SEC Company Response from World Monitor Trust III (CIK 0001305201) — Jan 5, 2005
World Monitor Trust III (CIK 0001305201)
Date: Jan. 5, 2005 · CIK: 0001305201 · Accession: 0000905148-05-000038
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-119612
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP
BEIJING 787 SEVENTH AVENUE LOS ANGELES
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
BRUSSELS TELEPHONE 212 839 5300 NEW YORK
FACSIMILE 212 839 5599
CHICAGO www.sidley.com SAN FRANCISCO
DALLAS FOUNDED 1866 SHANGHAI
GENEVA SINGAPORE
HONG KONG TOKYO
LONDON WASHINGTON, D.C.
WRITER'S DIRECT NUMBER WRITER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS
(212) 839-5458 mschmidtberger@sidley.com
December 30, 2004
Owen Pinkerton, Esq., Senior Attorney
United States Securities and Exchange
Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: World Monitor Trust III
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement,
filed on December 30, 2005, File No.333-119612
--------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mr. Pinkerton:
Thank you for your comment letter of November 10, 2004 to Marc
Goodman at Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. regarding the captioned
registration statement for World Monitor Trust III (the "Company") This letter
is to respond on behalf of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. to the
questions and comments you raised. Each of your numbered questions and
comments is set forth below in italics, with our response immediately
following.
General
1. Please revise your document significantly to bring it within the
guidelines of Plain English. We note, for example, that your cover
page is greater than one page in length, that you have defined terms
throughout your document, and that you have embedded lists in
various places. Please see Items 421(b) and (d) of Regulation C, as
well as Staff Legal Bulletin 7A.
Response:
We have made substantial revisions in response to the foregoing
comment.
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROwN & WOOD LLP IS A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
PRACTICING IN AFFILIATION WITH OTHER SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD PARTNERSHIPS
<PAGE>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP NEW YORK
Owen Pinkerton, Esq., Senior Attorney
November 18, 2004
Page 2
2. In connection with the above comment, it is not clear why you refer
to World Monitor Trust III as the "Fund" since such term is not part
of the pool's name, nor is the pool a mutual fund registered under
the Investment Company Act of 1940. Please revise to refer to the
pool by its name or a variation of its name.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment.
3. Please revise throughout the prospectus to provide disclosure
substantially similar to the disclosures that would be required by
Industry Guide 5 if real estate limited partnership units were being
registered. For example, your revisions should include disclosure of
the fees and expenses payable to the managing owner and its
affiliates in the tabular format contemplated by Item 4 of Guide 5,
together with estimates of the total amount of each fee and expense
to the extent reasonably practicable, a narrative discussion under
an appropriate major heading of the managing owner and its
affiliates' experience over the past ten years similar to that
required by Item 8.A of Guide 5, which includes such information as
a description of any major adverse business developments and
conditions that were experienced.
Response:
Applicable rules and regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (the "CFTC"), the National Futures Association (the "NFA") and the
National Association of Securities Administrators Association (the "NASAA")
address disclosure issues and practices similar to those set forth in Industry
Guide 5 generally and in Items 4 and 8.A of Industry Guide 5 in particular
(although without perfect congruity) and set forth the appropriate standards
and practices applicable to publicly offered managed pools of futures and
options on futures. We believe we are in substantial compliance with such
rules and regulations and with common and accepted best practices in the
managed futures industry, although we have received comments from the NFA and
various state securities administrators to which we have responded or are in
the process of responding. In certain instances, the rules and regulations of
the CFTC, the NFA and the NASAA conflict with the requirements of Industry
Guide 5. We respectfully submit that in the event of such a conflict, the
rules and regulations of the CFTC, NFA and NASAA should control, as they were
written specifically for the managed futures industry and publicly offered
commodity pools, each of which are substantially regulated by such
authorities. In our experience, the staff of the division of corporate finance
historically has afforded substantial deference to the rules and
<PAGE>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP NEW YORK
Owen Pinkerton, Esq., Senior Attorney
November 18, 2004
Page 3
regulations of the CFTC, the NFA and the NASAA in respect of the standards of
disclosure applicable to public commodity pools.
4. Please provide us with a complete copy of any sales material which
includes all illustrations and other inserts in the form you expect
to distribute to investors in accordance with Release No. 33-6900
and by analogy to Item 19D of Guide 5. We may have further comment
after we receive your materials.
Response:
We will provide such materials under separate cover as they become
available.
5. Please provide a Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section
within the registration statement prepared in accordance with Item
303 of Regulations S-K and specifically include the disclosures
related to the following: 1) liquidity and capital resources, 2)
off-balance sheet arrangements, and 3) a tabular disclosure of
contractual obligations. Refer to FR-72 for the Commission's
guidance regarding management discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment. See
page 26.
6. In addition; please provide a discussion of what you expect to be
your most critical accounting policies, which should include what
you believe to be your most difficult and judgmental estimates, the
most important and pervasive accounting policies used, and the areas
most sensitive to material change from external factors. Refer to
FR-60.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment. See
page 26.
<PAGE>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP NEW YORK
Owen Pinkerton, Esq., Senior Attorney
November 18, 2004
Page 4
7. Please supplementally confirm to us, if true, that all units
redeemed or otherwise re-acquired by the trust will not be re-issued
to other investors. If you do intend to re-issue redeemed or
re-acquired units, please tell us supplementally how you intend to
register those re-issuances under the Securities Act.
Response:
We confirm that all units redeemed or otherwise re-acquired by the
trust will not be re-issued to other investors.
8. We note that investors will be entitled to exchange their units in
one series for units in a different series, so long as the exchange
is for the same class of units. In addition, we refer to your
statement that such an exchange will be treated as a redemption of
one unit and the subsequent sale of a separate unit, except that no
redemption fees would be charged. Please supplementally confirm to
us what exemption from registration you will rely upon in connection
with the exchanges.
Response:
Units to be issued in connection with an exchange will have been
registered pursuant to this Registration Statement.
9. Please summarize, immediately following the cover page, the
suitability standards that investors must meet in order to invest in
this offering. In addition, if suitability standards in individual
states in which you intend to offer your units differ from these
standards, please summarize the suitability standards of such
states.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment.
10. Please advise us supplementally whether the managing owner or its
affiliates can purchase units in the offering so as to reach the
minimum subscription. If so, please also disclose this fact on the
cover page of the prospectus and in the prospectus summary.
Response:
<PAGE>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP NEW YORK
Owen Pinkerton, Esq., Senior Attorney
November 18, 2004
Page 5
The Managing Owner or its affiliates may subscribe to purchase
units during the Initial Offering Period. Any units subscribed for by the
Managing Owner or its affiliates will be counted towards the minimum
subscription amount. We have added disclosure regarding the foregoing to the
prospectus summary.
11. Please revise to indicate the factors considered in determining the
offering price. Refer to Item 505 of Regulation S-K.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment. See
the second footnote on the cover page.
12. We note that you propose to offer units in three series - G, H and I
- as well as two classes within each series (Class I and II units).
Please revise the facing page to indicate each security that you are
registering and revise the facing page and cover page of the
prospectus to allocate the number of shares being registered for
each series as well as each class within each series. Please be
aware that all shares being registered must be allocated to a
specific series and class.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment.
13. Please revise your outside cover page to reflect the respective
series in the fee table. When you revise, please indicate which
paragraph of Rule 457 you relied upon for calculation of the
registration fee.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment.
14. Refer to the disclosure concerning your share redemption program on
pages 71-72. Supplementally, please provide a detailed analysis
regarding the applicability of the tender offer rules to the share
redemption program. Specifically, in your
<PAGE>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP NEW YORK
Owen Pinkerton, Esq., Senior Attorney
November 18, 2004
Page 6
analysis please address your intention to redeem shares without any
limit on the percentage of shares you may redeem and the fact that
the redemptions will not be conducted pro rata. Refer to Rule 13e-4
and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act.
Response:
The trust does not have a share redemption program. Units of each
series are redeemable at the option of the holder (in a manner analogous to
shares in an open-end investment company) as of the close of business on the
last business day of each month on five business days' prior written notice.
The absence of any limit on the number of units that may be redeemed and the
absence of pro rata treatment reflects the simple fact that the decision to
redeem or not to redeem as of the end of any month rests entirely with each
unitholder, not the Trust. Except under extraordinary circumstances
(generally, those in which honoring a redemption request would be prejudicial
to non-redeeming unitholders) the trust is required to honor a unitholder's
redemption request. This redemption feature is readily distinguishable from an
issuer self-tender offer in which the issuer offers to repurchase a number of
its shares on particular terms and conditions, an offer which a shareholder
may accept or reject in the shareholder's discretion. Unitholders' redemption
rights are a key feature of the securities being offered, are typical of
public commodity pools and do not constitute a tender offer subject to Rule
13e-4 or Regulation 14E any more than the redemption rights of holders of
shares in an open-end investment company.
Prospectus Cover Page
15. Please confirm that your cover page will be one page only. We refer
to Item 501(b)(3) of Regulation S-K. Please revise to remove
information not required by Item 501, Guide 5 or the Part 4 Rules
promulgated by the CFTC.
Response:
Our cover page will be one page only. We have made revisions in
response to the foregoing comment. Please refer to out response to your
comment no. 3 above regarding Industry Guide 5.
16. Please disclose, in the header, the minimum and maximum number of
units being offered for each series and each class within each
series. In connection with this, please briefly describe what Class
I and Class II units are.
<PAGE>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP NEW YORK
Owen Pinkerton, Esq., Senior Attorney
November 18, 2004
Page 7
Response:
Please note that the minimum and maximum number of units of each
series to be sold during the initial offering period is calculated on a series
by series basis and is aggregated betweer the class I and the class II of each
series.
17. Please revise to briefly define what constitutes a "best efforts"
offering.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment.
18. Please disclose the termination date of the registered offering.
Refer to Item 501(b)(8)(iii).
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment.
19. We note your statement in the first footnote to the table on the
bottom of the cover page stating that should you not reach the
minimum offering for any of the series, money tendered by
subscribers will be returned without penalty together with interest
"within 10 days or as soon thereafter as practicable." Please be
aware that pursuant to Rule 10b-9(a)(1) any funds should be returned
promptly. We do not agree that 10 days is consistent with Rule
10b-9, and the qualification included in this footnote casts doubt
about whether funds would even be returned within this time period.
Please revise accordingly.
Response:
We have made revisions in response to the foregoing comment.
20. Please revise the first cover page risk factor to clarify whether
there is a limitation on the amount to which each fund may be
leveraged.
Response:
<PAGE>
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & W