SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (CIK 0001175215) — Sep 1, 2005

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (CIK 0001175215)
Date: Sept. 1, 2005 · CIK: 0001175215 · Accession: 0000000000-05-045637

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 333-92214

Date
September 1, 2005
Author
??
Form
UPLOAD
Company
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (CIK 0001175215)

Letter

Securities and Exchange Commission Mail Stop 3561 CF/AD11 100 F St. NE Washington, DC 20549-3561 September 1, 2005 Mr. Dennis F. Strigl President and Chief Executive Officer Cellco Partnership 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, NJ 07921

Re: Cellco Partnership Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 Filed March 14, 2005 File No. 333-92214

Dear Mr. Strigl:

We have reviewed your filing and have the following comments. We have limited our review to only your financial statements and related disclosures and do not intend to expand our review to other portions of your documents. Please address the following comments in future filings. If you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a future revision is unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your explanation. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional comments.

Please understand that the purpose of our review process is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

Form 10-K Financial Statements

1. Refer to the penultimate paragraph of page 90, where you disclose your plan to consolidate Vista PCS, LLC even though it is controlled by Valley Communications, LLC. In future filings please expand your consolidation policy disclosure to fully address circumstances such as this and explain to us the nature of your investment in Vista PCS, LLC and the basis for your accounting in GAAP. Refer us to the accounting literature that you are relying upon as a basis for your policy and describe to us how you apply the guidance of FIN 46R to this and other similar investments.

2. We note on page 5 of the March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q of Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Communications recognized a material gain upon the adoption of SFAS 143. Please explain to us the facts and circumstances of your adoption of SFAS 143, including the impact of adoption on your financial position and results of operations. Tell us how you determined your asset retirement obligation (ARO) and cumulative effect adjustment, if any. Also, explain what impact the adoption of FIN #47 had on your methodology for estimating your ARO.

June 30, 2005 Form 10-Q Wireless licenses and Other Intangibles, Net, page 5

3. Please explain to us how you applied the guidance in EITF Topic D- 108. Describe in detail how you applied the direct method of valuing your wireless licenses. Please address the following questions in your response. * Did you determine the direct value of these licenses on a license- by-license basis or did you aggregate some or all of these licenses? If you aggregated licenses, tell us how. * The sixth paragraph of page 4 of your Form 10-K seems to indicate that you have purchased overlapping licenses. Tell us how the values of your older and newer licenses compare in such circumstances. * Also, describe how the direct values were determined and tell us how they compared to the recorded values as originally determined under the residual method.

* * * *

Please respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please furnish a letter that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested information. Detailed letters greatly facilitate our review. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes all information required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that they have provided all information investors require for an informed investment decision. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company`s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

In connection with responding to our comments, please provide, in writing, a statement from the company acknowledging that:

* the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings;

* staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and

* the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

In addition, please be advised that the Division of Enforcement has access to all information you provide to the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance in our review of your filings or in response to our comments on your filings.

You may contact Joseph M. Kempf, Senior Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3352 or Robert S. Littlepage, Accountant Branch Chief, at (202) 551-3361 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact me at (202) 551-3810 with any other questions.

Sincerely,
Larry Spirgel
Assistant Director
??

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 3561
CF/AD11
100 F St. NE
Washington, DC 20549-3561

									September 1, 2005

Mr. Dennis F. Strigl
President and Chief Executive Officer
Cellco Partnership
180 Washington Valley Road
Bedminster, NJ 07921

	Re:	Cellco Partnership
      Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
      Filed March 14, 2005
		File No. 333-92214

Dear Mr. Strigl:

      We have reviewed your filing and have the following
comments.
We have limited our review to only your financial statements and
related disclosures and do not intend to expand our review to
other
portions of your documents.  Please address the following comments
in
future filings.  If you disagree, we will consider your
explanation
as to why our comment is inapplicable or a future revision is
unnecessary.  Please be as detailed as necessary in your
explanation.
In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with
information so we may better understand your disclosure.  After
reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional
comments.

	Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We look forward to working with you in these respects.  We welcome
any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect
of
our review.  Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed
at
the end of this letter.

Form 10-K
Financial Statements

1. Refer to the penultimate paragraph of page 90, where you
disclose
your plan to consolidate Vista PCS, LLC even though it is
controlled
by Valley Communications, LLC.  In future filings please expand
your
consolidation policy disclosure to fully address circumstances
such
as this and explain to us the nature of your investment in Vista
PCS,
LLC and the basis for your accounting in GAAP.  Refer us to the
accounting literature that you are relying upon as a basis for
your
policy and describe to us how you apply the guidance of FIN 46R to
this and other similar investments.

2. We note on page 5 of the March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q of Verizon
Communications, Inc., Verizon Communications recognized a material
gain upon the adoption of SFAS 143.  Please explain to us the
facts
and circumstances of your adoption of SFAS 143, including the
impact
of adoption on your financial position and results of operations.
Tell us how you determined your asset retirement obligation (ARO)
and
cumulative effect adjustment, if any.  Also, explain what impact
the
adoption of FIN #47 had on your methodology for estimating your
ARO.

June 30, 2005 Form 10-Q
Wireless licenses and Other Intangibles, Net, page 5

3. Please explain to us how you applied the guidance in EITF Topic
D-
108.  Describe in detail how you applied the direct method of
valuing
your wireless licenses.  Please address the following questions in
your response.
* Did you determine the direct value of these licenses on a
license-
by-license basis or did you aggregate some or all of these
licenses?
If you aggregated licenses, tell us how.
* The sixth paragraph of page 4 of your Form 10-K seems to
indicate
that you have purchased overlapping licenses.  Tell us how the
values
of your older and newer licenses compare in such circumstances.
* Also, describe how the direct values were determined and tell us
how they compared to the recorded values as originally determined
under the residual method.

*    *    *    *

      Please respond to these comments within 10 business days or
tell us when you will provide us with a response.  Please furnish
a
letter that keys your responses to our comments and provides any
requested information.  Detailed letters greatly facilitate our
review.  Please understand that we may have additional comments
after
reviewing your responses to our comments.

	We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and
adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the
filing includes all information required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that they have provided all information
investors require for an informed investment decision.  Since the
company and its management are in possession of all facts relating
to
a company`s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and
adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

	In connection with responding to our comments, please
provide,
in writing, a statement from the company acknowledging that:

* the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in the filings;

* staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
with
respect to the filings; and

* the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.

      In addition, please be advised that the Division of
Enforcement
has access to all information you provide to the staff of the
Division of Corporation Finance in our review of your filings or
in
response to our comments on your filings.

      You may contact Joseph M. Kempf, Senior Staff Accountant, at
(202) 551-3352 or Robert S. Littlepage, Accountant Branch Chief,
at
(202) 551-3361 if you have questions regarding comments on the
financial statements and related matters.  Please contact me at
(202)
551-3810 with any other questions.

								Sincerely,

								Larry Spirgel
								Assistant Director
??

??

??

??

Mr. Dennis F. Strigl
President and Chief Executive Officer
Cellco Partnership
September 1, 2005
Page 3

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>