SEC Comment Letter for Shutterstock, (SSTK) — Oct 4, 2012
Shutterstock, Inc.
Date: Oct. 4, 2012 · CIK: 0001549346 · Accession: 0000000000-12-054823
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: July 20, 2012, September 14, 2012, September 25, 2012
Show Raw Text
October 3 , 2012 Via E -Mail Jonathan Oringer Chief Executive Officer Shutterstock, Inc. 60 Broad Street, 30th Floor New York, NY 10004 Re: Shutterstock, Inc. Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form S -1 Filed September 27 , 2012 File No. 333 -181376 Dear Mr. Oringer: We have reviewed your registration statement and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the requested information. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendmen t is appropriate, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Summary Consolidated Historical and Un audited Pro Forma Financial Data, page 9 1. We note your added disclosure in response to prior comment 1 of our letter dated September 14, 2012. However, it does not appear that the shares you disclose in note (3) on page 11 reconcile to the total weighted average shares outstanding used to compute pro forma as adjusted net income per share of common stock. Please provide a complete reconciliation of these shares, or cross reference to a reconciliation provided elsewhere in the registration statement. Jonathan Oringer Shutterstock, Inc. October 3 , 2012 Page 2 Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements Note (i), page 49 2. We note your response to prior comment 3 of our letter dated September 25, 2012 that for the income statement periods presented, the profits interest charge recorded in the income statement is greater than the pro forma restricted stock charge and, as a re sult, a pro forma credit adjustment to the income statement is reflected. Please clarify why the restricted stock charge is lower than the profits interest charge. In this regard, we note your disclosure on page 46 that this relates to a modification of the award. Please tell us the authoritative accounting guidance you have followed in accounting for this modification, and why it is appropriate to recognize a reduction in compensation expense. Further, tell us what consideration you gave to disclosing t he accounting guidance you are following. Basic and Diluted Pro Forma as Adjusted Net Income Pe r Share of Common Stock, page 50 3. We note your added disclosure in response to prior comment 4 of our letter dated September 25, 2012. Please provide us with t he computation supporting the vesting of restricted stock totaling 8,668 shares and 2,900 shares on a weighted average basis as disclosed in the second and third paragraphs on page 51. Please also tell us how the 112,240 shares described in subsection (ii i) on page 51 are included in your weighted average shares of common stock outstanding basic and clarify your disclosures accordingly. Critical Accounting Policies Equity -Based Compensation Common Stock Valuations, page 76 4. We note your response to prior comment 11 of our letter dated July 20, 2012 and your added disclosure on page 81 that you believe the difference between the fair value of your common stock on the most recent VAR grant date and the anticipated offering pric e range reflects a standard market discount for an initial public offering. Please clarify your disclosure to further describe what this discount represents; what assumptions it incorporates regarding market, industry or company factors and please clarify why the factors and assumptions that determined this discount were not also reflected in your Jonathan Oringer Shutterstock, Inc. October 3 , 2012 Page 3 most recent common stock valuation performed on September 17, 2012. Consolidated Financial Statements Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (2) Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information, page F -18 5. We note that your unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 gives effect to the cash received and liability incurred in connection with your term loan facility. Please tell us why it is app ropriate to include this adjustment alongside your historical balance sheet. We refer you to paragraph 3430 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Reporting Manual. 6. We note that it appears that your unaudited pro forma balance sheet reflects a reduc tion in cash to reflect distributions declared and paid after June 30, 2012. Please tell us why it is appropriate to reflect this distribution as a reduction of cash. In this regard, we also note that your disclosure on page F -19 indicates that this adju stment was reflected as a distribution payable. We refer you to paragraph 3420.1 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Reporting Manual. You may contact Laura Veator, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3716 or Craig Wilson, Senior Assistant Chief Accou ntant, at (202) 551 -3226 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact Edwin Kim, Attorney -Advisor, at (202) 551 -3297 or, in his absence, me at (202) 551 -3462 with any other questions. Sincerely, /s/ Mark P. Shuman Mark P. Shuman Legal Branch Chief cc: Via E -Mail David Ruff, Esq. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP