SEC Company Response from E & S HOLDINGS INC (CIK 0001161135) — Mar 9, 2005
E & S HOLDINGS INC (CIK 0001161135)
Date: March 9, 2005 · CIK: 0001161135 · Accession: 0001165527-05-000050
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-50101
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
E & S Holdings, Inc.
5046 East Boulevard NW
Canton, Ohio 44718
Phone/Fax: 330-966-8120
Toll Free: 1-866-966-8120
www.portablepipevice.com
March 8, 2005
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Attn: Patricia Armelin, Staff Accountant
450 5th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549
Re: E & S Holdings, Inc.
Form 10KSB for the year ending May 31, 2004
Form 10QSB for the period ended November 30, 2004
File No.: 000-50101
Dear Ms. Armelin:
Please consider this communication as supplemental information in response to
the Commission's letter of February 28, 2005. In response to your comments, I
can advise you as follows.
FORM 10KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDING MAY 31, 2004
EXHIBITS 31.1 AND EXHIBIT 31.2
1. It is noted that there is an inconsistency with respect to the language
in the certification in that it does not comply with the requirements set forth
in Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 601(31) of Regulation
SB. Please be advised that the certification as set forth in your letter will be
utilized in all subsequent annual reports.
FORM 10QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2004
NOTE C - FORGIVENESS OF DEBT, PAGE 5
2. In determining the proper treatment of the transaction, we referred to
APB 26, Extinguishment of Debt, and SFAS 145 which eliminated the former
requirement that gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be presented
as extraordinary items. Since the company is in the development stage,
professional standards required the presentation of results of operations from
<PAGE>
inception. As a result of the forgiveness of the liabilities, the Company
believes that the reduction of the related gross expenses more accurately
presents the true results of the Company's operations.
In addition, consideration was given to footnote 1 of paragraph 20 of APB 26.
The Company is of the opinion that rather than treating the forgiveness as a
capital transaction, the reversal of the expenses more fairly reflects the true
economic activity of the company. No additional right was received by the
parties on the forgiveness of these expenses. Therefore, in essence, the
forgiveness represents the reversal of an over accrual of prior expenses, giving
rise to its treatment as income.
On behalf of the Company, it is acknowledged that the Company is responsible for
the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings. It is further
acknowledged that staff comments or changes to disclosures in response to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to
the filing and, the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.
Please contact me if you have any further comments with regard to the company's
response to your above referred to communication.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Edward A. Barth
-----------------------------
Edward A. Barth,
Principal Executive and Financial Officer
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>