terms of the partnership agreement, the general partner is prohibited from selling, transferring, or encumbering its interest in the partnership without the approval of the limited partner. This also appears to indicate that the general partner is the agent. Tell us how you addressed the above factors in determining which party was the principal and agent and also discuss any kick-out rights that the limited partner possesses.
Response: Paragraph 17(b) requires consideration of "The relationship and significance of the activities of the variable interest entity to various parties within the related party group", in making the determination of which party within the related party group is most closely associated with the VIE. The rights and obligations of the general partners listed in the Partnership's response dated June 9, 2005 are detailed in Articles V and VIII of the local limited partnership agreements. These rights and obligations are granted to the general partner and not to the management company. The Partnership concluded that these rights and obligations granted to the general partners were factors that strongly indicated the general partners are the parties most closely associated with the local limited partnerships.
Under the terms of the local limited partnership agreements, the general partner is prohibited from selling, transferring or encumbering its interest in the local limited partnerships without the consent of the administrative general partner. For those local limited partnerships without an administrative general partner, this right has been eliminated.
The local limited partnership agreements provide the following with respect to "material defaults" that provide the administrative general partner with the right but not the obligation to remove the general partner and appoint itself or any of its affiliates to succeed such general partner if:
o The general partner materially violates its fiduciary responsibilities as general partner of the partnership; o The general partner is in material breach of the local limited partnership agreement or any related document for ten days after notice has been given by the administrative general partner, subject to reasonable time periods provided for the general partner to cure such breach; o The general partner willfully violates any law, regulation or order applicable to the partnership which has or may have a material adverse effect on the partnership or the apartment complex; o The general partner becomes bankrupt; o The partnership is in material breach of any project document or any other material agreement or document affecting the partnership; o The partnership at any time after rental achievement has realized cash flow of less than a designated amount; or o The partnership has had less than a designated percentage of the apartment units in the apartment complex eligible to receive tax credits, or the qualified basis of the apartment complex has been less than the basis at the close of the preceding year, or the total amount of tax credits is less than a designated amount through the compliance period.
In the event the administrative general partner does not act with respect to one of the above events occurring, the limited partner (the Partnership) has the right upon a majority vote of its limited partners, to cause the administrative general partner of the local limited partnership to remove the general partner and appoint the administrative general partner or one of its affiliates as successor general partner of the local limited partnership.
The Partnership believes that the limited partner rights to remove a general partner without cause would be a factor indicating that the general partner is the agent of the limited partner. However, the rights described above may be exercised only in the event of a breach or material default of a specific obligation. These rights are protective in nature and do not indicate that the general partner is the agent of the limited partner.
In summary, the factors noted above do not conclusively indicate which party is principal or agent in the de facto agency relationship that is deemed to exist under paragraph 16 of FIN 46R. As discussed in the Partnership's response dated June 9, 2005, the Partnership believes the general partner has characteristics commonly associated with the principal.
Revised Determination of VIEs and Planned Future Disclosure
In connection with its consideration of the Staff's comments, the Partnership has determined that it did not properly apply paragraph 5(c) of FIN 46R in determining whether certain local limited partnerships are VIEs. This misapplication involves three local limited partnerships where the general partner is a subsidiary of National Partnership Investments Corp. ("NAPICO"), the general partner of the Partnership. The Partnership previously determined that the condition in paragraph 5(c)(ii) was not met because the activities of the local limited partnership involve or are conducted on behalf of the NAPICO subsidiary, the general partner, as well as the Partnership, the limited partner with disproportionately few voting rights. This determination did not properly consider footnote 11 to paragraph 5(c) of FIN 46R, which states in part "activities that involve or are conducted on behalf of the related parties of an investor with disproportionately few voting rights shall be treated as if they involve or are conducted on behalf of that investor". We have now concluded that substantially all of the activities of the local limited partnership should have been treated as if they involve or are conducted on behalf of the Partnership. Consequently, the local limited partnerships meet both conditions in paragraph 5(c) and are VIEs.
The Partnership has considered the requirements of paragraphs 16 and 17 of FIN 46R and determined that the general partner is the member of the related party group that is most closely associated with, and therefore is the primary beneficiary of, the local limited partnerships that the Partnership now considers to be VIEs based on the Partnership's reconsideration of paragraph 5(c). Accordingly, the Partnership should not consolidate the VIEs and the basic financial statements are not affected by the Partnership's determination that the local limited partnerships are VIEs.
The Partnership will revise its disclosure of significant accounting policies in future filings to include information required by paragraph 24 of FIN 46R as it applies to the three additional local limited partnerships that were determined to be VIEs.
<PAGE>
* * * * *
As requested by the Staff in its letter dated April 26, 2005, the Partnership again acknowledges that: (a) the Partnership is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings; (b) Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and (c) the Partnership may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
If you have further questions regarding the information provided, please contact the undersigned or Stephen Waters. Mr. Waters can be reached directly at (864) 239-1554 or by fax at (864) 239-5824.
Sincerely,
/s/ David R. Robertson
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT INVESTORS II
55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
Greenville, SC 29602
July 14, 2005
Correspondence Filing Via Edgar and Overnight Delivery
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Mail Stop 4561
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attn: Mr. Steven Jacobs
Re: National Tax Credit Investors II
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 File No. 0-20610
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter responds to the comments of the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Staff") addressed to National Tax Credit Investors II, a
California limited partnership (the "Partnership"), in a letter dated June 15,
2005, which was sent in response to the Partnership's June 9, 2005 response to
the Staff's second comment letter dated May 25, 2005, which was sent in response
to the Partnership's May 20, 2005 response to the Staff's original comment
letter dated April 26, 2005. The Partnership's response to the Staff's comments
are set forth below and are numbered to correspond to the numbering of the
Staff's comments in the Staff's letter dated June 15, 2005.
As discussed more fully below, the Partnership determined that its evaluation of
paragraph 5(c) of FIN 46R did not properly take into account the guidance in
footnote 11 to FIN 46R as it applies to three local limited partnerships in
which a related party is the general partner. As a result, the Partnership has
determined that the three local limited partnerships are variable interest
entities. This matter and the Partnership's plan to revise its disclosure in
future filings are described below following the Partnership's responses to the
Staff's comments.
* * * * *
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004
Financial Statements and Notes
Note 1 - Summary of Partnership Organization and Significant Accounting
Policies
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
1. Comment: We have reviewed your response to comment 2 in our letter dated
May 25, 2005. Please address the following additional items:
o Tell us the name of the general partner of the local limited
partnerships and if they are currently consolidating the variable
interest entities.
o Please provide us with a representative excerpt from the local
limited partnerships agreements that discuss the fact that the
general partner is prohibited from selling, assigning, transferring,
mortgaging, pledging or otherwise encumbering or disposing of its
interests and identifies the parties with the related consent rights.
Response: The accompanying Exhibit A provides the name of the general
partner of each of the local limited partnerships and the Partnership's
understanding of whether the general partner is consolidating the
respective variable interest entity ("VIE"). Most of the general partners
of the local limited partnerships are not affiliates of the Partnership and
have not informed the Partnership of their accounting policies with respect
to their investments in the local limited partnerships.
The accompanying Exhibit B provides a representative excerpt from the local
limited partnership agreement for an investee of the Partnership, which
excerpt describes the restriction on the general partner's ability to sell,
assign, transfer, mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber or dispose of its
interest in the local limited partnership.
2. Comment: In your response you list a number of indicators that you
believe make the general partner the principal and the limited partner the
agent. A number of the indicators related to the general partner appear to
be the role of a management company. In addition, under the terms of the
partnership agreement, the general partner is prohibited from selling,
transferring, or encumbering its interest in the partnership without the
approval of the limited partner. This also appears to indicate that the
general partner is the agent. Tell us how you addressed the above factors
in determining which party was the principal and agent and also discuss any
kick-out rights that the limited partner possesses.
Response: Paragraph 17(b) requires consideration of "The relationship and
significance of the activities of the variable interest entity to various
parties within the related party group", in making the determination of
which party within the related party group is most closely associated with
the VIE. The rights and obligations of the general partners listed in the
Partnership's response dated June 9, 2005 are detailed in Articles V and
VIII of the local limited partnership agreements. These rights and
obligations are granted to the general partner and not to the management
company. The Partnership concluded that these rights and obligations
granted to the general partners were factors that strongly indicated the
general partners are the parties most closely associated with the local
limited partnerships.
Under the terms of the local limited partnership agreements, the general
partner is prohibited from selling, transferring or encumbering its
interest in the local limited partnerships without the consent of the
administrative general partner. For those local limited partnerships
without an administrative general partner, this right has been eliminated.
The local limited partnership agreements provide the following with respect
to "material defaults" that provide the administrative general partner with
the right but not the obligation to remove the general partner and appoint
itself or any of its affiliates to succeed such general partner if:
o The general partner materially violates its fiduciary responsibilities
as general partner of the partnership;
o The general partner is in material breach of the local limited
partnership agreement or any related document for ten days after notice
has been given by the administrative general partner, subject to
reasonable time periods provided for the general partner to cure such
breach;
o The general partner willfully violates any law, regulation or order
applicable to the partnership which has or may have a material adverse
effect on the partnership or the apartment complex;
o The general partner becomes bankrupt;
o The partnership is in material breach of any project document or any
other material agreement or document affecting the partnership;
o The partnership at any time after rental achievement has realized cash
flow of less than a designated amount; or
o The partnership has had less than a designated percentage of the
apartment units in the apartment complex eligible to receive tax
credits, or the qualified basis of the apartment complex has been less
than the basis at the close of the preceding year, or the total amount
of tax credits is less than a designated amount through the compliance
period.
In the event the administrative general partner does not act with respect
to one of the above events occurring, the limited partner (the Partnership)
has the right upon a majority vote of its limited partners, to cause the
administrative general partner of the local limited partnership to remove
the general partner and appoint the administrative general partner or one
of its affiliates as successor general partner of the local limited
partnership.
The Partnership believes that the limited partner rights to remove a
general partner without cause would be a factor indicating that the general
partner is the agent of the limited partner. However, the rights described
above may be exercised only in the event of a breach or material default of
a specific obligation. These rights are protective in nature and do not
indicate that the general partner is the agent of the limited partner.
In summary, the factors noted above do not conclusively indicate which
party is principal or agent in the de facto agency relationship that is
deemed to exist under paragraph 16 of FIN 46R. As discussed in the
Partnership's response dated June 9, 2005, the Partnership believes the
general partner has characteristics commonly associated with the principal.
Revised Determination of VIEs and Planned Future Disclosure
In connection with its consideration of the Staff's comments, the Partnership
has determined that it did not properly apply paragraph 5(c) of FIN 46R in
determining whether certain local limited partnerships are VIEs. This
misapplication involves three local limited partnerships where the general
partner is a subsidiary of National Partnership Investments Corp. ("NAPICO"),
the general partner of the Partnership. The Partnership previously determined
that the condition in paragraph 5(c)(ii) was not met because the activities of
the local limited partnership involve or are conducted on behalf of the NAPICO
subsidiary, the general partner, as well as the Partnership, the limited
partner with disproportionately few voting rights. This determination did not
properly consider footnote 11 to paragraph 5(c) of FIN 46R, which states in
part "activities that involve or are conducted on behalf of the related
parties of an investor with disproportionately few voting rights shall be
treated as if they involve or are conducted on behalf of that investor". We
have now concluded that substantially all of the activities of the local
limited partnership should have been treated as if they involve or are
conducted on behalf of the Partnership. Consequently, the local limited
partnerships meet both conditions in paragraph 5(c) and are VIEs.
The Partnership has considered the requirements of paragraphs 16 and 17 of FIN
46R and determined that the general partner is the member of the related party
group that is most closely associated with, and therefore is the primary
beneficiary of, the local limited partnerships that the Partnership now
considers to be VIEs based on the Partnership's reconsideration of paragraph
5(c). Accordingly, the Partnership should not consolidate the VIEs and the
basic financial statements are not affected by the Partnership's determination
that the local limited partnerships are VIEs.
The Partnership will revise its disclosure of significant accounting policies
in future filings to include information required by paragraph 24 of FIN 46R
as it applies to the three additional local limited partnerships that were
determined to be VIEs.
<PAGE>
* * * * *
As requested by the Staff in its letter dated April 26, 2005, the Partnership
again acknowledges that: (a) the Partnership is responsible for the adequacy
and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings; (b) Staff comments or changes
to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission
from taking any action with respect to the filings; and (c) the Partnership
may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the
Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United
States.
If you have further questions regarding the information provided, please
contact the undersigned or Stephen Waters. Mr. Waters can be reached directly
at (864) 239-1554 or by fax at (864) 239-5824.
Sincerely,
/s/ David R. Robertson
David R. Robertson
President and Chief Executive Officer
National Partnership Investments Corp.,
the general partner of National Tax
Credit Investors II
<PAGE>
Exhibit A - Schedule of General Partners of the Local Limited Partnerships
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GP an GP
AIMCO
Registrant Local Limited Partnership General Partner (GP) (1) Affiliate Consolidating
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NTCI II Asheville Equity, LP NTC, Inc. Yes No
NTCI II Countryside North American Howell Countryside, Inc. No Unknown
Partners, LP
NTCI II Edgewood, LP Edgewood Mgt Company, Inc. No Unknown
NTCI II Fourth Street Apartment Advanced Development & No Unknown
Investors Investment, Inc.
NTCI II Germantown, LP Germantown Mgt. Company, No Unknown
Inc.
NTCI II Jefferson Meadows Limited T. Runquist, Detroit No Unknown
Dividend Housing Association, Renaissance & First Centrum
LP
NTCI II Kentucky River Apartments, Ltd M. Meade, R. Myers, D. No Unknown
Meade, W. Davis and P. Lewi
NTCI II Wynnefield Lincoln Grove LP Crosland Housing No Unknown
NTCI II Meadowlake, LP Meadown Lake I Mgt. Company No Unknown
NTCI II Michigan Beach, LP MB Apartments L.P. Yes No
NTCI II Oak View Spartanburg, LP The Oak View Company No Unknown
NTCI II Pampa Partnership Limited Diversified Housing
Services, Inc.
NTCI II Huntsville Properties, LP A. Alexander, A. Snow & No Unknown
Sanbury Corp.
NTCI II Northwestern Partners, Ltd. Northwestern Partners & J. No Unknown
Reeves
NTCI II Quivera Place Associates, LP Quivera Management, Inc. Yes No
NTCI II Salem Park, LP Salem Park Mgt. Company No Unknown
NTCI II Virginia Park Meadows Limited T. Runquist, First Centrum No Unknown
Dividend Housing Association, & C. Young
LP
</TABLE>
(1) General Partner of the Local Limited Partnership
<PAGE>
Exhibit B - Representative Local Limited Partnership Agreement Excerpt
Oak View Spartanburg, LP (Administrative General Partner exists)
11.1 Withdrawal.
A. The Operating General Partner may not Withdraw (other than an Involuntary
Withdrawal) from the Partnership or Assign, pledge or encumber all or any
part of its Interest without the Consent of the Administrative General
Partner, and, to the extent required, of each Authority and each Lender.
The consent of the Limited Partner shall not be required.
Definitions.
"Assignment" means a valid sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of all
or any portion of an Interest. "Assign