SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics Monthly Activity About

SEC Company Response from Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd (BTFT) (CIK 0002046216) — Jun 3, 2025

Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd (BTFT) (CIK 0002046216)
Date: June 3, 2025 · CIK: 0002046216 · Accession: 0001213900-25-050920

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: May 13, 2025

Date
June 3, 2025
Author
/s/ Xiaoqin (Sherry) Li
Form
CORRESP
Company
Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd (BTFT) (CIK 0002046216)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Office of Trade & Services 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Attn: Sarmad Makhdoom, Ben Phippen, Todd Schiffman and James Lopez Re: Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd Amendment No. 4 to DRS submitted filed April 18, 2025 File No. 377-07604

Dear Messrs. Schiffman and Lopez:

On behalf of our client, Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd (the “Company”), we hereby provide a response to the comments issued in a letter dated May 13, 2025 (the “Staff’s Letter”) regarding the Company’s Draft Registration Statement Amendment No. 4 (the “Amendment No. 4”) filed January 28, 2025. Contemporaneously, we are filing a Registration Statement on Form F-1(the “Registration Statement”) via Edgar.

In order to facilitate the review by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) of the Registration Statement, we have responded, on behalf of the Company, to the comments set forth in the Staff’s Letter on a point-by-point basis. The numbered paragraphs set forth below respond to the Staff’s comments and correspond to the numbered paragraph in the Staff’s Letter.

Amendment 4 to DRS

Business, page 85

1. We note your response to prior comment 6. You refer to municipal bonds generally funding projects like “building schools, highways or sewer systems” and you refer to the Chinese company issuers generally being “real estate developers, real estate investment platforms” and others. Please revise to identify the nature of the project and the nature of the bond issuer associated with each of your underwriting of dollar denominated bonds.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comments, the Company has revised the disclosure on page 94 of the Registration Statement.

Los Angeles New York Chicago Nashville Washington, DC San Francisco Beijing Hong Kong www.loeb.com

For the United States offices, a limited liability partnership including professional corporations. For Hong Kong office, a limited liability partnership.

June 3, 2025

Page 2

2. We note your responses to prior comments 1 and 6. With a view to clarifying disclosure, advise us why these companies are not required to file under the Trial Measures and advise us whether you plan to follow through with your voluntary filing, as well as the status of that filing. To the extent you conduct diligence activities on these projects and companies and/or conduct underwriting sales efforts for potential investors in Mainland China, it is unclear how you are able to do such activities without “conduct[ing] any business in Mainland China.” Please revise or advise.

Response: The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comments, and respectfully advises the Staff that:

(1) According to the Trial Measures, only overseas securities offering and listing activities are subject to the filing requirements, and pursuant to the Trial Measures, securities refer to equity shares, depository receipts, corporate bonds convertible to equity shares, and other equity securities that are offered and listed overseas, either directly or indirectly. Because U.S. dollar-denominated municipal bonds offerings are not defined as overseas securities offering and listing activities under the Trial Measures, these PRC companies are not required to file under the Trial Measures.

(2) The Company has finished its first voluntary filing as an overseas securities company with the CSRC. It plans to continue to file annual reports with the CSRC about its business activities in the future.

(3) In the U.S. dollar-denominated municipal bonds underwritings, the Company primarily relies on the due diligence conducted by third-party professional institutions, including but not limited to underwriter’s Chinese counsel, underwriter’s Hong Kong counsel, and offshore counsel. The Company’s due diligence is mainly conducted through online meetings, written responses to due diligence questionnaires, telephone communications and publicly available information, with very limited in-person interactions with the issuers in Mainland China. Regarding the underwriting sales efforts, the majority of the investors are overseas institutional investors, instead of the investors in mainland China. In addition, the underwritings occur in the offshore markets. Therefore, according to the Company’s PRC counsel, AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), while the Company occasionally has limited activities in Mainland China, the Company does not conduct business in Mainland China.

Exhibits

3. It appears that you did not file the revised legality opinion. Please file a new opinion removing the statement in Assumption 7 that, “the company will have sufficient authorised but unissued share capital to issue each IPO Share”.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comments, the Company has filed the revised legality opinion as the exhibit 5.1.

June 3, 2025

Page 3

Please call me at 212-407-4939 if you would like additional information with respect to any of the foregoing. Thank you.

Sincerely,
/s/ Xiaoqin (Sherry) Li

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    Xiaoqin (“Sherry”) Li

    Senior Counsel

    345 Park Avenue

    New York, NY 10154

    Direct     212.407.4939

Main       212.407.4000

Fax          212.407.4990

xli@loeb.com

June 3, 2025

    United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 Division of Corporation Finance
 Office of Trade & Services
 100 F Street, N.E.
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Attn: Sarmad Makhdoom, Ben Phippen, Todd Schiffman and James Lopez

 Re: Beta FinTech Holdings Ltd

Amendment No. 4 to DRS submitted filed April 18, 2025

File No. 377-07604

Dear Messrs. Schiffman and Lopez:

On behalf of our client, Beta FinTech
Holdings Ltd (the “Company”), we hereby provide a response to the comments issued in a letter dated May 13, 2025 (the “Staff’s
Letter”) regarding the Company’s Draft Registration Statement Amendment No. 4 (the “Amendment No. 4”) filed January
28, 2025. Contemporaneously, we are filing a Registration Statement on Form F-1(the “Registration Statement”) via Edgar.

In order to facilitate the review
by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) of the Registration Statement, we have responded, on
behalf of the Company, to the comments set forth in the Staff’s Letter on a point-by-point basis. The numbered paragraphs set forth
below respond to the Staff’s comments and correspond to the numbered paragraph in the Staff’s Letter.

Amendment 4 to DRS

Business, page 85

 1. We note your response to prior comment 6. You refer to municipal bonds
                                            generally funding projects like “building schools, highways or sewer systems”
                                            and you refer to the Chinese company issuers generally being “real estate developers,
                                            real estate investment platforms” and others. Please revise to identify the nature
                                            of the project and the nature of the bond issuer associated with each of your underwriting
                                            of dollar denominated bonds.

    Response:
                                  In response to the Staff’s comments, the Company has revised the disclosure on page 94 of
                                  the Registration Statement.

    Los Angeles     New York     Chicago     Nashville     Washington, DC     San Francisco     Beijing     Hong Kong     www.loeb.com

    For the United States offices, a limited liability partnership including
    professional corporations. For Hong Kong office, a limited liability partnership.

    June 3, 2025

    Page 2

 2. We note your responses to prior comments 1 and 6. With a view to clarifying disclosure, advise us why these companies are not
                                                          required to file under the Trial Measures  and advise us whether you
                                                          plan to follow through with your voluntary filing, as well as the status of that filing. To the extent you conduct diligence
                                                          activities on these projects and companies and/or conduct underwriting sales efforts for potential investors in Mainland China, it
                                                          is unclear how you are able to do such activities without “conduct[ing] any business in Mainland China.” Please revise
                                                          or advise.

    Response: The
                              Company acknowledges the Staff’s comments, and respectfully advises the Staff that:

 (1) According to the Trial Measures, only overseas securities offering
and listing activities are subject to the filing requirements, and pursuant to the Trial Measures, securities refer to equity shares,
depository receipts, corporate bonds convertible to equity shares, and other equity securities that are offered and listed overseas,
either directly or indirectly. Because U.S. dollar-denominated municipal bonds offerings are not defined as overseas securities offering
and listing activities under the Trial Measures, these PRC companies are not required to file under the Trial Measures.

 (2) The Company has finished its first voluntary filing as an overseas
securities company with the CSRC. It plans to continue to file annual reports with the CSRC about its business activities in the future.

 (3) In the U.S. dollar-denominated municipal bonds underwritings, the Company primarily relies on the due
                                                                                  diligence conducted by third-party professional institutions, including but not limited to underwriter’s Chinese counsel,
                                                                                  underwriter’s Hong Kong counsel, and offshore counsel. The Company’s due diligence is mainly conducted through online
                                                                                  meetings, written responses to due diligence questionnaires, telephone communications and publicly available information, with very
                                                                                  limited in-person interactions with the issuers in Mainland China. Regarding the  underwriting sales efforts, the majority of
                                                                                  the investors are overseas institutional investors, instead of the investors in mainland China. In addition, the underwritings occur
                                                                                  in the offshore markets. Therefore, according to the Company’s PRC counsel, AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), while the Company
                                                                                  occasionally has limited activities in Mainland China, the Company does not conduct business in Mainland China.

Exhibits

 3. It appears that you did not file the revised legality opinion. Please file a new opinion removing the statement in Assumption 7 that,
“the company will have sufficient authorised but unissued share capital to issue each IPO Share”.

    Response:
                              In response to the Staff’s comments, the Company has filed the
                              revised legality opinion as the exhibit 5.1.

    June 3, 2025

    Page 3

Please call me at 212-407-4939 if you would like
additional information with respect to any of the foregoing. Thank you.

Sincerely,

    /s/ Xiaoqin (Sherry) Li

    Xiaoqin (“Sherry”) Li

    Senior Counsel