SEC Comment Letter for NORTHERN GROWERS LLC (CIK 0001177314) — May 2, 2005
NORTHERN GROWERS LLC (CIK 0001177314)
Date: May 2, 2005 · CIK: 0001177314 · Accession: 0000000000-05-021110
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: April 28, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
April 29, 2005
via U.S. mail and facsimile
Robert Narem, Chief Executive Officer
Northern Growers, LLC
48416 144th Street P.O. Box 356
Big Stone City, SD 57216
RE: Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
File No. 0-50711
Dear Mr. Narem:
We have reviewed your response letter dated April 28, 2005
and
have the following additional comment. If you disagree, we will
consider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable.
In
some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with
supplemental
information so we may better understand your disclosure. After
reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional
comments.
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
Financial Statements
Statements of Operations, page F-4
1. We have read your response to our comment 9. We acknowledge
your
position regarding the credit as something you do not anticipate
recurring on an ongoing basis. However, the credit arose from an
overcharge that was derived from an expense that was originally
recorded and is a recurring expense in cost of revenues. We
further
acknowledge your position discussing transparency and
comparability
regarding this credit and would not object to your including this
credit as a separate line item within cost of revenues to maintain
the transparency and further addressing it in your MD&A.
Additionally, with regards to comparability, while we understand
that
this credit relates to 2003 and 2004 overcharges, these
overcharges
are already included in cost of revenues presumably making these
amounts not comparable on the face of your statements of
operations
to past and future periods. Based on the above, please make the
appropriate restatement by filing an amendment.
We remind you that when you file your restated Form 10-K/A you
should
appropriately address the following:
* an explanatory paragraph in the reissued audit opinion,
* full compliance with APB 20, paragraphs 36 and 37,
* fully update all affected portions of the document, including
MD&A,
selected financial data, and quarterly financial data,
* updated Item 9A. disclosures should include the following:
o a discussion of the restatement and the facts and circumstances
surrounding it,
o how the restatement impacted the CEO and CFO`s original
conclusions
regarding the effectiveness of their disclosure controls and
procedures,
o changes to internal controls over financial reporting, and
o anticipated changes to disclosure controls and procedures and/or
internal controls over financial reporting to prevent future
misstatements of a similar nature.
Refer to Items 307 and 308(c) of Regulation S-K.
* include all updated certifications.
* * * *
As appropriate, please respond to these comments within 10
business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response.
Please furnish a letter that keys your responses to our comments
and
provides any requested supplemental information. Detailed
response
letters greatly facilitate our review. Please file your response
letter on EDGAR. Please understand that we may have additional
comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please
direct them to Meagan Caldwell, Staff Accountant, at (202) 824-
5578
or, in her absence, to the undersigned at (202) 942-1774.
Sincerely,
Rufus Decker
Accounting Branch Chief
??
??
??
??
Mr. Robert Narem
April 29, 2005
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-0510
DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>