SEC Comment Letter for SLS INTERNATIONAL INC (CIK 0001121785) — Nov 22, 2005
SLS INTERNATIONAL INC (CIK 0001121785)
Date: Nov. 22, 2005 · CIK: 0001121785 · Accession: 0000000000-05-059020
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: July 26, 2005, July 13, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Mail Stop 3561
November 7, 2005
Via U.S. Mail and Fax (417-883-2723)
Mr. Michael L. Maples
Chief Financial Officer
SLS International, Inc.
1650 W. Jackson Street
Ozark, Missouri 65721
Re: SLS International, Inc.
Form 10-KSB for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Filed March 28, 2005
Forms 10-Q for Fiscal Quarters Ended March 31, 2005 and June 30,
2005
File No. 1-31323
Dear Mr. Maples:
We have reviewed your supplemental response letter dated
July
26, 2005 as well as your filings and have the following comments.
As
noted in our comment letter dated July 13, 2005, we have limited
our
review to your financial statements and related disclosures and do
not intend to expand our review to other portions of your
documents.
Form 10-Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2005
Note 3 - Stock Transactions, page 7
1. In connection with your issuance of Series C Preferred Stock,
we
note the issuance of Class D warrants which allow the holder to
purchase up to 400 shares of the company`s common stock. The
Registration Rights Agreement, filed on January 6, 2005 as exhibit
10.4 to Form 8-K requires you to file a registration statement
that
is declared effective by the SEC and to keep the registration
statement continuously effective for a preset time period, or else
you are required to pay, in cash, a liquidated damages payment
according to the terms included in Section 2(b) of the
Registration
Rights Agreement. These damages require 1.0% to 2.0% cash
payments
based upon the elapsed time from the date of the Registration
Rights
Agreement to compensate investors for the delay or reduction of
their
ability to sell the Registrable Securities.
Under paragraph 16 of EITF 00-19, if a settlement alternative
includes a penalty that would be avoided by a company under other
settlement alternatives; the uneconomic settlement alternative
should
be disregarded in the classification of the contract. It appears
to
us that the significant amount of liquidated damages that you may
be
obligated to pay should be considered a penalty, as that term is
defined in paragraph 16 of EITF 00-19, requiring you to classify
the
warrants as a liability, initially measured at fair value, with
subsequent changes in fair value reported in earnings as long as
the
warrants remain classified as liabilities. Please revise or
advise
in detail.
* * * *
Please respond to these comments within 10 business days or
tell us when you will provide us with a response. You may contact
Dave Walz, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3358 or Carlos Pacho,
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant, at (202) 551-3835 if you have
questions regarding comments on the financial statements and
related
matters. Please contact me at (202) 551-3810 if you have any
other
questions.
Sincerely,
Larry Spirgel
Assistant Director
??
??
??
??
Mr. Michael L. Maples
SLS International, Inc.
November 7, 2005
Page 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>