SEC Company Response from ALTAIR NANOTECHNOLOGIES INC (CIK 0001016546) — Sep 19, 2005
ALTAIR NANOTECHNOLOGIES INC (CIK 0001016546)
Date: Sept. 19, 2005 · CIK: 0001016546 · Accession: 0001019687-05-002622
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Altair Correspondence
September
19, 2005
SENT
VIA
FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr.
Rufus
Decker
Accounting
Branch Chief
Division
of Corporation Finance
Mail
Stop
0510
100
F
Street, Northeast
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C. 20549-0510
Dear
Mr.
Decker,
As
outside U.S. securities counsel for Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, “Altair” or the “Company”), we are
writing in response to your letter to Altair dated August 30, 2005 (your
“Letter”). Each of our responses is based solely on information we have been
provided by Altair. For clarity, each of our responses is preceded by a bolded
restatement of your request.
Form
10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005
Note
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page 7
Revenue
Recognition, page 9
Mr.
Rufus
Decker
September
19, 2005
Page
2
1.
We
have reviewed your response to comment two. You state that your
participation on the development committee is not an obligation to
perform
a service for Spectrum, but rather represents a right to monitor
the
status of development. However, section 3.1 of the license agreement
appears to obligate you to participate in a “Joint Development Committee.”
Further, the responsibilities of the committee are to “manage and oversee
the pre-clinical development of Compounds and Products…” The agreement
sets forth a process requiring unanimous support on the committee
for
development decisions and procedures for resoling disputes. This
appears
to represent more than an option to monitor development status. It
appears
that you are obligated to actively participate in the decision-making
process, at least during the pre-clinical phase of
development.
This
interpretation appears to be reinforced by your separate obligation, detailed
in
section 3.2(a) - Responsibilities of Altair, to “use commercially reasonable
efforts to assist Spectrum in the pre-clinical development of products and
compounds…” Despite the requirement that Spectrum reimburse you for costs
incurred in carrying out this obligation, it appears that Spectrum has secured
an ongoing right to your services. It is unclear why this right would be secured
in the license agreement if Spectrum attributes no value to
it.
Accordingly,
it appears to us that your continuing obligation under the licensing agreement
is an important element of the arrangement and that the earnings process is
completed by your performance under the terms of the arrangement, not simply
by
its origination. Please amend your Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March
31
and June 30, 2005 to defer the revenue related to the license agreement, or
provide us with additional information to help us understand why you believe
no
amendments are necessary.
Response:
Using revenue recognition guidelines established by SAB Topic 13:A1, the Company
has analyzed the fact situation regarding License Agreement dated January 28,
2005 (the “License Agreement”) with Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Spectrum”).
In particular, the Company focused on Topic 13:A.3(f) in relation to Altair’s
continuing obligations under the License Agreement and the extent to which
the
earnings process is substantially complete.
Spectrum’s
Rights are Separable
Altair
owns patents, trademarks, know-how and trade secrets related to certain chemical
compounds, generally called RenaZorb. The License Agreement grants to Spectrum
an exclusive worldwide license to use, sell, import, make and manufacture
RenaZorb for human therapeutic and diagnostic uses. In return, Spectrum has
agreed to make upfront, milestone and royalty payments as described in Article
6
of the License Agreement. Article 6.1 of the License
Agreement specifically addresses both Upfront and Milestone Payments, and
Article 6.1 (a) clearly states that upfront and milestone payments are
consideration for the right to enter into the licensing agreement, and the
use
of Altair’s patents, trademarks, know-how and trade secrets related to RenaZorb.
It should be noted that the Company has spent several years researching and
developing RenaZorb. The compound has been tested in live animal studies and
shown to be effective for the intended purposes.
Mr.
Rufus
Decker
September
19, 2005
Page
3
Altair’s
participation in the further development is not essential to the functionality
of the product. Spectrum has the expertise necessary to complete development
and
obtain FDA approval for the product and take product to market. Altair does
not,
that is the reason, the Company licensed RenaZorb.
Altair
Participation on Joint Development Committee
Altair
has invested significant corporate resources in RenaZorb. Because the license
is
exclusive, it is critical that Spectrum’s development effort is successful.
Furthermore, Altair may earn $9 to $14 million in additional milestone payments
during the development period, an important potential revenue source. Article
3.1 related to the Joint Development Committee (“JDC”) was inserted into the
License Agreement at the insistence of Altair, not Spectrum, to maximize the
probability that the licensed technology will be successfully developed. Our
reasons for viewing the JDC as desirable are twofold. First, Spectrum has the
sole right of development but is required to deliver to the JDC a development
plan. The development plan allows Altair to monitor the progress of development
in relation to Spectrum’s diligence obligations contained in Article 3.5.
Second, the JDC provides Altair with a forum to make recommendations for
improving the development plan. Ultimately, under Article 3.2 (b), Spectrum
has
sole responsibility for development and commercialization of RenaZorb. Under
Article 3.1 (d), Spectrum also has sole authority to resolve JDC matters. It
is
important to note that Spectrum’s authority in resolution of JDC matters is
absolute, Spectrum is not even required to act “reasonably.” Thus, to a large
degree the JDC’s authority is illusory.
In
addition, the JDC’s authority is limited to pre-clinical compound and product
development matters only. The current development plan anticipates the
pre-clinical period will end during the first quarter of 2006; thus, the Company
is slightly more than half through the period.
Altair’s
Responsibility for Development
Article
3.2 (b) clearly establishes Spectrum’s responsibility for all development
activities. Altair assistance may be requested by Spectrum, but only during
the
preclinical period, and Altair’s obligation is only a reasonable efforts
obligation (Article 3.2 (a)). The current development plan anticipates the
pre-clinical period will end during the first quarter of 2006. To date, Spectrum
has requested no development assistance from Altair.
Their
License Agreement does not establish a price for services provided by Altair
to
Spectrum. Should Spectrum request Altair assistance, any services provided
would
be provided at a fair value, as negotiated by the parties. Altair’s obligation
to provide services at Spectrum’s request did not affect the up-front payment
value. Transaction examples contained in SAB Topic 13:A.3(f) are not analogous
because any on-going development activities requested by Spectrum will be
separate from the core grant of rights set forth in the License Agreement and
will not provided at a discount to market value.
Mr.
Rufus
Decker
September
19, 2005
Page
4
Conclusion
Based
on
the preceding analysis, the Company believes that revenue from the License
Agreement has been fully earned and properly recognized. The License Agreement
grants Spectrum all rights it needs to develop and market RenaZorb, separate
from any obligation of Altair to provide services. Altair’s continuing
participation obligations under the License Agreement, such its participation
on
the JDC, are not critical to Spectrum’s development of Renazorb. To the extent
Altair does provide additional services to Spectrum, the services will be of
a
nature that they could be provided by other companies, and Altair will be
compensated at fair value. In short, neither Spectrum’s decision to pay an
up-front fee nor the amount of that fee was affected by Altair’s continuing
obligations and rights.
If
you
have any questions regarding the foregoing, feel free to call me at the number
set forth below or Edward Dickinson, Chief Financial Officer of Altair at (775)
858-3750.
Sincerely,
/s/
Bryan Allen
Bryan T. Allen
As
the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, I confirm that the Company’s agreement
with, and authorization of, the statements in this letter.
Altair
Nanotechnologies, Inc.
/s/
Edward Dickinson
Edward Dickinson, Chief
Financial
Officer