SEC Comment Letter for Opus Genetics, Inc. (IRD) (CIK 0001228627) (IRD) — Sep 17, 2010
Opus Genetics, Inc. (IRD) (CIK 0001228627)
Date: Sept. 17, 2010 · CIK: 0001228627 · Accession: 0000000000-10-054526
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-34079
Show Raw Text
September 17, 2010 Dr. Chang Ahn Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455 Rockville, MD 20850 Re: Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 Schedule 14A filed April 26, 2010 File No. 001-34079 Dear Dr. Ahn: We have reviewed your filings and have th e following comments. In our comments, we ask you to provide us with information so we may better underst and your disclosure. Please respond to this letter within te n business days by providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe a comment applies to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response. Please furnish us a letter on EDGAR under the fo rm type label CORRESP that keys your responses to our comment. After reviewing the information provided, we may have additional comments and/or request that you amend your filing. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 Intellectual Property, page 18 1. Please provide proposed disclo sure to be incl uded in your Form 10-K for 2010 which includes the following information with re gard to your intellectual property: • The number of material patents that you own; • The number of material patents that you have licensed; • The jurisdictions in which your material patents have been granted; and • The indication or product candidate to which each of your material patents relate. Collaboration and License Arrangements, page 18 2. Please provide proposed disclo sure to be incl uded in your Form 10-K for 2010 which includes the material terms of each of your material collaboration and license arrangements. In particular, for your licen se agreement with Revaax Pharmaceuticals LLC in relation to the licensing and de velopment of certain compounds including Dr. Chang Ahn Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. September 17, 2010 Page 2 Serdaxin and Zoraxel, please provide proposed disclosure which includes the following information: • Initial license fee; • Range of royalties (within a ten-percent range); and • Aggregate potential milestone payments; For your collaborative research agreement w ith Rexgene Biotech Co., Ltd. in relation to the development of Archexin, please provi de proposed disclosure which includes the termination provisions of the agreement. Research and Development Projects, page 37 3. Please provide us proposed disclosure to be incl uded in future filings of the research and development expenses incurred during each period presented by product. Signatures, page 52 4. We note that your Form 10-K does not appear to have been signed by an individual identified as your controller or principal accounting officer. If an individual who has already signed your Form 10-K serves in this capacity, please advise us of this fact and confirm that your next Form 10-K will includ e this additional capaci ty in the signature block for this individual. If your principal accounting officer or controller has not signed your Form 10-K, your filing will need to be amended to include the signature of this individual as required u nder General Instruction D to Form 10-K. Financial Statements Notes to the Financial Statements 9. Common Stock, page F-15 5. It appears, based on your filed exhibits, th at the Securities Purchase Agreements and warrant agreements for your Decembe r 18, 2007 and March 20, 2008 unit offerings provide for anti-dilution protection whereby ad ditional shares and warrants, at a reduced exercise price, are issued if you issue equity instrument s at prices lower than the individual unit offering prices. Pl ease address the following comments: • Please explain to us why these anti-diluti on make-whole provisions associated with the common stock portion of these unit o fferings are not liabi lities under ASC Topic 480. • Please explain to us why these anti-diluti on provisions associat ed with the common stock warrants were not reclassified to li abilities on January 1, 2009 with the adoption of the new guidance starting at ASC 815-40-15-5. In this regard, it appears that the Subsequent Equity Sales provision in Secti ons 9d of these warra nt agreements is similar to Example 9 at ASC 815-40-55-33 and 55-34. Dr. Chang Ahn Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. September 17, 2010 Page 3 6. It appears that the warrants issued in c onjunction with your May 19, 2009 and October 19, 2009 unit offerings were made pursuant to shelf registration statements. It also appears that the June 30, 2010 unit offering identified in your June 30, 2010 Form 10-Q was also issued pursuant to a shelf registra tion statement. Please provide us proposed disclosure to include in your future filings to clarify the operation of the anti-dilution protection provisions associated with the warran ts in these units. In this regard, please address the following, as applicable , in your proposed disclosure: • Clarify how the provisions are structured to protect a holder’s position from being diluted based on a mathematical calculation; • Describe the inputs and how th ese inputs are used in the mathematical calculation of the provision; • Clarify whether the protection also applies to the common stock issued in the units; and • Confirm separately for us that these unit o fferings do not have the same provisions as your December 18, 2007 and March 20, 2008 unit whereby additional shares and warrants are issued if you issue equity instru ments at prices lower than the individual unit offering prices. Exhibits 31. Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) 7. Please provide us proposed disclosure to incl ude in your future filings to revise your certifications to be presented exactly as stipul ated in Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K. In this regard, please remove the titles of your certifying of ficers and the name of your company from the introductory sentence. In addition, please change the rule reference for these exhibits in the E xhibit Index. You reference Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) when the appropriate Rules are 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a). The former rules define disclosure controls and pro cedures, the latter rules set the requirements for filing the certifications. Schedule Def 14A filed April 26, 2010 Executive Compensation and Other Matters, page 20 Summary Compensation Table, page 20 8. We note that the value of the option award gran ted to Mr. Soni in 2008 as reflected in the 2009 Summary Compensation Table is the same as the value for the option award as reflected in your 2008 Summary Compensation Table. As su ch, it appears that the 2009 Summary Compensation Table has not been re vised to properly valu e the option awards granted to named executive officers in acco rdance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Please advise. If the option awards have not been valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, your Form 10-K will need to be amended to revise your 2009 Summary Compensation Table accordingly. Dr. Chang Ahn Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. September 17, 2010 Page 4 We urge all persons who are responsible for th e accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing include s the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules requir e. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made. In responding to our comments, please provi de a written statement from the company acknowledging that: • the company is responsible for the adequacy an d accuracy of the disclo sure in the filing; • staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and • the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federa l securities laws of the United States. Please contact Kei Nakada, Staff Accountan t, at (202) 551-3659 or Mark Brunhofer, Senior Staff Accountant, at ( 202) 551-3638 if you have questions regarding the processing of your response as well as any questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. You may contact Bryan Pitko, Staff Attorney at (202) 551-3203 with questions on any of the other comments. In this regard, do not hesitate to cont act me, at (202) 551-3679. Sincerely, Jim B. Rosenberg Senior Assistant Chief Accountant